Oecologia

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 543–552 | Cite as

Fluctuating food supply affects the clutch size of Tengmalm's owl independent of laying date

  • Erkki Korpimäki
  • Harri Hakkarainen
Original Papers

Summary

In western Finland, yearly median laying dates of Tengmalm's owls varied from 14 March to 27 April during 1973–1989 and were negatively correlated with the winter densities of voles. Yearly mean clutch sizes varied from 4.0 to 6.7 and were more closely related to the spring than to the winter densities of voles. The yearly mean clutch size decreased with yearly median laying date. The 3-year vole population cycle is typical of the study area. The start of egg-laying was earliest in the peak phase of the cycle (median laying date 22 March), when vole numbers are high during egg-laying, but decline rapidly to low numbers in the next autumn or winter. In the increase phase (1 April) vole abundances are moderate at the time of laying, but increase to a peak in the next autumn or winter. In the low phase (15 April) voles are scarce in spring and in the preceding winter, starting to increase in late summer. Clutch size and female body mass were independent of laying date in the low phase, decreased slowly but significantly in the increase phase, and declined abruptly in the peak phase. These trends also held when the effects of territory quality, female age and male age were ruled out. When comparing the same laying periods, clutch sizes were significantly larger in the increase than in other phases of the cycle, but there was no difference between the peak and low phases. Supplementary feeding prior to and during egg-laying increased clutch size independent of laying date. These results agreed with the “income” model (the rate of energy supply during laying determines clutch size). Tengmalm's owls invest most in a clutch in the increase phase, as the reproductive value of eggs is largest because of high survival of yearlings. A high reproductive effort may be adaptive during this phase, because the availability of voles is predictable during the laying period.

Key words

Tengmalm's owl Laying date Clutch size Population fluctuations of voles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelstam P, Lindström E, Widen P (1985) Synchronous shortterm population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia — occurrence and distribution. Holarct Ecol 8:285–298Google Scholar
  2. Arcese P, Smith JNM (1988) Effects of population density and supplemental food on reproduction in song sparrows. J Anim Ecol 57:119–136Google Scholar
  3. Daan S, Dijkstra C (1988) Date of birth and reproductive value of kestrel eggs: on the significance of early breeding. In: Dijkstra C, Reproductive tactics in the kestrel Falco tinnunculus. Unpubl Ph D thesis, Dept Zool, Univ Groningen, The Netherlands, pp 85–114Google Scholar
  4. Daan S, Dijkstra C, Drent R, Meijer T (1989) Food supply and the annual timing of avian reproduction. Proc Int Ornith Congr 19:392–407Google Scholar
  5. Davies NB, Lundberg A (1985) The influence of food on time budgets and timing of breeding in the Dunnock Prunella modularis. Ibis 127:100–110Google Scholar
  6. Dijkstra C, Daan S, Meijer T, Cavè AJ, Foppen RPB (1988) Daily and seasonal variations in body mass of the kestrel in relation to food availability and reproduction. Ardea 76:127–140Google Scholar
  7. Drent R, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252Google Scholar
  8. Finerty JP (1980) The population ecology of cycles in small mammals. Mathematical theory and biological fact. Yale Univ Press, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol 9. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodman D (1979) Regulating reproductive effort in a changing environment. Am Nat 113:735–748Google Scholar
  11. Haartman L von (1971) Population dynamics. In: Farner D, King JR (eds) Avian biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 391–459Google Scholar
  12. Hansson L (1972) Evaluation of the small quadrate method of censusing small mammals. Ann Zool Fenn 9:184–190Google Scholar
  13. Hansson L (1984) Winter reproduction of small mammals in relation to food conditions and population dynamics. Bull Carn Mus Nat Hist 10:225–234Google Scholar
  14. Hansson L, Henttonen H (1985) Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover. Oecologia 67:394–402Google Scholar
  15. Hansson L, Henttonen H (1988) Rodent dynamics as community process. Trends Ecol Evol 3:195–200Google Scholar
  16. Hansson L, Hoffmeyer I (1973) Snap and live trap efficiency for south Scandinavian small mammals. Oikos 24:477–478Google Scholar
  17. Hirons CJM, Hardy AR, Stanley PI (1984) Body weight, gonad development and moult in the Tawny owl (Strix aluco). J Zool Lond 202:145–164Google Scholar
  18. Hirschfield MF, Tinkle DW (1975) Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 72:2227–2231Google Scholar
  19. IlmatieteenIaitos (1972–1989) Kuukausikatsaus Suomen ilmastoon. Marras-huhtikuu. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  20. Keith LB (1963) Wildlife's ten-year cycle. Univ Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  21. Klomp H (1970) The determination of clutch size in birds. A review. Ardea 58:1–121Google Scholar
  22. Korpimäki E (1981) On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) in Southern Ostrobothnia and Suomenselkä, western Finland. Acta Univ Oul A 118. Biol 13:1–84Google Scholar
  23. Korpimäki E (1986a) Seasonal changes in the food of Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus in western Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 23:339–344Google Scholar
  24. Korpimäki E (1986b) Predation causing synchronous decline phases in microtine and shrew populations in western Finland. Oikos 46:124–127Google Scholar
  25. Korpimäki E (1987a) Timing of breeding of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus in relation to vole dynamics in western Finland. Ibis 129:58–68Google Scholar
  26. Korpimäki E (1987b) Clutch size, breeding success and brood size experiments in Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus: a test of hypotheses. Ornis Scand 18:277–284Google Scholar
  27. Korpimäki E (1987c) Selection for nest-hole shift and tactics of breeding dispersal in Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus. J Anim Ecol 56:185–196Google Scholar
  28. Korpimäki E (1988a) Diet of breeding Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: long-term changes and year-to-year variation under cyclic food conditions. Ornis Fenn 65:21–30Google Scholar
  29. Korpimäki E (1988b) Effects of territory quality on occupancy, breeding performance and breeding dispersal in Tengmalm's owl. J Anim Ecol 57:97–108Google Scholar
  30. Korpimäki E (1988c) Effects of age on breeding performance of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus in western Finland. Ornis Scand 19:21–26Google Scholar
  31. Korpimäki E (1989) Breeding performance of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus: effects of supplementary feeding in a peak vole year. Ibis 131:51–56Google Scholar
  32. Korpimäki E (1990a) Body mass of breeding Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: seasonal, between-year, site and age-related variation. Ornis Scand 21:169–178Google Scholar
  33. Korpimäki E (1990b) Low repeatability of laying date and clutch size in Tengmalm's Owl: an adaptation to fluctuating food conditions. Ornis Scand 21 (in press)Google Scholar
  34. Korpimäki E, Lagerström M (1988) Survival and natal dispersal of fledglings of Tengmalm's owl in relation to fluctuating food conditions and hatching date. J Anim Ecol 57:433–441Google Scholar
  35. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1989) Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 2: impact on small mustelid and microtine dynamics —a hypothesis. Oikos 55:273–280Google Scholar
  36. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Meijer T, Daan S, Dijkstra C (1988) Female condition and reproduction: effects of food manipulation in free-living and captive kestrels. Ardea 76:141–154Google Scholar
  38. Murphy EC, Haukioja E (1986) Clutch size in nidicolous birds. In: Johnston RF (ed) Current Ornithology, vol. 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 141–180Google Scholar
  39. Myllymäki A (1977) Demographic mechanism in the fluctuating populations of the Field Vole Microtus agrestis. Oikos 28:468–493Google Scholar
  40. Neuvonen S (1988) Interactions between geometrid and microtine cycles in northern Fennoscandia. Oikos 51:393–397Google Scholar
  41. Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. Poyser, BerkhamstedGoogle Scholar
  42. Newton I (1986) The Sparrowhawk. Poyser, CaltonGoogle Scholar
  43. Newton I, Marquiss M (1984) Seasonal trends in the breeding performance of sparrowhawks. J Anim Ecol 53:809–829Google Scholar
  44. Newton I, Marquiss M, Village A (1983) Weights, breeding, and survival in European Sparrowhawks. Auk 100:344–354Google Scholar
  45. Perrins CM (1970) The timing of bird's breeding seasons. Ibis 112:242–255Google Scholar
  46. Pietiäinen H (1988) Breeding season quality, age, and the effect of experience on the reproductive success of the Ural Owl (Strix uralensis). Auk 105:316–324Google Scholar
  47. Village A (1986) Breeding performance of kestrels at Eskdalemuir, south Scotland. J Zool Lond 208:367–378Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkki Korpimäki
    • 1
  • Harri Hakkarainen
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ecological Zoology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurku 50Finland
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Konnevesi Research StationUniversity of JyväskyläKonnevesiFinland

Personalised recommendations