Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 212, Issue 1, pp 182–190 | Cite as

Relative strengths of the 35S califlower mosaic virus, 1′, 2′, and nopaline synthase promoters in transformed tobacco sugarbeet and oilseed rape callus tissue

  • Mark H. Harpster
  • Jeffrey A. Townsend
  • Jonathan D. G. Jones
  • John Bedbrook
  • Pamela Dunsmuir


The 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus and promoters from the nopaline synthase, 1′ and 2′ genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA were fused to the bacterial octopine synthase and chitinase gene coding regions. These chimaeric gene constructions were introduced into tobacco, sugarbeet and oilseed rape cells and their relative levels of expression measured by primer extension analysis of RNA isolated from pooled populations of stably transformed calli. In tobacco callus, the 35S promoter provided the highest levels of gene expression, followed by the 2′, 1′ and nopaline synthase promoters. While the ranking of these promoters is conserved in sugarbeet and oilseed rape callus, there is between-species variation in the relative strength of these promoters. In all three species, transcription initiation is conserved for each of the chimaeric gene constructions. Additional constructions in which the 5′ untranslated leader of a petunia chlorophyll a/b binding protein gene is substituted for DNA downstream of the 35S transcription start site demonstrates that heterologous 5′ leader sequences can be utilized to augment steady-state levels of reporter gene expression

Key words

Promoter strength Transformed callus Chitinase gene Octopine synthase gene Agrobacterium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams TL, Townsend JA (1983) A new procedure for increasing efficiency of protoplast plating and clone selection. Plant Cell Rep 2:165–168Google Scholar
  2. An G (1986) Development of plant promoter expression vectors and their use for analysis of differential activity of nopaline synthase promoter in transformed tobacco cells. Plant Physiol 81:86–91Google Scholar
  3. Balazs E, Guilley H, Jonard G, Richards K (1982) Nucleotide sequence of DNA from an altered-virulence isolate D/H of the cauliflower mosaic virus. Gene 19:239–249Google Scholar
  4. Baumann G, Raschke E, Bevan M, Schoeffl F (1987) Functional analysis of sequences required for transcriptional activation of a soybean heat shock gene in transgenic tobacco plants. EMBO J 6:1155–1159Google Scholar
  5. Beachy RN, Chen ZL, Horsch RB, Rogers SB, Hoffmann NJ, Fraley RT (1985) Accumulation and assembly of soybean betaconglycinin in seeds of transformed petunia plants. EMBO J 4:3047–3053Google Scholar
  6. Bidney DL, Shepherd JF (1981) Phenotypic variation in plants regenerated from protoplasts: the potato system. In: Hodges A (ed) Vol. XXXIII, Wiley, New York, p 2961Google Scholar
  7. Comai L, Faccioti D, Hiatt WR, Thompson G, Rose RE, Stalker DM (1985) Expression in plants of a mutant aroA gene from Salmonella typhimurium confers resistance to glyphosphate. Nature 317:741–744Google Scholar
  8. DeGreve H, Dhaese P, Seurink J, Lemmers M, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Nucleotide sequence and transcript map of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti: plasmid-encoded octopine synthase gene. J Mol Appl Genet 1:499–511Google Scholar
  9. Depicker A, Stachel S, Dhase P, Zambryski P, Goodman HM (1982) Nopaline synthase: transcript mapping and DNA sequence. J Mol Appl Genet 1:561–573Google Scholar
  10. Dhaese P, DeGreve H, Decraemer H, Schell J, Van Montagu M (1979) Rapid mapping of transposon insertion and deletion mutations in the large Ti-plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1837–1849Google Scholar
  11. Dunsmuir P (1985) The petunia chlorophyll a/b binding protein genes: a comparison of Cab genes from different gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 13:2503–2518Google Scholar
  12. Dunsmuir P, Smith SM, Bedbrook J (1983) The major chlorophyll a/b binding protein of petunia is composed of several polypeptides encoded by a number of distinct nuclear genes. J Mol Appl Genet 2:285–300Google Scholar
  13. Dunsmuir P, Bond D, Lee K, Gidoni D, Townsend J (1987) Introduction, expression and analysis of genes in plants. In: Gelvin S, Schilperoort R (eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual, (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Figurski D, Helinski DR (1979) Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1648–1652Google Scholar
  15. Franck A, Guilley H, Jonard G, Richards K, Hirth L (1980) Nucleotide sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Cell 21:286–294Google Scholar
  16. Friedman AM, Long SR, Brown SF, Buiherra WJ, Ausubel FM (1982) Construction of a broad host range cosmid cloning vector and its use in the genetic analysis of Rhizobium mutants. Gene 18:289–294Google Scholar
  17. Fromm M, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1985) Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5824–5328Google Scholar
  18. Gallie DR, Sleat DE, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TMA (1987) The 5′-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 15:3257–3273Google Scholar
  19. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158Google Scholar
  20. Gardner RC, Howarth AJ, Hahn P, Brown-Luedi M, Shepherd RJ, Messing J (1981) The complete nucleotide sequence of an infectious clone of cauliflower mosaic virus by M13mp7 shotgun cloning. Nucleic Acids Res 9:2871–2888Google Scholar
  21. Gidoni D, Bond-Nutter D, Brosio P, Jones J, Redbrook J, Dunsmuir P (1987) Coordinated expression between two photosynthetic petunia genes in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 211:507–514Google Scholar
  22. Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykas PJJ, Shilperoort RA (1983) A binary vector plant strategy based on separation of vir and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-plasmid. Nature 303:179–180Google Scholar
  23. Herrera-Estrella L, DeBlock M, Messens E, Hernalsteens JP, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Chimeric genes as dominant selectable markers in plant cells. EMBO J 2:987–995Google Scholar
  24. Hull R (1980) Structure of the califower mosaic virus genome. III. Restriction endonuclease mapping of thirty-three isolates. Virology 100:76–90Google Scholar
  25. Hull R (1980) Viruses as vectors for plant genes. In: Dodds JH (ed) Plant Genetic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 95Google Scholar
  26. Hunt AG, Chu NM, Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1987) Plant cells do not properly recognize animal polyadenylation signals. Plant Mol Biol 8:23–35Google Scholar
  27. Jobling SA, Gehrke L (1987) Enhanced translation of chimaeric messenger RNAs containing a plant viral untranslated leader sequence. Nature 325:622–625Google Scholar
  28. Jones JDG, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J (1985) High level expression of introduced chimaeric genes in regenerated transformed plants. EMBO J 4:2411–2418Google Scholar
  29. Jones JDG, Grady KL, Suslow T, Bedbrook J (1986) Isolation and characterization of genes encoding chitinase genes from Serratia marcescens. EMBO J 5:467–473Google Scholar
  30. Koncz C, Kreuzaler F, Kalman Zs, Schell J (1984) A simple method to transfer, integrate and study expression of foreign genes, such as chicken ovalbumin and alpha-actin in plant tumors. EMBO J 3:1029–1037Google Scholar
  31. Kramer B, Kramer W, Fritz HJ (1984) Different base/base mismatches are corrected with different efficiencies by the methyldirected DNA mismatch-repair system of E. coli. Cell 38:879–887Google Scholar
  32. Kunkel T (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:488–492Google Scholar
  33. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. McKnight SL, Gavis ER, Kingsbury R, Axel R (1981) Analysis of transcriptional regulatory signals of the HSV thymidine kinase gene: identification of an upstream control region. Cell 25:385–398Google Scholar
  35. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
  36. Negrutiu I, Beeftink F, Jacobs M (1975) Arabidopsi thaliana as a model system in somatic cell genetics. I. Cell and tissue culture. Plant Sci Lett 5:293–298Google Scholar
  37. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua N-H (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313:810–812Google Scholar
  38. Rosahl S, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1987) Expression of a tuberspecific storage protein in transgenic tobacco plants: demonstration of an esterase activity. EMBO J 6:1155–1159Google Scholar
  39. Sanders PE, Winter JA, Barnason AR, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1987) Comparison of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and nopaline synthase promoters in transgenic plants. Nucleic Acids Res 15:1543–1558Google Scholar
  40. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467Google Scholar
  41. Schell J (1987) Transgenic plants as tools to study the molecular organization of plant genes. Science 237:1176–1183Google Scholar
  42. Simpson J, Schell J, Van Montgau M, Herrera-Estrella L (1986) Light-inducible and tissue-specific pea lhcp gene expression involves an upstream element combining enhancer- and silencer-like properties. Nature 323:551–554Google Scholar
  43. Taylor JL, Jones JDG, Sandler S, Mueller GM, Bedbrook JR, Dunsmuir P (1987) Optimizing the expression of a bacterial chitinase gene in plant cells. Mol Gen Genet 210:572–577Google Scholar
  44. Vaeck M, Reynaerts A, Hoefte H, Jansens S, DeBeukeleer M, Dean C, Zabeau M, Van Montagu M, Leemans J (1987) Transgenic plants protected from insect attack. Nature 328:33–37Google Scholar
  45. van den Elzen P, Lee KY, Townsend J, Bedbrook J (1985) Simple binary vectors for DNA transfer to plant cells. Plant Mol Biol 5:149–154Google Scholar
  46. Velten J, Schell J (1985) Selection-expression plasmid vectors for use in genetic transformation of higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res 13:6981–6998Google Scholar
  47. Velten J, Velten L, Hain R, Schell J (1984) Isolation of a dual promoter fragment from the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. EMBO J 12:2723–2730Google Scholar
  48. Vieira J, Messing J (1987) Production of single-stranded plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol 154 (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Winter JA, Wright RL, Gurley WB (1984) Map locations of five transcripts homologous to TR-DNA in tobacco and sunflower crown gall tumors. Nucleic Acid Res 12:2391–2406Google Scholar
  50. Zoller M (1984) Manual for advanced techniques in molecular cloning course. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Zoller M, Smith M (1982) Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis using M13-derived vectors: an efficient and general procedure for the production of point mutations in any fragment of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 10:6487–6500Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark H. Harpster
    • 1
  • Jeffrey A. Townsend
    • 1
  • Jonathan D. G. Jones
    • 1
  • John Bedbrook
    • 1
  • Pamela Dunsmuir
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Genetic Sciences Inc.OaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations