Oecologia

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 270–274 | Cite as

Does the cost of incubation set limits to clutch size in common eiders Somateria mollissima?

  • Kjell Einar Erikstad
  • Torkild Tveraa
Original Paper

Abstract

We examined the effect of natural clutch size on the cost of incubation in a population of common eiders Somateria mollissima nesting in Tromsø, northern Norway. The body condition of females at day 5 in the incubation period was not related to clutch size (3–6 eggs), but females incubating large clutches lost more mass and had a lower body condition at day 20 in the incubation period than females incubating small clutches. Females incubating large clutches had a slightly shorter incubation period and a lower egg predation rate. The results do not support the hypothesis that the female's ability to produce eggs is the only ultimate control of clutch size in eider. Instead the results suggest that there may be an interaction between the allocation of body reserves to eggs and incubation, and that females producing large clutches allocate more of their body reserves to incubation than females producing small clutches, in order to shorten the incubation period and to minimise the risk of predation on eggs.

Key words

Clutch size Cost of incubation Parental effort Nest predation Mass loss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afton AD, Paulus SL (1992) Incubation and brood care in waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Jonson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) The ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Saint Paul, pp 62–108Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich TW, Raveling DG (1983) Effects of experience and body weight on behaviour of Canada geese. Auk 100: 670–679Google Scholar
  3. Andersson M (1978) Optimal egg shape in waders. Ornis Fenn 55: 105–109Google Scholar
  4. Ankney CD, Afton AD (1988) Bioenergetics of breeding northern shovelers: diet, nutrition reserves, clutch size, and incubation. Condor 90: 459–472Google Scholar
  5. Ankney CD, MacInnes CD (1978) Nutrient reserves and reproductive performance of female lesser snow geese. Auk 95: 459–471Google Scholar
  6. Ankney CD, Afton A, Alisauskas RT (1991) The role of nutrient reserves in limiting waterfowl reproduction. Condor 93: 1029–1032Google Scholar
  7. Armstrong T, Robertson RJ (1988) Parental investment based on clutch size value: nest desertion in response to partial clutch size in dabbling ducks. Anim Behav 36: 941–943Google Scholar
  8. Arnold TW (1992) Continuous laying by American coots in response to partial clutch removal and total clutch loss. Auk 109: 407–421Google Scholar
  9. Arnold TW, Rohwer FC (1991) Do egg formation costs limit clutch size in waterfowl? A skeptical view. Condor 93:1032–1038Google Scholar
  10. Biebach H (1981) Energetic of cost of incubation in different clutch sizes in starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Ardea 69:141–142Google Scholar
  11. Biebach H (1984) Effect of clutch size and time of day on the energy expenditure of starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Physiol Zool 57:26–31Google Scholar
  12. Bjørn TH, Erikstad KE (1994) Patterns of intraspecifc nest parasitism in the high Arctic common eider Somateria mollissima borealis. Can J Zool 72: 1027–1034Google Scholar
  13. Bustnes JO, Erikstad KE (1991) Parental care in the common eider Somateria mollissima: factors affecting abandonment and adoption of young. Can J Zool 69: 1538–1545Google Scholar
  14. Clawson RL, Hartman GW, Fredrickson LH (1979) Dump nesting in a Missouri wood duck population. J Wildl Manage 43:347–355Google Scholar
  15. Coleman RM, Whittall RD (1988) Clutch size and the cost of incubation in the Bengalese finch Lonchurastriata var. domestica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:367–372Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental invesment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262:131–133Google Scholar
  17. Drobney RD (1980) Reproductive bioenergetics of wood ducks. Auk 97: 480–490Google Scholar
  18. Erikstad KE, Bustnes JO (1994) Clutch size determination in common eiders: an egg removal and egg addition experiment. J Avian Biol 25:215–218Google Scholar
  19. Erikstad KE, Bustnes JO, Moum T (1993) Clutch-size determination in precocial birds: a study of the common eider. Auk 110: 623–628Google Scholar
  20. Flint PL, Sedinger JS (1992) Reproductive implications of eggsize variation in the black brant. Auk 109:896–903Google Scholar
  21. Gabrielsen G, Mehlum F, Karlsen HE Andersen Ø, Parker H (1991) Energy cost during incubation and thermoregulation in female common eiders Somateria molissima Norsk Polarinst Skr 195:51–62Google Scholar
  22. Gloutney ML, Clark RG (1991) The significance of body mass to female dabbling ducks during late incubation. Condor 93:811–816Google Scholar
  23. Gorman ML, Milne H (1971) Seasonal changes in the adrenal steroid tissue of the common eider Somateria mollissima and its relation to organic metabolism in normal and oil-polluted birds. Ibis 113:218–228Google Scholar
  24. Haftorn S, Reinertsen RE (1985) The effect of temperature and clutch size on the energetic cost of incubation in a free-living blue tit Parus caeruleus. Auk 102:470–478Google Scholar
  25. Harvey WF, Hepp GR, Kennamer RA (1989) Body mass dynamics of wood ducks during incubation: individual variation. Can J Zool. 67:570–574Google Scholar
  26. Hepp GR, Kennamer RA, Harvey WF (1990) Incubation as a reproductive cost in female wood ducks. Auk 107:756–764Google Scholar
  27. Kålås JA, Løfaldli L (1987) Clutch size in the dotterel Charadrius morinellus: an adaptation to parental incubation behaviour. Ornis Scand 18:316–319Google Scholar
  28. Korschgen CE (1977) Breeding stress of female eiders in Maine. J Wildl Manage 41:360–373Google Scholar
  29. Lack D (1967) The significance of clutch-size in waterfowl. Wildfowl 18:125–128Google Scholar
  30. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptation for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Maho Y, Vu Van Hha H, Koubi H, Dewasmes G, Girard J, Ferre P, Cagnard M (1981) Body composition, energy expenditure, and plasma metabolites in long-term fasting geese. Am J Physiol 241:E342-E354Google Scholar
  32. Lessells CM, Cooke F, Rockwell F (1989) Is there a trade off between egg weight and clutch size in wild lesser snow geese Anser c. caerulescens? J Evol Biol 2:457–472Google Scholar
  33. Mehlum F (1991) Egg predation in a breeding colony of the common eider Somateria mollissima in Kongsfjord, Svalbard. Norsk Polarinst Skr 195:21–29Google Scholar
  34. Milne H (1976) Body weights and carcass composition of the common eider. Wildfowl 27:115–122Google Scholar
  35. Moreno J (1989) Strategies of mass change in breeding birds. Biol J Linn Soc 37:297–310Google Scholar
  36. Moreno J, Carlson A (1989) Clutch size and the cost of incubation in the pied flycather Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand 20:123–128Google Scholar
  37. Munro J, Bédard J (1977) Crèching behaviour in the common eider. J Anim Ecol 46: 799–810Google Scholar
  38. Parker H, Holm H (1990) Patterns of nutrient and energy expenditure in female common eiders nesting in the high Arctic Auk: 107:660–668Google Scholar
  39. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Rohwer FC (1985) The adaptive significance of clutch size in prairie ducks. Auk 102:354–361Google Scholar
  41. Rohwer FC (1988) Inter-and intraspecific relationships between egg size and clutch size in waterfowl. Auk 105:161–176Google Scholar
  42. Rohwer FC, Eisenhower DI (1989) Egg mass and clutch size relationships in geese eiders, and swans. Ornis Scand 20:43–48Google Scholar
  43. SAS Institute (1990) SAS/STAT userś guide, release 6.04. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith HG (1989) Larger clutches take longer time to incubate. Ornis Scand 20:156–158Google Scholar
  45. Szèkely T, Karsai I, Williams TD (1994) Determination of clutch size in the Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrius. Ibis 136:341–348Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjell Einar Erikstad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Torkild Tveraa
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tromsø MuseumUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of Ecology/ZoologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations