Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 250–256 | Cite as

Low level chromium (VI) inhalation effects on alveolar macrophages and immune functions in Wistar rats

  • U. Glaser
  • D. Hochrainer
  • H. Klöppel
  • H. Kuhnen
Original Investigations
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In inhalation chambers, 5-week-old male Wistar rats of the strain TNO-W-74 were continuously exposed to submicron aerosols of sodium dichromate in concentrations from 25 (low level) to 200 μg/m3 Cr (high level). Subacute exposure (28 days) to 25 and 50 μg/m3 Cr resulted in “activated” alveolar macrophages with stimulated phagocytic activities, and significantly elevated antibody responses to injected SRBC's. After subchronic (90 days) low level exposure there was a more pronounced effect on activation of the alveolar macrophages, with increased phagocytic activities. However, at high Cr (VI) exposure level (200 μg/m3), inhibited phagocytic function of the alveolar macrophages was seen. In rats which were exposed to this chromium aerosol concentration for 42 days, the lung clearance of inert iron oxide was reduced significantly. The humoral immune system was still stimulated at subchronic low chromium aerosol concentrations of 100 μg/m3, but significantly depressed at 200 μg/m3 Cr. These results show that respiratory defence and immunologic functions were stimulated or inhibited depending on dose and time of chromium (VI) inhalation.

Keywords

Chromium (VI) Inhalation Rat Alveolar macrophages Immune response 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1980) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents in the workroom environment with intended changes for 1980. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson N (1982) The environmental impact of chromium. Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Berenbaum MC (1971) Immunosuppression by platinum diamines. Br J Cancer 25: 208–211Google Scholar
  4. Blakley BR, Sisodia CS, Mukkur TK (1980) The effect of methyl mercury, to tetraethyllead and sodium arsenite on the humoral immune response in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 52: 245–254Google Scholar
  5. Bovet P, Lob M, Grandjean M (1977) Spirometric alterations in workers in the chromium electroplating industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 40: 25–23Google Scholar
  6. Boyle W (1968) An extension of the 51Cr-release assay for the estimation of mouse cytotoxins. Transplantation 6: 761–764Google Scholar
  7. Bozelka BE, Burkholder PM, Chang LW (1978) Cadmium, a metallic inhibitor of antibody-mediated immunity in mice. Environ Res 17: 390–402Google Scholar
  8. Brain JD, Frank NR (1968) Recovery of free cells from rat lungs by repeated washings. J Appl Physiol 25: 63–69Google Scholar
  9. Castranova V, Bowman L, Reasor MJ, Miles PR (1980) Effects of heavy metal ions on selected oxidative metabolic processes in rat alveolar macrophages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 53: 14–23Google Scholar
  10. Debruin A (1971) Certain biological effects of lead upon the animal organisms. Arch Environ Health 23: 249–264Google Scholar
  11. DFG Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1983) Luftanalysen, analytische Methoden zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe, Band 1, Methodennummer 1: Lösliche Chromverbindungen. Arbeitsgruppe Analytische Chemie, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, F.R.GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Figoni R, Treagan L (1975) Inhibition effect of nickel and chromium upon antibody response of rats to immunization with T-1 phage. Res Commun Chem Pathol and Pharmacol 11: 335–338Google Scholar
  13. Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B et al. (1969) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St John's Hosp Derm Soc 55: 17–35Google Scholar
  14. Gardner DE (1982) Use of experimental airborne infections for monitoring altered host defenses. Environ Health Perspectives 43: 99–107Google Scholar
  15. Gardner DE, JA Graham, FJ Miller, JW Illing, DL Coffin (1973) Technique for differentiating particles that are cell associated or ingested by macrophages. Applied Microbiology 25: 471–475Google Scholar
  16. Graham JA, Gardner DE, Waters MD, Coffin DL (1975) Effect of trace metals on phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages. Infect Immun 11: 1278–1283Google Scholar
  17. Graham JA, Miller FJ, Daniels MJ, Payne EA, Gardner DE (1978) Influence of cadmium, nickel and chromium on primary immunity in mice. Environ Res 16: 77–87Google Scholar
  18. Hill CH (1979) Dietary influence on resistance to Salmonella infection in chicks. Fed Proc 38: 2129–2133Google Scholar
  19. Hochrainer D, Stöber W (1978) A Stöber-rotor with recirculation of particle-free air. Amer Industr Hyg Ass J 39: 754–757Google Scholar
  20. IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer (1973) Chromium and inorganic chromium compounds. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Vol 2, IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarstrand C, Lundborg M, Wiernik A, Camner P (1978) Alveolar macrophage function in nickel dust exposed rabbits. Toxicology 11: 353–358Google Scholar
  22. Johansson A, Lundborg M, Hellström PA et al. (1980) Effect of iron, cobalt, and chromium dust on rabbit alveolar macrophages. A comparison with the effects of nickel dust. Environ Res 21: 165–176Google Scholar
  23. Johansson A, Camner P, Jarstrand C, Wiernik A (1983) Rabbit lungs after long-term exposure to low nickel dust concentration. II. Effects on morphology and function. Environ Res 30: 142–151Google Scholar
  24. Jones RH, Williams RL, Jones AM (1971) Effects of heavy metals on the immune response. Preliminary findings for cadmium in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 137: 1231–1236Google Scholar
  25. Kazantzis G (1978) The role of hypersensitivity and immune response in influencing susceptibility to metal toxicity. Environ. Health Perspect 25: 11–118Google Scholar
  26. Koller LD (1973) Immunosuppression produced by lead, cadmium and mercury. Am J Vet Res 34: 1457–1458Google Scholar
  27. Koller LD, Exon JH, Roan JG (1975) Antibody suppression by cadmium. Arch Environ Health 30: 598–601Google Scholar
  28. Koller LD, Exon JH, Roan JG (1976) Humoral antibody response in mice after single dose exposure to lead or cadmium. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 151: 339–342Google Scholar
  29. Koller LD, Brauner JA (1977) Decreased B cell response after exposure to lead and cadmium. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 42: 621–624Google Scholar
  30. Koller LD, Roan JG (1980) Effects of lead, cadmium and methylmercury on immunological memory. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 4: 47–52Google Scholar
  31. Korallus U, Loenhoff N (1981) Arbeitsmedizinische und epidemiologische Erfahrungen mit der Herstellung und Verarbeitung von Chromaten. Arbeitsmed, Sozialmed Präventivmed 12: 285–289Google Scholar
  32. Korallus U, Harzdorf C, Lewalter J (1984) Experimental bases for ascorbic acid therapy of poisoning by hexavalent chromium compounds. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53: 247–256Google Scholar
  33. Kotz L, Kaiser G, Tschöpel P, Tölg G (1972) Aufschluß biologischer Matrizes für die Bestimmung sehr niedriger Spurenelementgehalte bei begrenzter Einwaage mit Salpetersäure, unter Druck in einem Teflongefäß. Z Anal Chem 260: 207–209Google Scholar
  34. Lindberg R, Hedenstierna G (1983) Chrome plating: Symptoms, findings in the upper airways, and effects on lung function. Arch Environ Health 38: 367–374Google Scholar
  35. Malave I, De Ruffino DT (1984) Altered immune response during cadmium administration in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 74: 46–56Google Scholar
  36. Mertz W (1969) Chromium occurence and function in biological systems. Physiol Rev 49: 163–239Google Scholar
  37. NAS National Academy of Science (1974) Chromium Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. Norseth T (1981) The carcinogenicity of chromium. Environ Health Perspect 40: 121–130Google Scholar
  39. Reggiani A, Lotti M, De Rosa E, Saia B (1973) Alterazoni funzionali respiratori in soggetti esposti al cromo. Nota 1. Alterazioni spirografiche Lav Umano 25: 23–27Google Scholar
  40. Smialowicz RJ, Rogers RR, Riddle MM, Scott GA (1984) Immunologic effects of nickel. I. Suppression of cellular and humoral immunity. Environ Res 33: 413–427Google Scholar
  41. Spallholz JE, Martin JL, Gerlach MC, Heinzerling RH (1973) Enhanced immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibody titers in mice fed selenium. Infect Immun 8: 841–842Google Scholar
  42. Spallholz JE, Martin JL, Gerlach MC, Heinzerling RH (1975) Effect on the primary immune response of mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 148: 37–40Google Scholar
  43. Spiegelberg T, Kördel W, Hochrainer D (1984) Effects of NiO-inhalation on alveolar-macrophages and the humoral immune system of rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 8: 516–525Google Scholar
  44. Strong DM, Ahmed AA, Sher J, Knudson RC, Sell KW (1974) Specificy of in vitro murine B cell activation by protein and polysaccharide polymers. J Immunol 111: 1429–1437Google Scholar
  45. Sunderman FW Jr (1976) A review of the carcinogenicities of nickel, chromium and arsenic compounds in man and animals. Preventive Medicine 5: 279–294Google Scholar
  46. Thormann J, Jespersen NB, Joensen HD (1979) Persistence of contact allergy to chromium. Contact Dermatis 5: 261–264Google Scholar
  47. Treagan L (1975) Metals and the immune response. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 12: 189–220Google Scholar
  48. VDI-Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (1975) VDI-Richtlinie 2066, Blatt 1: Messen von Partikeln, Staubmessungen in strömenden Gasen. Gravimetrische Bestimmung der Staubbeladung. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, KölnGoogle Scholar
  49. Waters MD, Gardner DE, Aranyi C (1975) Metal toxicity for rabbit alveolar macrophages in vitro. Environ Res 9: 32–47Google Scholar
  50. White LR, Marthinsen ABL, Jakobsen K, Eik-Nes KB (1983) Response of bovine alveolar macrophages in vitro to welding fume particles. Environ Health Perspect 51: 211–215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Glaser
    • 1
  • D. Hochrainer
    • 1
  • H. Klöppel
    • 1
  • H. Kuhnen
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für Umweltchemie und OekotoxikologieSchmallenberg-GrafschaftFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations