, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 618–623 | Cite as

Cytogenetic evidence for the specific distinction of an Alaskan marmot, Marmota broweri Hall and Gilmore (Mammalia: Sciuridae)

  • Robert L. Rausch
  • Virginia R. Rausch


Cytogenetic studies based upon somatic cells (bone marrow) have disclosed that the marmot hitherto designated Marmota caligata broweriHall and Gilmore, occurring in the Brooks Range of arctic Alaska, differs from M. c. caligata (Eschscholtz) in number of chromosomes (2n=36 as compared with 2n=42 in M. caligata) and in proportions of chromosomal types. Typical karyograms for the two species are presented. It is concluded that the Brooks Range marmot is specifically distinct from M. caligata, the applicable name being Marmota broweriHall and Gilmore. Also determined were diploid chromosome numbers for two other Nearctic species of marmots, M. flaviventris (Audubon and Bachman), with 42, and M. olympus (Merriam), with 40. It is suggested that M. broweri survived the last (Wisconsin) glaciations in the amphi-Beringian refugium, and that its closest affinities may be with one of the Eurasian species of Marmota.


Bone Marrow Somatic Cell Developmental Biology Chromosome Number Cytogenetic Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Conger, A. D., and Lucile M. Fairchild: A quick-freeze method for making smear slides permanent. Stain Technol. 28, 281–283 (1953).Google Scholar
  2. Couser, W., P. Sargent, L. E. Brownhill, and K. Benirschke: The somatic chromosomes of the Northeastern American woodchuck, Marmota monax. Cytologia (Tokyo) 28, 108–111 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Dalquest, W. W.: Mammals of Washington. Univ. Kansas Publ., Mus. Nat. Hist. 2, 444 p. (1948).Google Scholar
  4. Ellerman, J. R., and T. C. S. Morrison-Scott: Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946, 810 p. London, Brit, Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 1951.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, E. R., and K. R. Kelson: The Mammals of North America, vol. 1, 546 p. N. Y.: Ronald Press 1959.Google Scholar
  6. Howell, A. H.: Revision of the American marmots. N. Amer. Fauna No 37, 80 p. (1915).Google Scholar
  7. Moore, J. C.: The spread of existing diurnal squirrels across the Bering and Panamanian land bridges. Amer. Museum Novitates No 2044, 26 p. (1961).Google Scholar
  8. Nadler, C. F.: Chromosome studies in certain subgenera of Spermophilus. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. (N.Y.) 110, 785–788 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. —, and M. H. Block: The chromosomes of some North American chipmunks (Sciuridae) belonging to the genera Tamias and Eutamias. Chromosoma (Berl.) 13, 1–15 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. Rausch, R. L.: On the status of some arctic mammals. Arctic 6, 91–148 (1953); - Origin of the mammalian fauna of the Kodiak Archipelago. In: The Kodiak Island refugium, its geologic and biologic history. Ed. T. Karlstrom et al. (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Rausch
    • 1
  • Virginia R. Rausch
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S.Department of Health, Education, and WelfareArctic Health Research Center, Public Health ServiceAnchorage

Personalised recommendations