Oecologia

, Volume 108, Issue 4, pp 737–748

Effects of drainage and temperature on carbon balance of tussock tundra micrososms

  • L. C. Johnson
  • G. R. Shaver
  • A. E. Giblin
  • K. J. Nadelhoffer
  • E. R. Rastetter
  • J. A. Laundre
  • G. L. Murray
Ecosystems Ecology

Abstract

We examined the importance of temperature (7°C or 15°C) and soil moisture regime (saturated or field capacity) on the carbon (C) balance of arctic tussock tundra microcosms (intact blocks of soil and vegetation) in growth chambers over an 81-day simulated growing season. We measured gaseous CO2 exchanges, methane (CH4) emissions, and dissolved C losses on intact blocks of tussock (Eriophorum vaginatum) and intertussock (moss-dominated). We hypothesized that under increased temperature and/or enhanced drainage, C losses from ecosystem respiration (CO2 respired by plants and heterotrophs) would exceed gains from gross photosynthesis causing tussock tundra to become a net source of C to the atmosphere. The field capacity moisture regime caused a decrease in net CO2 storage (NEP) in tussock tundra micrososms. This resulted from a stimulation of ecosystem respiration (probably mostly microbial) with enhanced drainage, rather than a decrease in gross photosynthesis. Elevated temperature alone had no effect on NEP because CO2 losses from increased ecosystem respiration at elevated temperature were compensated by increased CO2 uptake (gross photosynthesis). Although CO2 losses from ecosystem respiration were primarily limited by drainage, CH4 emissions, in contrast, were dependent on temperature. Furthermore, substantial dissolved C losses, especially organic C, and important microhabitat differences must be considered in estimating C balance for the tussock tundra system. As much as ∼ 20% of total C fixed in photosynthesis was lost as dissolved organic C. Tussocks stored ∼ 2x more C and emitted 5x more methane than intertussocks. In spite of the limitations of this microcosm experiment, this study has further elucidated the critical role of soil moisture regime and dissolved C losses in regulating net C balance of arctic tussock tundra.

Key words

Tussock tundra Net CO2 balance Eriophorum vaginatum Climate change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abacus (1989) Supernova version I. II. Abacus Concepts, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings WD (1987) Carbon balance of Alaskan tundra and taiga ecosystems: past, present, and future. Quat Sci Rev 6: 165–177Google Scholar
  3. Billings WD, Luken JO, Mortensen DA, Peterson KM (1982) Arctic tundra: a source or sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in a changing environment? Oecologia 53: 7–11Google Scholar
  4. Bliss LC, Matveyeva NV (1992) Circumpolar arctic vegetation. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 59–86Google Scholar
  5. Chapin FS III (1983) Direct and indirect effects of temperature on arctic plants. Polar Biol 2: 47–52Google Scholar
  6. Chapin FS III, Miller PC, Billings WD, Coyne PI (1980) Carbon and nutrient budgets and their control in coastal tundra. In: Brown J, Miller PC, Teiszen LL, Bunnell FL (eds) An arctic ecosystem. The coastal tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Dowden Hutchinson and Ross. Stroudsburg, pp 458–482Google Scholar
  7. Christensen T (1993) Methane emission from Arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry 21: 117–139Google Scholar
  8. Cicerone RJ, Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem 21: 117–139Google Scholar
  9. Flanagan RW, Veum AK (1974) Relationships between respiration, weight loss, temperature and moisture in organic residues in tundra. In: Holding AJ et al (eds) Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm, pp 249–277Google Scholar
  10. Funk DW, Pullman ER, Peterson KM, Crill P, Billings WD (1994) Influence of water table on carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane fluxes from taiga bog microcosms. Global Biogeochem Cycles 8: 271–278Google Scholar
  11. Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Shaver GR, Laundre JA, McKerrow AJ (1991) Biogeochemical diversity along a riverside topo sequence in arctic Alaska. Ecol Monogr 61: 415–435Google Scholar
  12. Grulke NE, Reichers GH, Oechel WC, Hjelm U, Jaeger C (1990) Carbon balance in tussock tundra under ambient and elevated CO2. Oecologia 83: 485–494Google Scholar
  13. Hinzman LD, Kane DL (1988) Permafrost hydrology of a small arctic watershed. In: Senneset K (ed) Proceedings, Fifth International Permafrost Conference. Tapir, Trondheim, pp 590–595Google Scholar
  14. Hinzman LD, Kane DL (1992) Potential response of an arctic watershed during a period of global warming. J Geophyis Res 97: 2811–2820Google Scholar
  15. Hinzman LD, Kane DL, Benson CS, Everett KR (in press) Energy balance and hydrologic processes in an arctic watershed. In: Reynolds JF, Tenhunen JD (eds) Landscape function: implications for ecosystem response to disturbance. A case study in arctic tundra (Ecological Studies Series). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinzman LD, Kane DL, Gieck RE, Everett KR (1991) Hydrologic and thermal properties of the active layer in the Alaskan Arctic. Cold Regions Sci Technol 19: 95–110Google Scholar
  17. Kane DL (1993) Meteorological and hydrologic studies in the suppost of long-term ecological research. In: Redmond KT, Tharp VL (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Pacific Climate (PACLIM) Workshop. California Dept of Water Res., Interagency Ecol. Studies Program. Tech. Rep. 34, pp 13–21Google Scholar
  18. Kane DL, Hinzman LD, Benson CS, Liston GE (1991) Snow hydrology of a headwater arctic basin 1. Physical measurements and process studies. Water Resources Institute 27: (6): 1099–1108Google Scholar
  19. Kling GW, Kipphut GW, Miller MC (1990) Arctic lakes and streams as gas conduits to the atmosphere: implications for tundra carbon budgets. Science 251: 298–301Google Scholar
  20. Lashof DA (1989) The dynamic greenhouse: Feedback processes that may influence future concentrations of atmospheric trace gases and climate change. Climate change 14: 213–242Google Scholar
  21. Maxwell B (1992) Arctic climate: potential for change under global warming. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 11–34Google Scholar
  22. Maxwell JB, Barrie LA (1989) Atmospheric and climatic change in the Arctic and Antarctic. Ambio 18: 42–49Google Scholar
  23. McKane RB, Rastetter EB, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Laundre J, Chapin FS III (in press) Analysis of the effects of climate change on C storage in arctic tundra. EcologyGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller PC (1980) Carbon balance in northern ecosystems and the potential effect of carbon dioxide induced climatic change. Report of a workshop. US Department of Energy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Shaver GR, Laundre JL (1991) Effects of temperature and organic matter quality on C, N, and P mineralization in soils from arctic ecosystems. Ecology 72: 242–253Google Scholar
  26. Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Shaver GR, Linkins AE (1992) Microbial processes and plant nutrient availability in arctic soils. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 281–300Google Scholar
  27. Oechel WC (1989) Nutrient and water flux in a small arctic watershed: an overview. Holarct Ecology 12: 229–237Google Scholar
  28. Oechel WC, Billings WD (1992) Effects of global change on the C balance of arctic plants and ecosystems. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 139–168Google Scholar
  29. Oechel WC, Vourlitis GL, Hastings SJ, Bochkarev SA (1995) Change in arctic CO2 flux over two decades: effects of climate change at Barrow, Alaska, Ecol Appl 5: 846–855Google Scholar
  30. Oechel WC, Hastings SJ, Vourlitis G, Jenkins M, Reichers G, Grulke N (1993) Recent change of arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature 361: 520–523Google Scholar
  31. Peterson KM, Billings WD, Reynolds JN (1984) Influence of water table and atmospheric CO2 concentration on the carbon balance of arctic tundra. Arct Alp Res 16: 331–335Google Scholar
  32. Rastetter EB, Ryan MJ, Shaver GR, Melillo JM, Nadelhoffer KJ, Hobbie JE, Aber JD (1991) A general biogeochemical model describing the responses of the C and N cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO2, climate, and N deposition. Tree Physiol 9: 101–126Google Scholar
  33. Rastetter EB, McKane RB, Shaver GR, Melillo JM (1992) Changes in carbon storage by terrestrial ecosystems: how C-N interactions restrict responses to CO2 and temperature. Water Air Soil Pollut 64: 327–344Google Scholar
  34. Rastetter EB, McKane RB, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE (in press) Analysis of CO2, temperature, and moisture effects on C storage in Alaskan arctic tundra using a general ecosystem model. In: Oechel WC, Holten JI (eds) Global change and arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodhe H (1990) A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science 248: 1217–1219Google Scholar
  36. Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1987) Climate model simulations of the equilibrium climatic response to increased carbon dioxide. Rev Geophys 25: 760–798Google Scholar
  37. Sebacher DI, Harriss RC, Bartlett KB, Sebacher SM, Grice SS (1986) Atmospheric methane sources: Alaskan tundra bogs, an alpine fen, and a subarctic boreal marsh. Tellus 48B: 1–10Google Scholar
  38. Shaver GR, Chapin FS III (1980) Response to fertilization by varilation plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61: 662–675Google Scholar
  39. Shaver GR, Chapin FS III (1986) Effect of NPK fertilization on production and biomass of Alaskan tussock tundra. Arc Alp Res 18: 261–268Google Scholar
  40. Shaver GR, Kumerow J (1992) Phenology, resource allocation, and growth of arctic vascular plants. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 193–211Google Scholar
  41. Shaver GR, Billings DW, Chapin FS III, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Oechel WC, and Rastetter EB (1992) Global change and the C balance of Arctic ecosystems. Biocience 42: 433–441Google Scholar
  42. Tieszen LL (1973) Photosynthesis and respiration in arctic tundra grasses: field light intensity and temperature responses. Arct Alp Res 5: 239–251Google Scholar
  43. Tieszen LL (1978) Photosynthesis in the principal Barrow species: a summary of field and laboratory responses. In: Tieszen LL (ed) Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan arctic tundra. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 621–645Google Scholar
  44. Whalen SC, Reeburgh WR (1990) Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils. Nature 346: 160–162Google Scholar
  45. Whalen SC, Reeburgh WR (1992) Interannual variations in tundra methane emission: a 4-year time series at fixed sites. Global Biogeochem cycles 6: 139–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. C. Johnson
    • 1
  • G. R. Shaver
    • 1
  • A. E. Giblin
    • 1
  • K. J. Nadelhoffer
    • 1
  • E. R. Rastetter
    • 1
  • J. A. Laundre
    • 1
  • G. L. Murray
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Biological LaboratoryThe Ecosystems CenterWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations