Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 410–415 | Cite as

Clutch size in a larval-pupal endoparasitoid

1. Variation across and within host species
  • L. E. M. Vet
  • A. Datema
  • K. van Welzen
  • H. Snellen
Original Papers

Abstract

Clutch size decisions by Aphaereta minuta (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a polyphagous, gregarious, larval-pupal endoparasitoid, were studied under laboratory conditions. This parasitoid attacks larvae of Diptera inhabiting ephemeral microhabitats such as decaying plant and animal material. Females oviposit in young larval stages, but the eventual size of the host pupa determines host food availability for competing offspring. The size of the pupa can differ greatly between host species. We questioned how A. minuta females deal with this delay between the moment of oviposition and eventual host food availability, and whether they make clutch size decisions that benefit their fitness. It was shown that females indeed vary their clutch size considerably and in an adaptive way: (1) females lay larger clutches in larvae of host species that produce larger pupae, even when the larvae are the same size at the moment of oviposition, and (2) females lay larger clutches in larger larvae than in smaller larvae of the same host species. The latter seems functional as larvae parasitized at an older stage indeed developed into larger pupae compared to larvae parasitized at a younger stage. Furthermore, mortality of parasitized young host larvae was greater than that of both unparasitized larvae and parasitized older larvae. Under field conditions the risk of mortality of young host larvae is expected to be even higher due to the limited period of microhabitat (host food) availability, strong scramble type competition between the host larvae, and the longer period of being exposed to predation.

Key words

Clutch size Parasitoid Aphaereta minuta Hymenoptera Braconidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckage NE, Riddiford LM (1983) Growth and development of the endoparasitic wasp Apanteles congregatus: dependence on host nutritional status and parasite load. Physiol Entomol 18: 231–241Google Scholar
  2. Cymborowski B (1992) Insect endocrinology Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Dijkstra LJ (1986) Optimal selection and exploitation of hosts in the parasitic wasp Colpoclypeus florus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Neth J Zool 36: 177–301Google Scholar
  4. Evans AC (1933) Comparative observations on the morphology and biology of some hymenopterous parasites of carrion-infesting Diptera. Bull Entomol Res 24: 385–405Google Scholar
  5. Godfray HCJ (1987) The evolution of clutch size in invertebrates. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 117–154Google Scholar
  6. Godfray HCJ, Partridge L, Harvey PH (1991) Clutch size. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22: 409–429Google Scholar
  7. Hardy ICW, Griffiths NT, Godfray HCJ (1992) Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J Anim Ecol 61: 121–129Google Scholar
  8. Houser EC, Wingo CW (1967) Aphaereta pallipes as a parasite of the face fly in Missouri, with notes on laboratory culture and biology. J Econ Entomol 60: 731–733Google Scholar
  9. Klomp H, Teerink BJ (1962) The significance of oviposition rate in the egg parasite Trichogramma embryophagum Htg. Arch Neerl Zool 17: 350–375Google Scholar
  10. Lenteren JC van (1981) Host discrimination by parasitoids. In: Nordlund DA, Jones RL, Lewis WJ (eds) Semiochemicals. Wiley, New York, pp 153–179Google Scholar
  11. Luck RF, Podoler H, Kfir R (1982) Host selection and egg allocation behaviour by Aphytis melinus and A. lingnanensis: A comparison of two facultatively gregarious parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 7: 397–408Google Scholar
  12. Masurier AD le (1987) A comparative study of the relationship between host size and brood size in Apanteles spp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ecol Entomol 12: 383–393Google Scholar
  13. Neser S (1973) Biology and behaviour of Euplectrus near laphygmae Ferriere (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Entomol Mem Dept Agric Tech Serv S Afr 32: 1–31Google Scholar
  14. Salkeld EH (1959) Notes on anatomy, life-history, and behaviour of Aphaereta pallipes (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of the onion maggot, Hylemia antiqua (Meig.). Can Entomol 91: 93–97Google Scholar
  15. Salt GC (1961) Competition between insect parasites. Symp Soc Exp Biol 15: 96–119Google Scholar
  16. Sato Y, Tanaka T (1984) Effect of the number of parasitoid wasp eggs (Apanteles kariyai) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the growth of the host (Leucania separata) larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomophaga 29: 21–28Google Scholar
  17. Sato Y, Tagawa J, Hidaka T (1986) Effects of the gregarious parasitoids, Apanteles rufricus and A. kariyai, on host growth and development. J Insect Physiol 32: 281–286Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt JM, Smith JJB (1985) Host volume measurement by the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma minutum: the roles of curvature and surface area. Entomol Exp Appl 39: 213–221Google Scholar
  19. Slansky F (1986) Nutritional ecology of endoparasitic insects and their hosts: an overview. J Insect Physiol 32: 255–261Google Scholar
  20. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. Sychevskaya VI (1964) Hymenopterous parasites of synanthropic flies in Soviet Central Asia. Entomol Rev 43: 199–206Google Scholar
  22. Takagi M (1986) The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid, Pteromalus puparium (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). 2. Host size discrimination and regulation of the number and sex ratio of progeny in a single host. Oecologia 70: 321–325Google Scholar
  23. Vet LEM, Alphen JJM van (1985) A comparative functional approach to the host detection behaviour of parasitic wasps. 1. A qualitative study on Eucoilidae and Alysiinae. Oikos 44: 478–486Google Scholar
  24. Wylie HG (1967) Some effects of host size on Nasonia vitripennis and Muscidiforax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Can Entomol 99: 742–748Google Scholar
  25. Zinov'eva KB (1974) Stimulation of pupation of larvae of Calliphora vicina R.-D. (Diptera, Calliphoridae) by the parasite Aphaereta minuta Nees (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 216: 702–703Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. M. Vet
    • 1
  • A. Datema
    • 1
  • K. van Welzen
    • 1
  • H. Snellen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations