Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 275, Issue 3, pp 451–458 | Cite as

Molecular structure and functional morphology of echinoderm collagen fibrils

  • John A. Trotter
  • Frederick A. Thurmond
  • Thomas J. Koob


The collagenous tissues of echinoderms, which have the unique capacity to rapidly and reversibly alter their mechanical properties, resemble the collagenous tissues of other phyla in consisting of collagen fibrils in a nonfibrillar matrix. Knowledge of the composition and structure of their collagen fibrils and interfibrillar matrix is thus important for an understanding of the physiology of these tissues. In this report it is shown that the collagen molecules from the fibrils of the spine ligament of a seaurchin and the deep dermis of a sea-cucumber are the same length as those from vertebrate fibrils and that they assemble into fibrils with the same repeat period and gap/overlap ratio as do those of vertebrate fibrils. The distributions of charged residues in echinoderm and vertebrate molecules are somewhat different, giving rise to segment-long-spacing crystallites and fibrils with different banding patterns. Compared to the vertebrate pattern, the banding pattern of echinoderm fibrils is characterized by greatly increased stain intensity in the c3 band and greatly reduced stain intensity in the a3 and b2 bands. The fibrils are spindle-shaped, possessing no constant-diameter region throughout their length. The shape of the fibrils is mechanically advantageous for their reinforcing role in a discontinuous fiber-composite material.

Key words

Collagen Fibril Segment-long-spacing crystallite Eucidaris tribuloides Cucumaria frondosa (Echinodermata) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashhurst DE, Bailey AJ (1980) Locust collagen: morphological and biochemical characterization. Eur J Biochem 103:75–83Google Scholar
  2. Baccetti B (1967) High resolutions on collagen of Echinodermata. Monit Zool Ital 1:201–206Google Scholar
  3. Bailey AJ (1985) The collagen of the Echinodermata. In: Bairati A, Garrone R (eds) Biology of invertebrate and lower vertebrate collagens. Plenum Press, New York, pp 369–388Google Scholar
  4. Bailey AJ, Gathercole LJ, Dlugosz J, Keller A, Voyle CA (1982) Proposed resolution of the paradox of extensive crosslinking and low tensile strength of cuvierian tubule collagen from the sea-cucumber Holothuria forskali. Int J Biol Macromol 4:329–334Google Scholar
  5. Birk DE, Zycband EI, Winkelmann DA, Trelstad RL (1989) Collagen fibrillogenesis in situ: fibril segments are intermediates in matrix asscmbly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:4549–4553Google Scholar
  6. Bruns RR, Gross J (1973) Band pattern of the segment-long-spacing form of collagen. Its use in the analysis of primary structure. Biochemistry 12:808–815Google Scholar
  7. Byrne M (1985) The mechanical properties of the autotomy tissues of the holothurian Eupentacta quinquesemita and the effects of certain physico-chemical agents. J Exp Biol 117:69–86Google Scholar
  8. Carrara AS, McGarry FJ (1968) Matrix and interface stresses in a discontinuous fiber composite material. J Composite Materials 2:222–243Google Scholar
  9. Chapman JA, (1985) The banding pattern of collagen. In: Bairati A, Garrone R (eds) Biology of invertebrate and lower vertebrate collagens. Plenum Press, New York, pp 515–537Google Scholar
  10. Diab M, Gilly WF (1984) Mechanical properties and control of non-muscular catch in spine ligaments of the sea-urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. J Exp Biol 111:155–170Google Scholar
  11. Dietrich HF, Fontaine AR (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissues. Stain Technol 50:351–354Google Scholar
  12. Exposito J-Y, D'Alessio M, Ramirez F (1992a) Novel amino-terminal propeptide configuration in a fibrillar procollagen undergoing alternative splicing. J Biol Chem 267:1704–1708Google Scholar
  13. Exposito J, D'Alessio M, Solursh M, Ramirez F (1992b) Sea-urchin collagen evolutionarily homologous to vertebrate pro-alpha2(I) collagen. J Biol Chem 267:15559–15562Google Scholar
  14. Francois J, Herbage D, Junqua S (1980) Cockroach collagen: isolation, biochemical and biophysical characterization. Eur J Biochem 112:389–396Google Scholar
  15. Hidaka M, Takahashi K (1983) Fine structure and mechanical properties of the catch apparatus of the sea-urchin spine, a collagenous connective tissue with muscle-like holding capacity. J Exp Biol 103:1–14Google Scholar
  16. Holmes DF, Chapman JA, Prockop DJ, Kadler KE (1992) Growing tips of type I collagen fibrils formed in vitro are nearparaboidal in shape, implying a reciprocal relationship between accretion and diameter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9855–9859Google Scholar
  17. Hukins DWL, Aspden RM, Yarker YE (1984) Fibre reinforcement and mechanical stability in articular cartilage. Eng Med 13:153–156Google Scholar
  18. Hyman LH (1955) The invertebrates, vol 4 Echinodermata. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 121–138Google Scholar
  19. Jeronimidis G, Vincent JFV (1984) Composite materials. In: Hukins DWL (ed) Connective tissue matrix. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 187–210Google Scholar
  20. Kadler KE, Hojima Y, Prockop DJ (1990) Collagen fibrils in vitro grow from pointed tips in the C-to N-terminal direction. Biochem J 268:339–343Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn K (1982) Segment-long-spacing crystallites, a powerful tool in collagen research. Collagen Rel Res 2:61–80Google Scholar
  22. Marks MH, Bear RS, Blake CH (1949) X-ray diffraction evidence of collagen-type protein fibers in the Echinodermata, Coelenterata and Porifera. J Exp Zool 111:55–78Google Scholar
  23. Matsumura T (1973) Shape, size and amino acid composition of collagen fibril of the starfish Asterias amurensis. Comp Biochem Physiol 44B:1197–1205Google Scholar
  24. Matsumura T (1974) Collagen fibrils of the sea-cucumber, Stichopus japonicus: purification and morphological study. Connect Tissue Res 2:117–125Google Scholar
  25. Miller EJ, Rhodes RK (1982) Preparation and characterization of the different types of collagen. Methods Enzymol 82:33–64Google Scholar
  26. Morales M, del Castillo J, Smith DS (1989) Acetylcholine sensitivity of the spine-test articular capsule of the sea-urchin Eucidaris Tribuloides. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 94:547–554Google Scholar
  27. Motokawa T (1982) Fine structure of the dermis of the body wall of the sea-cucumber Stichopus chloronotus. a connective tissue which changes its mechanical properties. Galaxea 1:55–64Google Scholar
  28. Motokawa T (1984a) Connective tissue catch in echinoderms. Biol Rev 59:255–270Google Scholar
  29. Motokawa T (1984b) Viscoelasticity of holothurian body wall. J Exp Biol 109:63–75Google Scholar
  30. Nordwig A, Hayduk U (1969) Invertebrate collagens: isolation, characterization and phylogenetic aspects. J Mol Biol 44:161–172Google Scholar
  31. O'Neill P (1989) Structure and mechanics of starfish body wall. J Exp Biol 147:53–89Google Scholar
  32. Parry DAD, Craig AS (1984) Growth and development of collagen fibrills in connective tissue. In: Ruggeri A, Motta PM (eds) Ultrastructure of the connective tissue matrix. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 34–64Google Scholar
  33. Piez KA, Gross J (1959) The amino acid composition and morphology of some invertebrate and vertebrate collagens. Biochim Biophys Acta 34:24–39Google Scholar
  34. Piggott MR (1980) Load bearing fiber composites. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Pucci-Minafra I, Galante R, Minafra S (1978) Identification of collagen in the Aristotle's lanternae of Paracentrotus lividus. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 10:53–63Google Scholar
  36. Shadwick RE, Pollock C (1988) Dynamic mechanical properties of sea-urchin spine ligaments. In: Burke RD, Mladenov PV, Lambert P, Parsley RL (eds) Echinoderm biology Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 635–640Google Scholar
  37. Shimizu K, Amemiya S, Yoshizato K (1990) Biochemical and immunological characterization of collagen molecules from echinothurioid sea-urchin Asthenosoma ijimai. Biochim Biophys Acta 1038:39–46Google Scholar
  38. Silver S, Miller J, Harrison R, Prockop DJ (1992) Helical model of nucleation and propogation to account for the growth of type I collagen fibrils from symmetrical pointed tips: a special example of self-assembly of rod-like monomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9860–9864Google Scholar
  39. Smith DS, Wainwright SA, Baker J, Cayer ML (1981) Structural features associated with movement and ‘catch’ of sea-urchin spines. Tissue Cell 13:299–320Google Scholar
  40. Smith DS, del Castillo J, Morales M, Luke B (1990) The attachment of collagenous ligament to stereom in primary spines of the sea-urchin, Eucidaris tribuloides. Tissue Cell 22:157–176Google Scholar
  41. Takahashi K (1967) The catch apparatus of the sea-urchin spine. II. Responses to stimuli. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo, Sec IV 11:121–130Google Scholar
  42. Trotter JA, Koob TJ (1989) Collagen and proteoglycan in a seaurchin ligament with mutable mechanical properties. Cell Tissue Res 258:527–539Google Scholar
  43. Trotter JA, Purslow PP (1992) Functional morphology of the endomysium in series fibered muscles. J Morphol 212:109–122Google Scholar
  44. Trotter JA, Wofsy C (1989) The length of collagen fibrils in tendon. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14:180Google Scholar
  45. Wilkie IC (1984) Variable tensility in echinoderm collagenous tissues: a review. Mar Behav Physiol 11:1–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Trotter
    • 1
  • Frederick A. Thurmond
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Koob
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversity of New Mexico School of MedicineAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Shriners Hospital for Crippled ChildrenTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations