, Volume 96, Issue 4, pp 451–456 | Cite as

The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance

  • G. Philip Robertson
  • James R. Crum
  • Boyd G. Ellis
Original Papers


The spatial distributions of selected soil properties in two adjacent sites in southwest Michigan were examined to evaluate the potential effects of chronic disturbance on resource heterogeneity. One site was a cultivated field that had been cleared, plowed, and cropped annually for decades prior to sampling while the other, uncultivated field was cleared of original forest in 1960 after which it was mown annually but never plowed or cropped. We took replicate samples from a 330-point unaligned grid across the sites for soil pH, gravimetric moisture, inorganic phosphorus, total carbon, and net nitrification and nitrogen mineralization potentials. Soils in the cultivated site contained less than half as much carbon as in the uncultivated site, but had higher levels of inorganic phosphorus and moisture, and higher soil pH. Potential net nitrogen mineralization and nitrification rates did not differ between sites. Geostatistical analysis showed that almost all properties examined were strongly autocorelated within each site; structural variance as a proportion of sample variance ranged from 30–95% for all properties, and for any given property differed little between sites. The distance over which this dependence was expressed, however, was for all properties but pH substantially less in the uncultivated site (7–26 m) as compared to the tilled site (48–108m), especially for total C and net nitrification and N mineralization. These results suggest that the spatial pattern and scale of soil variability can differ markedly among edaphically identical sites and that these differences can be related to disturbance history.

Key words

Soil nutrients Spatial variability Geostatistics Disturbance Nitrogen cycling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barner RJ (1991) The variogram sill and the sample variance. Math Geol 23:673–678Google Scholar
  2. Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) (1994) Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Academic Press, New York, USA (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Cressie NAC (1991) Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Gamma Design Software (1992) GS+: Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences. Gamma Design, Plainwell, Michigan USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Hook PB, Burke IC, Laurenroth WK (1991) Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 138:247–256Google Scholar
  6. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74:612–614Google Scholar
  8. Krige DG (1981) Lognormal-de Wijsian Geostatistics for Ore Evaluation. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Monograph Series, Geostatistics 1:1–51Google Scholar
  9. Mann LK (1986) Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation. Soil Science 142:279–288Google Scholar
  10. Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Schimel DS (1989) Regional extrapolation of trace gas flux based on soils and ecosystems. In: Andreae MO, Schimel DS (eds) Exchange of Trace Gases Between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Sec. Ed. American Society Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp 539–580Google Scholar
  12. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. p. 403–430 In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Second Ed. American Society Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Reinert DJ, Pierce FJ (1994) Temporal variation of soil physical properties induced by tillage. Soil Sci Soc Am J (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Robertson GP (1987) Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with knwon variance. Ecology 68:744–748Google Scholar
  15. Robertson GP, Gross KL (1994) Assessing the heterogeneity of belowground resources: quantifying scale. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Academic Press, New York, USA (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Robertson GP, Huston MA, Evans FC, Tiedje JM (1988) Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69:1517–1524Google Scholar
  17. Rossi RE, Mulla DJ, Journel AG, Franz EH (1992) Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol Monogr 62:277–314Google Scholar
  18. Ruzicka J, Hansen EH (1981) Flow Injection Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Stevenson FJ (1982) Origin and distribution of nitrogen in soil. p. 1–42 In: FJ Stevenson (ed) Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Tilman D (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Uehara G (1985) Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv Agron 38:45–94Google Scholar
  22. Warrick AW, Myers DE, Nielsen DR (1986) Geostatistical methods applied to soil science. p. 53–82 In: Klute A (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Webster R (1985) Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Adv Soil Sci 3:1–70Google Scholar
  24. Webster R, Nyborg M (1986) Effects of tillage and amendments on yields and selected soil properties of two solonetzic soils. Can J Soil Sci 66:455–470Google Scholar
  25. Webster R, Oliver MA (1990) Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  26. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441Google Scholar
  27. Whiteside EP, Schneider IF, Cook RL (1959) Soils of Michigan. Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station Special Bulletin 402, East Lansing, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Philip Robertson
    • 1
  • James R. Crum
    • 2
  • Boyd G. Ellis
    • 2
  1. 1.W.K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersUSA
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations