Oecologia

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 327–336

Comparative unpalatability of mimetic viceroy butterflies (Limenitis archippus) from four south-eastern United States populations

  • David B. Ritland
Original Paper

Abstract

Viceroy butterflies (Limenitis archippus), long considered palatable mimics of distasteful danaine butterflies, have been shown in studies involving laboratoryreared specimens to be moderately unpalatable to avian predators. This implies that some viceroys are Müllerian co-mimics, rather than defenseless Batesian mimics, of danaines. Here, I further test this hypothesis by assessing the palatability of wild-caught viceroys from four genetically and ecologically diverse populations in the southeastern United States. Bioassays revealed that viceroys sampled from three sites in Florida and one in South Carolina were all moderately unpalatable to captive redwinged blackbird predators, which ate fewer than half of the viceroy abdomens presented. Red-wings commonly exhibited long manipulation times and considerable distress behavior when attempting to eat a viceroy abdomen, and they taste-rejected over one-third of viceroys after a single peck. These findings, the first based on wild-caught butterflies, support the hypothesis that the viceroy-danaine relationship in some areas represents Müllerian mimicry, prompting a reassessment of selective forces shaping the interaction. Moreover, considerable variation in palatability of individual viceroys, and in behavior of individual birds, contributes to the complexity of chemical defense and mimicry in this system.

Key words

Chemical defense Batesian mimicry Müllerian mimicry Predator behavior Predator/prey interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackery PR (1987) Hostplants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 33:95–203Google Scholar
  2. Ackery PR, Vane-Wright RI (1984) Milkweed butterflies: their cladistics and biology. Cornell University Press for the British Museum (Natural History), IthacaGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso-Mejia A (1992) Age-related loss of cardenolides in the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus). M.S. Thesis, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  4. Argus GW (1986) The genus Salix (Salicaceae) in the southeastern United States (Systematic botany monographs vol 9). American Society of Plant Taxonomists,Google Scholar
  5. Bates HW (1862) Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Trans Linn Soc Lond 23:495–56Google Scholar
  6. Bowers MD (1980) Unpalatability as a defense strategy of Euphydryas phaeton. Evolution 34:586–600Google Scholar
  7. Bowers MD (1981) Unpalatability as a defense strategy of western checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas Scudder, Nymphalidae). Evolution 35:367–375Google Scholar
  8. Bowers MD (1988) Plant allelochemistry and mimicry. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK (eds) Novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 273–311Google Scholar
  9. Bowers MD (1992) The evolution of unpalatability and the cost of chemical defense in insects. In: Roitberg BD, Isman MB (eds) Insect chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 216–244Google Scholar
  10. Brower JVZ (1958a) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. I. The monarch, Danaus plexippus and viceroy, Limenitis archippus. Evolution 12:32–47Google Scholar
  11. Brower JVZ (1958b) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. III. Danaus gilippus berenice and Limenitis archippus floridensis. Evolution 12:273–285Google Scholar
  12. Brower LP (1984) Chemical defence in butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  13. Brower LP (1985) New perspectives on the migration biology of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L. In: Rankin MA (ed) Migration: mechanisms and adaptive significance. University of Texas, Austin, pp 748–785Google Scholar
  14. Brower LP, Brower JVZ (1964) Birds, butterflies, and plant poisons: a study in ecological chemistry. Zoologica 49:137–159Google Scholar
  15. Brower LP, Brower JVZ (1972) Parallelism, convergence, divergence and the new concept of advergence in the evolution of mimicry. Transactions Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp 59–67Google Scholar
  16. Brower LP, Fink LS (1985) A natural toxic defense system: Cardenolides in butterflies versus birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 443:171–188Google Scholar
  17. Brower LP, Glazier SC (1975) Localization of heart poisons in the monarch butterfly. Science 188:19–25Google Scholar
  18. Brower LP, Brower JVZ, Corvino JM (1967) Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 57:893–898Google Scholar
  19. Brower LP, Ryerson WN, Coppinger LL, Glazier SC (1968) Ecological chemistry and the palatability spectrum. Science 161:1349–1351Google Scholar
  20. Brower LP, Pough FH, Meck HR (1970) Theoretical investigations of automimicry. I. Single trial learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 66:1059–1066Google Scholar
  21. Brower LP, Edmunds M, Moffitt CM (1975) Cardenolide content and palatability of a population of Danaus chrysippus butterflies from West Africa. J Entomol A 49:183–196Google Scholar
  22. Brower LP, Seiber JN, Nelson CJ, Lynch SP, Holland MM (1984) Plant-determined variation in the cardenolide content, thinlayer chromatography profiles, and emetic potency of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, reared on the milkweed, Asclepias speciosa, in California. J Chem Ecol 10:601–639Google Scholar
  23. Chai P (1990) Relationships between visual characteristics of rainforest butterflies and responses of a specialized insectivorous bird. In: Wicksten M (ed) Adaptive coloration in invertebrates (Proceedings of the American Society of Zoologists Symposium). Texas A&M University Press, pp 31–60Google Scholar
  24. Cohen JA (1985) Differences and similarities in cardenolide content of queen and monarch butterflies in Florida and their ecological and evolutionary implications. J Chem Ecol 11:85–103Google Scholar
  25. Coppinger RP (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am Nat 104:323–335Google Scholar
  26. Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463Google Scholar
  27. Elias TE (1987) The complete trees of North America. Gramercy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans DL, Schmidt JO (1990) Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibson DO (1980) The role of escape in mimicry and polymorphism: I. The response of captive birds to artificial prey. Biol J Linn Soc 14:201–214Google Scholar
  30. Gilbert LE (1983) Coevolution and mimicry. In: Futuyma DS, Slatkin M (eds) Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 263–281Google Scholar
  31. Greenberg R (1983) The role of neophobia in determining the degree of foraging specialization in some migrant warblers. Am Nat 122:444–453Google Scholar
  32. Guilford T (1990) The secrets of aposematism: unlearned responses to specific colors and patterns. Trends Ecol Evol 5:323Google Scholar
  33. Guilford T (1991) Is the viceroy a batesian mimic? (scientific correspondence). Nature 351:611Google Scholar
  34. Huheey JE (1976) Studies in warning coloration and mimicry. VII. Evolutionary consequences of a Batesian-Müllerian spectrum: a model for Müllerian mimicry. Evolution 30:86–93Google Scholar
  35. Huheey JE (1984) Warning coloration and mimicry. In: Bell WJ, Cardé RT (eds), Chemical ecology of insects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 257–297Google Scholar
  36. Lynch SP, Martin RA (1993) Milkweed host plant utilization and cardenolide sequestration by monarch butterflies in Louisiana and Texas. In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds) Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly (Contributions in Science). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, pp 107–123Google Scholar
  37. Malcolm SB (1990) Mimicry: status of a classic evolutionary paradigm. Trends Ecol Evol 5:57–62Google Scholar
  38. Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP (1987) Monarch butterfly voltinism: effects of temperature constraints at different latitudes. Oikos 49:77–82Google Scholar
  39. Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP (1993) Spring recolonization of eastern North America by the monarch butterfly: successive brood or single sweep migration? In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds) Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly, (Contributions in Science). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, pp 253–267Google Scholar
  40. Mallet J (1990) Is mimicry theory unpalatable? (letters to the Editor). Trends Ecol Evol 5:344–345Google Scholar
  41. Mason JR, Reidinger RF (1982) Observational learning of food aversions in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk 99:548–554Google Scholar
  42. Masters AR (1992) Chemical defense in Ithomiine butterflies (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller LD, Brown FM (1981) A catalogue/checklist of the butterflies of America north of Mexico (Memoir no 2). The Lepidopterists' Society, SarasotaGoogle Scholar
  44. Nahrstedt A, Davis RH (1983) Occurrence, variation and biosynthesis of the cyanogenic glucosides linamarin and lotaustralin in species of the Heliconiini (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Comp Biochem Phys 75B:65–73Google Scholar
  45. Palo TR (1984) Distribution of birch (Betula spp), willow (Salix spp) and poplar (Populus spp) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defenses against herbivores. J Chem Ecol 10:499–520Google Scholar
  46. Pasteels JM, Rowell-Rahier M, Raupp MJ (1988) Plant-derived defense in chrysomelid beetles. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK (eds) Novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 235–272Google Scholar
  47. Platt AP (1983) Evolution of North American admiral butterflies. Bull Entomol Soc Am 29:10–22Google Scholar
  48. Platt AP, Coppinger RP, Brower LP (1971) Demonstration of the selective advantage of mimetic Limenitis butterflies presented to caged avian predators. Evol 25:692–701Google Scholar
  49. Pough FH Jr, Brower LP (1977) Predation by birds on great southern white butterflies as a function of palatability, sex and habitat. Am Midl Nat 98:50–58Google Scholar
  50. Pough FH Jr, Brower LP, Meck HR, Kessell SR (1973) Theoretical investigations of automimicry: multiple trial learning and the palatability spectrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:2261–2265Google Scholar
  51. Poulton EB (1909) Mimccry in the butterflies of North America. Ann Entomol Soc Am 2:203–242Google Scholar
  52. Remington CL (1968) Suture zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. Evol Biol 2:321–428Google Scholar
  53. Riley TJ (1993) Spring migration and oviposition of the monarch butterfly in Louisiana. In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds) Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly (Contributions in Science). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, pp 269–273Google Scholar
  54. Ritland DB (1991a) Ecological dynamics of viceroy butterfly mimicry in Florida. Ph. D. dissertation, university of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ritland DB (1991b) Unpalatability of the viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) and its purported mimicry model, the Florida queen (Danaus gilippus). Oecologia 88:102–108Google Scholar
  56. Ritland DB (1991c) Revising a classic butterfly mimicry scenario: demonstration of Müllerian mimicry between Florida viceroys (Limenitis archippus floridensis) and queens (Danaus gilippus berenice). Evolution 45:918–934Google Scholar
  57. Ritland DB (1991d) Palatability of aposematic queen butterflies (Danaus gilippus) feeding on Sarcostemma clausum (Asclepiadaceae) in Florida. J Chem Ecol 17:1594–1610Google Scholar
  58. Ritland DB (1994) Variation in palatability of queen butterflies (Danaus gilippus) and implications regarding mimicry. Ecology 75:732–746Google Scholar
  59. Ritland DB, Brower LP (1991a) The viceroy butterfly is not a Batesian mimic. Nature 350:497–498Google Scholar
  60. Ritland DB, Brower LP (1991b) Mimicry and viceroy butterflies (scientific correspondence). Nature 353:24Google Scholar
  61. Roper TJ, Wistow R (1986) Aposematic coloration and avoidance learning in chicks. Q J Exp Psychol 38B:141–149Google Scholar
  62. Rothschild M (1991) Is the viceroy a batesian mimic? (scientific correspondence). Nature 351:611–612Google Scholar
  63. Sargent TD (1995) On the relative acceptabilities of local butterflies and moths to local birds. J Lepid Soc (in press)Google Scholar
  64. Schuler W, Hesse E (1985) On the function of warning coloration: a black and yellow pattern inhibits prey-attack by naive domestic chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:249–255Google Scholar
  65. Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  66. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Speed MP (1993) Muellerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Anim Behav 45:571–580Google Scholar
  68. Starrett A (1993) Adaptive resemblance: a unifying concept for mimicry and crypsis. Biol J Linn Soc 48:299–317Google Scholar
  69. Turner JRG (1987) The evolutionary dynamics of batesian and muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol Entomol 12:81–85Google Scholar
  70. Whitman DW (1988) Allelochemical interactions among plants, herbivores and their hosts. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK (eds) novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 11–64Google Scholar
  71. Witthohn K, Naumann CM (1987) Cyanogenesis — a general phenomenon in the Lepidoptera? J Chem Ecol 13:1789–1809Google Scholar
  72. Witz BW (1989) Antipredator mechanisms in arthropods: a twenty-year literature survey. Fla Entomol 73:71–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Ritland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyErskine CollegeDue WestUSA

Personalised recommendations