Advertisement

Archive for History of Exact Sciences

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 29–37 | Cite as

Newton's views on aether and gravitation

  • L. Rosenfeld
Article

Keywords

Aether 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Newton, I., Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, first edition 1687.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The correspondence of Isaac Newton, (further quoted as “Correspondence”), vol. 3: letter 399 of January 17, 1692/93, esp. p. 240.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newton, I., Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, second edition 1713: Scholium generale.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Correspondence, vol. 1: letter 146 to Oldenburg of December 7, 1675, esp. p. 366.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 233 of February 28, 1678/79, esp. p. 295.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 288 of June 20, 1686 and letter 291 of July 27, 1686.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 288, p. 440.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newton, I., Opticks, second edition 1717–18; new queries numbered 17–24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, A. R. & M. B., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton (Cambridge University Press, 1962), p. 321–333, 349–359.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 183–213.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenfeld, L., Newton and the law of gravitation (Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 365 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 291, p. 447.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aiton, E. J., Newton's Aether Stream Hypothesis and the Inverse Square Law of Gravitation (Annals of Science).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gagnebin, B, De la cause de la pesanteur, mémoire de Nicolas Fatio de Duillier (Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 6, 105 (1949)) (further quoted as “Gagnebin”).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Œuvres complètes de C. Huygens (further quoted as “Œuvres”), vol. 19, p. 619; vol. 21, p. 379.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Œuvres, vol. 9, p. 167 (also Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 307, and Gagnebin, p. 109).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gagnebin, p. 114–115 (also Correspondence, vol. 3: letter 352, note (1), p. 69, where the second entry, however, is wrongly interpreted as referring to the exposition of Fatio's own theory).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Œuvres, vol. 21, p. 429.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Correspondence, vol. 3: letter 463, p. 390.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Œuvres, vol. 9, p. 381.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gagnebin, p. 115–116.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gagnebin, p. 116–117.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gagnebin, p. 154–158 (also, but incomplete, Œuvres, vol. 9, p. 391).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Œuvres, vol. 9, p. 407 (letter to Huygens of April 11, 1690).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Œuvres, vol. 10, p. 608 (also Correspondence, vol. 3: letter 440).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Loc. cit. in note 9, p. 313.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Œuvres, vol. 10, p. 354.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Œuvres, vol. 10, p. 613 (letter to Leibniz of May 29, 1694 (n.s.)) and p. 669 (letter to Leibniz of August 24, 1694 (n.s.)).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Œuvres, vol. 10, p. 603 (letter to Huygens of April 26, 1694 (n.s.)) and p. 644 (letter to Huygens of June 22, 1694 (n.s.)).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Correspondence, vol. 2, note (4) to letter 275, p. 412.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Correspondence, vol. 2: letter 276 of January 12, 1684/85 to Flamsteed.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Newton, I., Optice (translated by S. Clarke) 1706, quaestio 23 (= query 31 in later editions); see also Robinet, A., (ed.), Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1957).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Rosenfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.NORDITACopenhagen

Personalised recommendations