Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 171–178 | Cite as

Effects of plant size and water relations on gas exchange and growth of the desert shrub Larrea tridentata

  • A. C. Franco
  • A. G. de Soyza
  • R. A. Virginia
  • J. F. Reynolds
  • W. G. Whitford
Original Paper

Abstract

Larrea tridentata is a xerophytic evergreen shrub, dominant in the arid regions of the southwestern United States. We examined relationships between gasexchange characteristics, plant and soil water relations, and growth responses of large versus small shrubs of L. tridentata over the course of a summer growing season in the Chihuahuan Desert of southern New Mexico, USA. The soil wetting front did not reach 0.6 m, and soils at depths of 0.6 and 0.9 m remained dry throughout the summer, suggesting that L. tridentata extracts water largely from soil near the surface. Surface soil layers (<0.3 m) were drier under large plants, but predawn xylem water potentials were similar for both plant sizes suggesting some access to deeper soil moisture reserves by large plants. Stem elongation rates were about 40% less in large, reproductively active shrubs than in small, reproductively inactive shrubs. Maximal net photosynthetic rates (Pmax) occurred in early summer (21.3 μ mol m-2 s-1), when pre-dawn xylem water potential (XWP) reached ca. -1 MPa. Although both shrub sizes exhibited similar responses to environmental factors, small shrubs recovered faster from short-term drought, when pre-dawn XWP reached about -4.5 MPa and Pmax decreased to only ca. 20% of unstressed levels. Gas exchange measurements yielded a strong relationship between stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, and the relationship between leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit and stomatal conductance was found to be influenced by pre-dawn XWP. Our results indicate that stomatal responses to water stress and vapor pressure deficit are important in determining rates of carbon gain and water loss in L. tridentata.

Key words

Gas-exchange Larrea tridentata Phenology Stomatal conductance Water relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown JR, Archer S (1990) Water relations of a perennial grass and seedling versus adult woody plants in a subtropical savanna, Texas, USA. Oikos 57:366–374Google Scholar
  2. Cannon WA (1991) The root habits of desert plants. Carnegie Institution of Washington 131:1–96Google Scholar
  3. Cui M, Smith WK (1991) Photosynthesis, water relations and mortality in Abies lasiocarpa seedlings during natural establishment. Tree Physiol 8:37–46Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham GL, Syvertsen JP, Reynolds JF, Willson JM (1979) Some effects of soil-moisture availability on above-ground production and reproductive allocation in Larrea tridentata (DC) Cov. Oecologia 40:113–123Google Scholar
  5. Donovan LA, Ehleringer JR (1992) Contrasting water-use patterns among size and life-history classes of a semi-arid shrub. Functional Ecology 6:482–488Google Scholar
  6. Fisher FM, Zak JC, Cunningham GL, Whitford WG (1988) Water and nitrogen effects on growth and allocation patterns of creosotebush in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. J Range Manage 41:387–391Google Scholar
  7. Fonteyn PJ, Schlesinger WH, Marion GM (1987) Accuracy of soil thermocouple hygrometer measurements in desert ecosystems. Ecology 68:1121–1124Google Scholar
  8. Freckman DW, Virginia RA (1989) Plant-feeding nematodes in deep-rooting desert ecosystems. Ecology 70:1665–1678Google Scholar
  9. Kunkel KE, Malm NR, Earl RA (1990) Climate guide, Las Cruces 1851–1987. New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report No.623Google Scholar
  10. Lajtha K, Whitford WG (1989) The effect of water and nitrogen amendments on photosynthesis, leaf demography, and resource-use efficiency in Larrea tridentata, a desert evergreen shrub. Oecologia 80:341–348Google Scholar
  11. Ludwig JA (1977) Distributional adaptations of root systems in desert environments. In: Marshall JK (ed) The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes. Range Sci. Ser.26, Colorado State University, Fort Collins pp 85–91Google Scholar
  12. Meinzer FC, Rundel PW, Sharifi MR, Nilsen ET (1986) Turgor and osmotic relations of the desert shrub Larrea tridentata. Plant Cell Environ 9:467–475Google Scholar
  13. Meinzer FC, Sharifi MR, Nilsen ET, Rundel PW (1988) Effects of manipulation of water and nitrogen regime on the water relations of the desert shrub Larrea tridentata. Oecologia 77:480–486Google Scholar
  14. Monson RK, Smith SD (1982) Seasonal water potential components of Sonoran Desert plants. Ecology 63:113–123Google Scholar
  15. Mooney HA, Björkman O, Collatz GJ (1978) Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature in the desert shrub, Larrea divaricata. I. Carbon dioxide exchange characteristics of intact leaves. Plant Physiol 61:406–410Google Scholar
  16. Nash MH, Daugherty LA (1990) Soil-landscape relationships in alluvium sediments in southern New Mexico. New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No 746Google Scholar
  17. Nilsen ET, Sharifi MR, Rundel PW, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA (1983) Diurnal and seasonal water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) in the Sonoran Desert of California. Ecology 64:1381–1393Google Scholar
  18. Nulsen RA, Bligh KJ, Baxter IN, Solin EJ, Imrie DH (1986) The fate of rainfall in a mallee and heath vegetated catchment in southern West Australia. Aust J Ecol 11:361–371Google Scholar
  19. Odening WR, Strain BR, Oechel WC (1974) The effect of decreasing water potential on net CO2 exchange of intact desert shrubs. Ecology 55:1086–1095Google Scholar
  20. Oechel WC, Strain BR, Odening WR (1972a) Photosynthetic rates of a desert shrub, Larrea divaricata Cav., under field conditions. Photosynthetica 6:183–188Google Scholar
  21. Oechel WC, Strain BR, Odening WR (1972b) Tissue water potential, photosynthesis, 14C-labeled photosynthate utilization, and growth in the desert shrub Larrea divaricata Cav. Ecol Monogr 42:127–141Google Scholar
  22. Pressland AJ (1976) Soil moisture redistribution as affected by throughfall and stem flow in an arid zone shrub community. Aust J Bot 24:641–649Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds JF (1986) Adaptive strategies of desert shrubs with special reference to the creosotebush. In: Whitford WG (ed) Desert Ecology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque pp 19–49Google Scholar
  24. Schlesinger WH, Fonteyn PJ, Marion GM (1987) Soil moisture content and plant transpiration in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico. J Arid Environ 12:119–126Google Scholar
  25. Sharifi MR, Meinzer FC, Nilsen ET, Rundel PW, Virginia RA, Jarrel WM, Herman DJ, Clark PC (1988) Effect of the manipulation of water and nitrogen supplies on the quantitative phenology of Larrea tridentata (creosotebush) in the Sonoran Desert of California. Am J Bot 75:1163–1174Google Scholar
  26. Sheps LO (1973) Survival of Larrea tridentata S&M seedlings in Death Valley National Monument, California. Israel J Bot 22:8–17Google Scholar
  27. Smith WK (1978) Temperature of desert plants: another perspective on the adaptability of leaf size. Science 201:614–618Google Scholar
  28. Shreve F (1942) The desert vegetation of North America. Bot Rev 8:195–246Google Scholar
  29. Strain BR (1969) Seasonal adaptations in photosynthesis and respiration in four desert shrubs growing in situ. Ecology 50:511–513Google Scholar
  30. Strain BR (1970) Field measurements of tissue water potential and carbon dioxide exchange in the desert shrubs Prosopis juliflora and Larrea divaricata. Photosynthetica 4:118–122Google Scholar
  31. Syvertsen JP, Cunningham GL, Feather TV (1975) Anomalous patterns of stem xylem water potentials in Larrea tridentata. Ecology 56:1423–142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Franco
    • 1
  • A. G. de Soyza
    • 2
  • R. A. Virginia
    • 3
  • J. F. Reynolds
    • 4
  • W. G. Whitford
    • 5
  1. 1.Departamento de BotanicaUniversidade de BrasiliaBrasiliaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of BiologyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Studies ProgramDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  4. 4.Department of BotanyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  5. 5.USEPA Environmental Monitoring Systems LaboratoryLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations