Oecologia

, Volume 87, Issue 4, pp 514–521

Are ant-aphid associations a tritrophic interaction? Oleander aphids and Argentine ants

  • C. M. Bristow
Original Papers

Summary

Oleander aphids, (Aphis nerii), which are sporadically tended by ants, were used as a moded system to examine whether host plant factors associated with feeding site influenced the formation of ant-aphid associations. Seasonal patterns of host plant utilization and association with attendant ants were examined through bi-weekly censuses of the aphid population feeding on thirty ornamental oleander plands (Nerium oleander) in northern California in 1985 and 1986. Colonies occurred on both developing and senescing plant terminals, including leaf tips, floral structures, and pods. Aphids preferentially colonized leaf terminals early in the season, but showed no preference for feeding site during later periods. Argentine ants (Iridomyrmex humilis) occasionally tended aphid colonies. Colonies on floral tips were three to four times more likely to attract ants than colonies on leaf tips, even though the latter frequently contained more aphids. Ants showed a positive recruitment response to colonies on floral tips, with a significant correlation between colony size and number of ants. There was no recruitment response to colonies on leaf tips. These patterns were reproducible over two years despite large fluctuations in both aphid population density and ant activity. In a laboratory bioassay of aphid palatability, the generalist predator,Hippodamia convergens, took significantly more aphids reared on floral tips compared to those reared on leaf tips. The patterns reported here support the hypothesis that tritrophic factors may be important in modifying higher level arthropod mutualisms.

Key words

Ant-aphid association Tritrophic interaction Oleander Argentine ants Aphis nerii 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addicott JF (1978) Competition for mutualists: aphids and ants. Can J Zool 56:2093–2096Google Scholar
  2. Aplin TEH (1976) Poisonous Garden Plants and Other Plants Harmful to Man in Australia. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Bulletin 3964. 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri MA, Annamalae S, Katiyar KP, Flath RA (1982) Effects of plant extracts on the rates of parasitization ofAnagasta kuehniella eggs byTrichogramma pretiosum under greenhouse conditions. Entomophaga 27:431–438Google Scholar
  4. Barbosa P, Letourneau DK (1988) Novel Aspects of Insect-Plant Interactions. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop YM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodenheimer FS, Swirski E (1957) The Aphidoidea of the Middle East. Weizmann Science Press of Israel, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  7. Botha CEJ, Evert RF, Walmsley RD (1975) Observations of the penetration of the phloem in leaves ofNerium oleander (Linn.) by stylets of the aphidAphis nerii (B. de F.). Protoplasma 86:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bristow CM (1984) Differential benefits from ant attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed. J Anim Ecol 53:715–726Google Scholar
  9. Bristow CM (1991) Why are so few aphids ant-tended? In: Cutler DF, Huxley C (eds) Ant/Plant Interactions. Oxford University Press (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Brower LP, Seiber JN, Nelson CJ, Lynch SP, Tuskes PM (1982) Plant-determined variation in the cardenolide content, thinlayer chromatography profiles and emetic potency of monarch butterflies,Danaus plexippus, reared on the milkweed,Asclepias eriocarpa, in California. J Chem Ecol 8:579–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckley R (1987) Ant-plant-Homopteran interactions. Adv Ecol Res 16:53–85Google Scholar
  12. Cavill GWK, Robertson PL, Davies NW (1979) An Argentine ant aggregation factor. Experientia 35:889–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cushman JH, Addicott JF (1989) Intra-and interspecific competition for mutualists: ants as a limited and limiting resource for aphids. Oecologia 79:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cushman JH, Whitham TG (1989) Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age-specific, and density-dependent effects. Ecology 70:1040–1047Google Scholar
  15. Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The selforganizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3:159–168Google Scholar
  16. Dixon AFG (1985) Aphid Ecology. Blackie, Glasgow, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewart WH, Metcalf RL (1956) Preliminary studies of sugars and amino acids in the honeydews of five species of coccids feeding on citrus in California. Ann Entomol Soc Am 49:441–447Google Scholar
  18. Flanders SE (1951) The role of the ant in the biological control of Homopterous insects. Can Entomol 83:93–98Google Scholar
  19. Fuller TC, McClintock E (1986) Poisonous Plants of California. California Natural History Guides, 53. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene E (1989) A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science 243:643–646Google Scholar
  21. Groeters FR (1989) Geographic and clonal variation in the milkweed-oleander aphid,Aphis nerii (Homoptera: Aphididae), for winged morph production, life history, and morphology in relation to host plant permanence. Evol Ecol 3:327–341Google Scholar
  22. Hall GD, Langenheim JH (1986) Within-tree spatial variation in the leaf monoterpenes ofSequoia sempervirens. Biochem Syst Ecol 14:625–632Google Scholar
  23. Hall RW, Ehler LE (1980) Population ecology ofAphis nerii on oleander. Environ Entomol 9:338–344Google Scholar
  24. Hawkins BA, Browning HW, Smith Jr. JW (1987) Field evaluation ofAllorhogas pyralophagus imported into Texas for biological control of the stalkborer,Eoreuma loftini, in sugar cane. Entomophaga 32:483–491Google Scholar
  25. Hinton HE (1951) Myrmecophilous Lycaenidae and other Lepidoptera—a summary. Proc Trans South Lond Entomol Nat Hist Soc (1949–50), pp 111–175Google Scholar
  26. Holldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Hua LZ, Lammers F, van Lenteren JC, Huisman PWT, van Vianen A, de Ponti OMB (1987) The parasite-host relationship betweenEncarsia formosa Gahan andTrialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood): XXV. Influence of leaf structure on the searching activity ofEncarsia formosa. J Appl Entomol 104:297–304Google Scholar
  28. Ismail II, Swailem SM (1971) Seasonal occurrence ofAphis nerii Boyer in Giza region (Egypt). Bull Soc Entomol Egypte 55:231–238Google Scholar
  29. Janzen DH (1978) Cicada (Diceroprocta apache (Davis)) mortality by feeding onNerium oleander. Pan-Pac Entomol 54:69–70Google Scholar
  30. Klingauf FA (1987) Feeding, adaptation, and excretion. In: Minks AK, Harrewijn P (eds) Aphids: their Biology, Natural Enemies, and Control. vol. A. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 225–253Google Scholar
  31. Krombein KV (1951) Wasp visitors of tulip-tree honeydew at Dunn-Loring, Virginia. Ann Ent Soc Am 41:141–143Google Scholar
  32. Lawton JH, McNeill S (1979) Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problem of being a herbivore. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR (eds) Populations Dynamics. Blackwell, Oxford. pp 223–244Google Scholar
  33. Malcolm SB (1986) Aposematism in a soft-bodied insect: a case for kin selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malcolm SB (1990) Chemical defence in chewing and sucking insect herbivores: plant-derived cardenolides in the monarch butterfly and oleander aphid. Chemoecol 1:12–21Google Scholar
  35. Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McLain DK, Shure DJ (1985) Host plant toxins and unpalatability ofNeacoryphus bicrucis. Ecol Entomol 10:291–298Google Scholar
  37. McNeil JN, Delisle J, Finnegan RJ (1977) Inventory of aphids on seven conifer species in association with the introduced red wood antFormica lugubris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Can Entomol 109:1199–1202Google Scholar
  38. Molyneux RJ, Campbell BC, Dreyer DL (1990) Honeydew analysis for detecting phloem transport of plant natural products. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1899–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nixon GEJ (1951) The Association of Ants with Aphids and Coccids. Commonwealth Instit Entomol Lond. 36 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Nordlund DA, Chalfant RB, Lewis WJ (1985) Response ofTrichogramma pretiosum females to volatile synomones from tomato plants. J Ent Sci 20:372–376Google Scholar
  41. Pierce NE, Elgar MA (1985) The influence of ants on host plant selection byJalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothschild M, von Euw J, Reichstein T (1970) Cardiac glycosides in the oleander aphidAphis nerii. J Insect Physiol 16:1191–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Smiley JT, Horn JM, Rank NE (1985) Ecological effects of salicin at three trophic levels: new problems from old adaptations. Science 229:649–651Google Scholar
  46. Smith HS, Armitage HM (1931) The biological control of mealybugs attacking citrus. Calif Agric Exp Station Bull 509:1–74Google Scholar
  47. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company. San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  48. Sudd JH (1983) The distribution of foraging wood-ants (Formica lugubris Zett.) in relation to the distribution of aphids. Insectes Sociaux, Paris 30:298–307Google Scholar
  49. Thorpe KW, Barbosa P (1986) Effect of consumption of high and low nicotine tobacco byManduca sexta on survival of the gregarious endoparasitoidCotesia congregata. J Chem Ecolo 12:1329–1337Google Scholar
  50. Way WJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 8:307–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward PS (1987) Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55:1–16Google Scholar
  52. Yamauchi T, Abe T, Tachibana Y, Atal CK, Sharma BM, Imre Z (1983) Quantitative variations in the cardiac glycosides of oleander. Phytochemistry 22:2211–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zoebelein G (1956a) Der Honigtau als Nahrung der Insekten. Teil I. Z. Ang Entomol 38:369–416Google Scholar
  54. Zoebelein G (1956b) Der Honigtau als Nahrung der Insekten. Teil II. Z Ang Entomol 39:129–167Google Scholar
  55. Zoebelein G (1957) Die Rolle des Waldhonigtaus im Nahrungshaushalt forstlich nutzlicher Insekten. Forstwissenschafliches Zentralblatt 76:24–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Bristow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department or EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations