, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 320–328 | Cite as

Localized migration and dispersal by the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci

  • David N. Byrne
  • Robin J. Rathman
  • Thomas V. Orum
  • John C. Palumbo
Population Ecology Original Paper


Laboratory populations of the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, have been shown to consist of both migratory and trivial flying morphs. The behavior of these forms as part of the process of short-range migration was examined under field conditions. Insects were marked in a field of melons using fluorescent dust during two consecutive growing seasons. During the first growing season, passive traps used to collect living whiteflies, were placed along 16 equally spaced transects radiating from the field to a distance of up to 1.0 km. Wind out of the north-east consistently carried migrating whiteflies to traps placed along transects in the south-western quadrant because cold air drainages dictate wind direction during early morning hours in the desert South-west. For this reason, during the second season traps were laid out over fallow ground in a rectangular grid extending 2.7 km to the south-west of the marked field. If dispersal was entirely passive, patterns could be described using a diffusion model. Statistical examination of the data, howèver, demonstrated that the distribution on all days was patchy. Geostatistical techniques were used to describe the observed patchiness. Traps in the immediate vicinity of the marked field caught more whiteflies than the daily median. Large numbers were also collected from near the periphery of the grid. White-flies were far less prevalent in the grid's center. As a result, the distribution of captured whiteflies can be described as bimodal. These patterns confirm behavior observed in the laboratory, i.e., a portion of the population are trivial fliers that do not engage in migration and are consequently captured in traps near the field, and a portion initially respond to cues associated with skylight, ignoring cues provided by the ground, and fly for a period of time before landing in distant traps. During both years movement out of the field had an exaggerated directional component on 13 of 14 days.

Key words

Insecta Whitefly Bemisia Migration Dispersal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bellows TS Jr, Perring TM, Gill RJ, Headrick DH (1994) Description of a species of Bemisia (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:195–206Google Scholar
  2. Blackmer JL, Byrne DN (1993a) Flight behaviour of Bemisia tabaci in a vertical flight chamber: effect of time of day, sex, age and host quality. Physiol Entomol 18:223–232Google Scholar
  3. Blackmer JL, Byrne DN (1993b) Environmental and physiological factors influencing phototactic flight of Bemisia tabaci. Physiol Entomol 18:336–342Google Scholar
  4. Borth PW, Huber RT (1987) Modeling bollworm establishment and dispersion in cotton with the kriging technique. In: 1987 Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Production Conference, January 4–8, 1987 National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, pp 267–274Google Scholar
  5. Brown PW, Machibya T, Russell B (1995) Wind flow patterns at the University of Arizona agricultural centers (Experimental Station Technical Bulletin 268). University of Arizona, Tucson, pp 1–215Google Scholar
  6. Buntin GD, Gilbertz DA, Oetting RD (1993) Chlorophyll loss and gas exchange in tomato leaves after feeding injury by Bemisia tabaci. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J Econ Entomol 86:517–522Google Scholar
  7. Byrne DN, Bretzel PK von (1987) Similarity in flight activity rhythms in coexisting species of Aleyrodidae, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Trialeurodes abutilonea (Haldeman). Entomol Exp Appl 43:215–219Google Scholar
  8. Byrne DN, Houck MA (1990) Morphometric identification of wing polymorphism in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:487–493Google Scholar
  9. Byrne DN, Buchmann SL, Spangler HG (1988) Relationship between wing loading wingbeat frequency and body mass in homopterous insects. J Exp Biol 135:9–23Google Scholar
  10. Byrne DN, Bellows TS, Parrella MP (1990) Whiteflies in agricultural systems. In: Gerling D (ed) Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept, Wimborne, pp 227–261Google Scholar
  11. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen S (1990) Epidemiology of whitefly-transmitted viruses. In: Gerling D (ed) Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept, Wimborne, pp 211–225Google Scholar
  13. Costa HS, Brown JK (1991) Variation in biological characteristics and esterase patterns among populations of Bemisia tabaci, and the association of one population with silverleaf symptom development. Entomol Exp Appl 61:211–219Google Scholar
  14. Davis MA (1980) Why are most insects short fliers? Evol Theor 5:103–111Google Scholar
  15. Dingle H (1979) Adaptive variation in the evolution of insect migration. Rabb RL, Kennedy GG (eds) Movement of highly mobile insects. Concepts and methodology in research. North Carolina State University Press, Raleigh, N.C. pp 64–87Google Scholar
  16. Glick PA (1939) The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air (technical bulletin 673). US Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp 1–151Google Scholar
  17. Hector DJ, Hodgkinson ID (1989) Stickiness in cotton. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Journel AG (1989) Fundamentals of Geostatistics in Five Lessons. Short Course in Geology. American Geophysical Union. Washington D.C. Vol. 8. 40 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson CG (1969) Migration and dispersal of insects by flight. Metheun, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemp WP, Kalaris TM, Quimby WF (1989) Rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) spatial variability: macroscale population assessment. J Econ Entomol 82:1270–1276Google Scholar
  22. Liebhold AM, Rossi RE, Kemp WP (1993) Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 38:303–327Google Scholar
  23. Loxdale HD, Hardie J, Halbert S, Foottit R, Kidd NAC, Carter CI (1993) The relative importance of short-and long-range movement of flying aphids. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 68:291–311Google Scholar
  24. Myers DE (1991) Interpolation and estimation with spatially located data. Chemometrics Intelligent Lab Syst 11:209–228Google Scholar
  25. Pasek JE (1988) Influence of wind and windbreaks on local dispersal of insects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23:539–554Google Scholar
  26. Pedgley DE (1982) Windborne and pests and diseases: meteorology of airborne organisms. Ellis Horwood, ChinchesterGoogle Scholar
  27. Pedgley DE (1993) Managing migratory insect pests — a review. Int J Pest Manage 39:3–12Google Scholar
  28. Prabhaker N, Toscano NC, Perring TM, Nuessley G, Kido K, Youngman RR (1992) Resistance monitoring of the sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the Imperial Valley of California. J Econ Entomol 85:1063–1068Google Scholar
  29. Rossi RE, Borth PW, Tollefson JJ (1993) Stochastic simulation for characterizing ecological spatial patterns and appraising risk. Ecol Appl 3:719–735Google Scholar
  30. Schotzko DJ, O'Keeffe LE (1989) Geostatistical description of the spatial distribution of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) in lentils. J Econ Entomol 82:1277–1288Google Scholar
  31. Schotzko DJ, Smith CM (1991) Effects of host plant on the between-plant spatial distribution of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 84:1725–1734Google Scholar
  32. Turchin P, Thoeny WT (1993) Quantifying dispersal of southern pine beetles with mark-recapture experiments and a diffusion model. Ecol Appl 3:187–198Google Scholar
  33. Urquhart FA, 1960. The monarch butterfly. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Byrne
    • 1
  • Robin J. Rathman
    • 1
  • Thomas V. Orum
    • 2
  • John C. Palumbo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations