, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 278–288

The costs of crest induction for Daphnia carinata

  • Michael J. Barry
Original Paper


The effects of notonectid-induced crests on growth and reproduction, and resource allocation to crest construction, moult losses and eggs of Daphnia carinata were measured. An attempt was made to elucidate the mechanisms of physiological costs of crest induction for this species. The crested morph of d. carinata reached a significantly larger size than the uncrested form. Reproductive output was similar in early instars, but the crested morph produced more eggs in latter broods. Instar duration was longer for the crested morph and age at first reproduction was delayed. Survival was also lower in this form. Crest construction required significant resources (equivalent to 60 eggs over a life time) but evidence is presented that these resources were obtained primarily by re-allocation of available material rather than collection of extra resources. The crested morph allocated significantly more resources to moulting than its uncrested counter-parts. The uncrested morph produced large eggs in early instars and progressively smaller ones in later instars. The crested morph produced only small eggs. The hypothesis is presented that the crest-induction strategy of D. carinata involves at least two separate sets of responses, each with its own costs and trade-offs. The first response is production of the crest. The cost of crest production is an increased cost of moulting. D. carinata off sets this cost by increasing instar duration and thus age at reproduction. The second response is increased size. D. carinata achieves this by reducing the fraction of available resources allocated to reproduction. The cost is lower reproductive output.

Key words

Daphnia Crest induction Energetic costs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barry MJ (1990) Studies on the ecology of Daphnia carinata with particular reference to induction of crests by Anisops predators. PhD Thesis, Monash UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry MJ, Bayly IAE (1985) Further studies on predator induction of crests in Australian Daphnia and the effects of crests on predation. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 36:519–535Google Scholar
  3. Black AR, Dodson SI (1990) Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 83:117–122Google Scholar
  4. Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Cock AG (1966) Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q Rev Biol 41:131–190Google Scholar
  6. Cole LC (1954) The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol 29:103–137Google Scholar
  7. Dodson SI (1974) Adaptive change in zooplankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: A new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol Oceanogr 19:721–729Google Scholar
  8. Dodson SI (1988a) Cyclomorphosis in Daphnia galeata mendotae Birge and D. retrocurva Forbes as a predator-induced response. Freshwater Biol 19:109–114Google Scholar
  9. Dodson SI (1988b) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator avoidance behavior in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1431–1439Google Scholar
  10. Dodson SI (1989) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia 78:361–367Google Scholar
  11. Dodson SI, Havel JE (1988) Indirect prey effects: some morphological and life history responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to Notonecta undulata. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1274–1285Google Scholar
  12. Dorazio RM, Lehman JT (1983) Optimal reproductive strategies in age-structured populations of zooplankton. Freshwater Biol 13:157–175Google Scholar
  13. Egloff DA (1968) The relative growth and seasonal variation of several cyclomorphic structures of Daphnia catawba Coker in natural populations. Archiv Hydrobiol 65:325–359Google Scholar
  14. Grant JWG, Bayly IAE (1981) Predator induction of crests in morphs of the Daphnia carinata complex. Limnol Oceanogr 26:201–218Google Scholar
  15. Green J (1956) Growth, size and reproduction in Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). Proc R Soc London 126:173–205Google Scholar
  16. Havel JE (1985) Predation of common invertebrate predators on long- and short-featured Daphnia retrocurva. Hydrobiologia 124:141–149Google Scholar
  17. Havel JE (1986) Predator-induced defences: a review. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts of aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover London, pp 263–277Google Scholar
  18. Havel JE, Dodson SI (1985) Environmental cues of cyclomorphosis in Daphnia retrocurva Forbes. Freshwater Biol 15:469–478Google Scholar
  19. Havel JE, Dodson SI (1987) Reproductive costs of Chaoborus-induced polymorphism in Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia 150:273–281Google Scholar
  20. Hazelwood DH (1966) Illumination and turbulence effects on relative growth in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 11:212–216Google Scholar
  21. Hebert PDN (1978a) Cyclomorphosis in natural populations of Daphnia cephalata King. Freshwater Biol 8:79–90Google Scholar
  22. Hebert PDN (1978b) The adaptive significance of cyclomorphosis in Daphnia: more possibilities. Freshwater Biol 8:313–320Google Scholar
  23. Hebert PDN, Grewe PM (1985) Chaoborus-induced shifts in the morphology of Daphnia ambigua. Limnol Oceanogr 30:1291–1297Google Scholar
  24. Hutchinson EH (1967) A treatise on limnology, volume 2: introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs J (1962) Light and turbulence as co-determinants of relative growth in cyclomorphic Daphnia. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 47:146–156Google Scholar
  26. Jacobs J (1967) Untersuchungen zur Funktion and Evolution der Zyklomorphose bei Daphnia mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Selektion durch Fische. Archiv Hydrobiol 62:467–541Google Scholar
  27. Jacobs J (1987) Cyclomorphosis in Daphnia. In: Peters RH, Bernardi R de (eds) Daphnia. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol 45: 325–352Google Scholar
  28. Keating KI (1985) A system of defined (sensu stricto) media for daphnid (Cladocera) culture. Water Res 19:73–78Google Scholar
  29. Kenkataraman K, Krishnaswamy S (1986) Anisops bouvieri predation and advantages of cephalic expansion in Daphnia cephalata King and the impact of predation on Daphnia similis Clus under laboratory conditions. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Anim Sci) 95:509–513Google Scholar
  30. Ketola M, Vuorinen I (1989) Modification of life-history parameters of Daphnia pulex Leydig and Daphnia magna Straus by the presence of Chaoborus sp. Hydrobiologia 179:149–155Google Scholar
  31. Krueger DA, Dodson SI (1981) Embryological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 26:219–223Google Scholar
  32. Lynch M (1980) The evolution of cladoceran life histories. Q Rev Biol 55:23–42Google Scholar
  33. Lynch M (1989) The life history consequences of resource depression in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 70:246–256Google Scholar
  34. Lynch M, Ennis R (1983) Resource availability, maternal effects and longevity. Exp Gerontol 18:147–165Google Scholar
  35. O'Brien WJ, Kettle D, Riessen H, Schnidt D, Wright D (1980) Dimorphic Daphnia longiremis: Predation and competitive interactions between two morphs. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, pp 497–505, New EnglandGoogle Scholar
  36. Pijanowska J (1990) Cyctomorphosis in Daphnia: an adaptation to avoid invertebrate predation. Hydrobiologia 198:41–50Google Scholar
  37. Reynolds JG, Geddes MC (1984) Functional response analysis of size-selective predation by the notonectid predator Anisops deanei (Brooks). Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 35:725–733Google Scholar
  38. Riessen HP (1984) The other side of cyclomorphosis: why Daphnia lose their helmets. Limnol Oceanogr 29:1123–1126Google Scholar
  39. Riessen HP, Sprules WG (1990) Demographic costs of antipredator defences in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71:1536–1546Google Scholar
  40. Stearns SC (1976) Life history tactics: a review of ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3–47Google Scholar
  41. Tessier AJ; Consolatti NL (1989) Variation in offspring size in Daphnia and consequences for individual fitness. Oikos 56:269–276Google Scholar
  42. Tessier AJ, Goulden CE (1982) Estimating food limitation in cladoceran populations. Limnol Oceanogr 27:707–727Google Scholar
  43. Tessier AJ, Henry LL, Goulden CE, Duband MW (1983) Starvation in Daphnia: energy reserves and reproductive allocation. Limnol Oceanogr 28:667–676Google Scholar
  44. Walls M, Ketola M (1989) Effects of predator-induced spines on individual fitness in D. pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 34:390–396Google Scholar
  45. Wesenburg-Lund C (1908) Plankton investigations of the Danish lakes. General part: the Baltic freshwater plankton, its origin and variation. Gyldenalske Boghandel, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  46. Winkler DW, Wallin K (1987) Offspring size and number: a life-history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat 129:708–720Google Scholar
  47. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis (2nd edn) Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  48. Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Barry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyMonash UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Key Centre for Applied and Nutritional ToxicologyRMITMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations