Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi)

Implications for seasonal sexual dimorphism
  • S. Boinski


The mating system of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) in Parque Nacional Corcovado, Costa Rica was studied and used to develop a model to interpret the evolution of seasonal sexual dimorphism in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri spp.). Adult male body weights in captivity and the wild may increase more than 20%, beginning approximately two months prior to and continuing through the annual two month, breeding season. Female inter-troop transfer was common in the study population, but male troop residence was stable. Instances of agression among adult males in the troop, even in sexual contexts, were rare. Reproductively mature males enlarged to varying degrees by the start of the breeding season and cooperated in mobbing females to olfactorily evaluate female, estrous condition. Female mate preference corresponded to a ranking based on relative male enlargement. The largest male obtained 70% of the copulations observed in the 1984 breeding season. Little evidence exists that females typically mate with more than one male during the period of peak receptivity. Seasonal enlargement in males is suggested to be the result, of both male intrasexual competition and female choice.


Breeding Season Squirrel Monkey Large Male Mate Preference Female Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–107Google Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ (1985) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Experientia 41:1296–1310Google Scholar
  3. Boake RB (1986) A method for testing adaptive hypotheses of mate choice. Am Nat 127:654–666Google Scholar
  4. Boinski S (1986) The ecology of squirrel monkeys in Costa Rica. Unpublished Ph D dissertation, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  5. Boinski S, Scott PE (1987) Association of birds and monkeys in Costa Rica. Biotropica (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Busse CD (1985) Paternity recognition in multi-male primate groups. Am Zool 25:873–881Google Scholar
  7. Chen JJ, Smith ER, Gray GD, Davidson JM (1981) Seasonal changes in plasma testosterone and ejaculatory capacity in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Primates 22:253–260Google Scholar
  8. Coe CL, Rosenblum LA (1978) Annual reproductive strategy of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Folia Primatol 29:19–42Google Scholar
  9. Coe CL, Mendoza SP, Levine S (1979) Social status constrains the stress response in the squirrel monkey. Physiol Behav 23:633–638Google Scholar
  10. Coe CL, Smith ER, Mendoza SP, Levine S (1983) Varying influence of social status on hormone levels in male squirrel monkeys. In: Kling AS, Steklis HD (eds) Hormones, drugs, and social behaviors. Spectrum, New York, pp 7–32Google Scholar
  11. Coe CL, Smith ER, Levine S (1985) The endocrine system of the squirrel monkey. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–218Google Scholar
  12. Dukelow WR (1985) Reproductive cyclicity and breeding in the squirrel monkey. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 169–190Google Scholar
  13. DuMond FV (1968) The squirrel monkey in a seminatural environment. In: Rosenblum LA, Cooper RW (eds) The squirrel monkey. Academic Press, New York, pp 87–145Google Scholar
  14. DuMond FV, Hutchinson TC (1967) Squirrel monkey reproduction: the “fatted” male phenomenon and seasonal spermatogenesis. Science 197:863–864Google Scholar
  15. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox MW (1972) Socio-ecological implications of individual differences in wolf litters: a developmental and evolutionary perspective. Behaviour 46:298–313Google Scholar
  17. Goldman ES, Coe CL, Murai JT, Siiteri PK (1983) Corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG) response to estrogens and aromatase (estrogen synthetase) activity in squirrel monkeys. Endocrine Society Abstracts, 65th Meeting, San Antonio, TexasGoogle Scholar
  18. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  19. Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV (1981) Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55–57Google Scholar
  20. Hartshorn GS (1983) Plants: introduction. In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 118–157Google Scholar
  21. Hennessy MB, Coe CL, Mendoza SP, Lowe EL, Levine S (1978) Scent-marking and olfactory investigatory behavior in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Behav Biol 24:57–67Google Scholar
  22. Hershkovitz P (1984) Taxonomy of squirrel monkeys genus Saimiri (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary report with a description of a hitherto unnamed form. Am J Primat 7:155–210Google Scholar
  23. Herwitz SR (1981) Regeneration of selected tropical tree species in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Univ Calif Publ Geog, Vol 24Google Scholar
  24. Janson CH (1984) Female choice and mating system of the brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). Z Tierpsychol 65:177–200Google Scholar
  25. Kaack B, Walker M, Walker L (1980) Seasonal changes in the thyroid hormones of the male squirrel monkey. Arch Androl 42:133–136Google Scholar
  26. Kenagy GJ, Trombulak SC (1986) Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J Mamm 67:1–24Google Scholar
  27. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 34:292–305Google Scholar
  28. Kirkpatrick M (1986) The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work. Am Nat 127:788–810Google Scholar
  29. Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–305Google Scholar
  30. Leger DW, Mason WA, Fragaszy DM (1981) Sexual segregation, cliques, and social power in squirrel monkey (Saimiri) groups. Behaviour 76:163–180Google Scholar
  31. Mendoza SP, Lowe EL, Davidson JM, Levine S (1978a) Annual cyclicity in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus): the relationship between testosterone, fatting, and sexual behavior. Horm Behav, 11:295–303Google Scholar
  32. Mendoza SP, Lowe EL, Resko JL, Levine S (1978b) Seasonal variations in gonadal hormones and social behavior in squirrel monkeys. Physiol Behav 20:515–522Google Scholar
  33. Milton K (1985) Mating patterns of woolly spider monkeys, Brachyteles arachnoides: implications for female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:53–59Google Scholar
  34. Packer, C (1979) Male dominance and reproductive activity in Papio anubis. Anim Behav 27:37–45Google Scholar
  35. Rosenblum LA, Cooper RW (1968) The squirrel monkey. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (1985) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Stephenson GR (1974) Social structure of mating, activity in Japanese macaques. In: Kondo S, Kawai M, Kawamura S (eds) Symp 5th Congr Int'l Primat. Soc. Japan Science Press, Tokyo, pp 63–115Google Scholar
  38. Thorington RW, Jr (1985) The taxonomy and distribution of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri). In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  39. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  40. Weibe RH, Diamond E, Askel S, Liu MD, Abee CR (1984) Diurnal variations of androgens in sexually mature Bolivian squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) during the breeding season. Am J Primatol 7:291–297Google Scholar
  41. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Boinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations