Advertisement

Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry

, Volume 338, Issue 5, pp 610–614 | Cite as

Determination of chlorinated hydrocarbons in single and multi component test gases

  • U. Giese
  • H. Stenner
  • E. Ludwig
  • A. Kettrup
Original Papers Environmental Analyses

Summary

For comparing the efficiency of active and diffusive sampling methods two diffusive samplers with different properties were used to determine chlorinated hydrocarbons (CH2Cl2, CHCl3, CCl4) in single and multi component test gas mixtures. One of the chosen diffusive samplers can also be used for active sampling.

In general, good correlations of all tested methods could be observed in the direct comparison of active and diffusive sampling and in the determination of the efficiencies.

During the application of active and diffusive sampling methods in multi component test gases of the analytes possible interferences could not be ascertained.

Keywords

Physical Chemistry Analytical Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Hydrocarbon Chlorinate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Henschler D (1989) Maximale Arbeitsplatzkonzentrationen und Biologische Arbeitsstofftoleranzwerte, Mitteilung XXIV der Senatskommission zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe der DFG, Verlag Chemie, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siekmann H, Blome H, Heisig W (1988) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 48:89–94Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siekmann H (1985) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 45:501–505Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Otson R, Williams DT, Bothwell PD (1983) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 44:489–494Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guenier JP, Muller J (1984) Am Occup Hyg 28:61–75Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blome H, Hennig M (1985) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 45:505–508Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blome H, Hennig M (1985) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 45:541–546Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blome H, Hennig M (1986) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 46:6–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Einfeld W (1983) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 44:29–35Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berlin A, Brown RH, Saunders KJ (1987) Publication No. 10555 EN of the Commission of the European Communities, Diffusive Sampling — An alternative Approach to workplace Air Monitoring: The Proceedings of an International Symposium held in Luxembourg, 22.–26. Sept. 1986, Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lautenberger WJ, Kring EV, Morello JA (1980) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:737–747Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pozoly L, Cottica D (1987) In: Berlin A, Brown RH, Saunders KJ, Publication No. 10555 EN of the Commission of the European Communities, Diffusive Sampling — An alternative Approach to workplace Air Monitoring: The Proceedings of an International Symposium held in Luxembourg, 22.–26. Sept. 1986, Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fa. Dräger: Gebrauchsanleitung zum Orsa 5Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pannwitz KH (1981) Orsa 5 — Ein neuer Probenehmer für organische Lösemitteldämpfe. Sonderdruck GT 56 aus dem Drägerheft 321Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dupont Pro Tek G-AA/G-BB Organic Vapor Air monitoring Badges, Operating Manual (1981)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weber H, Stenner H, Kettrup A (1986) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 325:64–67Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weber H, Stenner H, Giese U, Kettrup A (1986) Chemie-Technik 15: No. 6, 86–90Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giese U, Stenner H, Kettrup A (1989) Staub Reinhaltung Luft 49:159–164Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giese U, Stenner H, Kettrup A (1989) unpublishedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giese U (1988) Dissertation, Diffusionsprobenahme von chlorierten Kohlenwasserstoffen in Mehrkomponentenprüfgasen, Universität-GH PaderbornGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dommer RA, Melcher RG (1978) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 39:240–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Giese
    • 1
  • H. Stenner
    • 1
  • E. Ludwig
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Kettrup
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Angewandte ChemieUniversität-GH PaderbornPaderbornFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.GSF, Institute of Ecological ChemistryNeuherbergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations