Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 100–106 | Cite as

Influences of population size and woodland area on bird species distributions in small woods

  • S. A. HinsleyEmail author
  • P. E. Bellamy
  • I. Newton
  • T. H. Sparks
Population Ecology Original Paper

Abstract

Distributions of individual bird species in 151 small woods (size range 0.02–30 ha) were investigated in 3 consecutive years during which the abundance of certain species varied markedly. Relationships between the probabilities of certain bird species breeding and woodland area were described using incidence functions derived from logistic regression analysis. In general, for species which were largely dependent on woodland and seldom occurred in other habitats (such as hedgerows and gardens), the probability of breeding approached 100% only for woods of 10 ha and more, whereas species with less stringent habitat requirements occurred in the majority of woods, including those of 1 ha and less. The sensitivity of incidence functions to changes in regional abundance and the size distribution of the study woods was examined. For some species, distribution patterns could not be distinguished from those expected if pairs had been distributed in proportion to woodland area (random placement), but the majority did not conform to random placement in at least 1 of the 3 years. This nonconformity was consistent across all 3 years for some species, such as wren (Troglodytes troglodytes), despite substantial fluctuations in population sizes between years, while for others, such as robin (Erithacus rubecula), distribution patterns changed with changes in regional abundance. The results suggested that some species, such as wren and blackbird (Turdus merula), preferred small woods, while other species, such as chiffchaff (Phylloscopus collybita), preferred large woods. For several other species, including robin, great tit (Parus major), long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) and marsh tit (P. palustris), small woods appeared to be sub-optimal under at least some conditions.

Key words

Bird species distributions Habitat fragmentation Incidence function Random placement Regional abundance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anglestam P (1992) Conservation of communities—the importance of edges, surroundings and landscape mosaic structure. In: Hansson L (ed) Ecological principles of nature conservation: application in temperate and boreal environments. Elsevier, London, pp 9–70Google Scholar
  2. Beier P (1993) Determining minimum habitat areas and habitat corridors for Cougars. Conserv Biol 7: 94–108Google Scholar
  3. Bellamy PE, Hinsley SA, Newton I (in press). Factors influencing bird species numbers in small woods in south-east England. J Appl EcolGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman BD (1981) On random placement and species-area relations. Math Biosci 54: 191–215Google Scholar
  5. Diamond JM (1978) Critical areas for maintaining viable populations of species. In: Holdgate MW, Woodman MJ (eds) The break-down and restoration of ecosystems. Plenum, New York, pp 27–37Google Scholar
  6. Ehrlich PR, Wilson EO (1991) Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science 253: 758–762Google Scholar
  7. Ford HA (1987) Bird communities on habitat islands in England. Bird Study 34: 205–218Google Scholar
  8. G upenstat 5 Committee (1987) Genstat 5 reference manual. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansson L (1983) Bird numbers across edges between mature conifer forest and clearcuts in Central Sweden. Ornis Scand 14: 97–103Google Scholar
  10. Harris L (1988) Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conserv Biol 2: 330–339Google Scholar
  11. Helle P, Muona J (1985) Invertebrate numbers in edges between clear-fellings and mature forests in northern Finland. Silva Fenn 19: 281–294Google Scholar
  12. Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I (1995a) Bird species turnover and stochastic extinction in woodland fragments. Ecography 18: 41–50Google Scholar
  13. Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I, Sparks TH (1995b) Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J Avian Biol 26: 94–104Google Scholar
  14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Howe RW (1984) Local dynamics of bird assemblages in small forest habitat islands in Australia and North America. Ecology 65: 1585–1601Google Scholar
  16. Lack D (1971) Ecological isolation in birds. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Loman J, Schantz T von (1991) Birds in farmland-more species in small than large habitat island. Conserv Biol 5: 176–188Google Scholar
  18. Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO Jr, Rylands AB, Malcolm JR, Quintela CE, Harper LH, Brown KS Jr, Powell AH, Powell GVN, Schubart HOR, Hays MB (1986) Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Saunderland, pp 35–56Google Scholar
  19. Marchant JH (1983) BTO common bird census instructions. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchant J, Balmer D (1993) Common bird census: 1991–92 index report. Br Trust Ornithol News 187: 9–12Google Scholar
  21. Marchant J, Musty L (1992) Common bird census: 1990–91 index report. Br Trust Ornithol News 182: 9–12Google Scholar
  22. Martin TE (1988) Habitat and area effects on forest bird assemblages: is nest predation an influence? Ecology 69: 74–84Google Scholar
  23. Mead C (1991) The missing migrants. Br Trust Ornithol News 176: 1–2Google Scholar
  24. Opdam P, Rijsdijk G, Hustings F (1985) Bird communities in small woods in an agricultural lanscape: Effects of area and isolation. Biol Conserv 34: 333–352Google Scholar
  25. Robbins CS, Dawson DK, Dowell BA (1989) Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the Middle Atlantic states. Wildl Monogr 103: 1–34Google Scholar
  26. Rolstad J (1991) Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence. In: Gilpin M, Hanski I (eds) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations (reprinted from Biol J Linn Soc 42). Academic Press, London, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  27. Sharrock JTR (1976) The atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  28. Svensson S (1978) Size and isolation of natural reserves: some applications of ecological theory (in Swedish) Anser Suppl 3: 225–234Google Scholar
  29. Vickery PD, Hunter ML Jr, Melvin SM (1994) Effects of habitat area on the distribution of grassland birds in Maine. Conserv Biol 8: 1087–1097Google Scholar
  30. Wenny DG, Clawson RL, Sheriff SL (1993) Population density, habitat selection and minimum area requirements of three forest-interior warblers in central Missouri. Condor 95: 968–979Google Scholar
  31. Wilson EO (1992) The diversity of life. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Hinsley
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. E. Bellamy
    • 1
  • I. Newton
    • 1
  • T. H. Sparks
    • 1
  1. 1.NERC Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks WoodHuntingdonUK

Personalised recommendations