Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 26–32 | Cite as

Snail populations in arctic lakes: competition mediated by predation?

  • Anne E. Hershey
Original Papers

Summary

For 2 species of snails in arctic Alaskan lakes, I studied the patterns of snail distribution with respect to habitat, distribution of predatory fish, and the potential for interspecific competition. The snails Lymnaea elodes and Valvata lewisi co-exist in these arctic lakes, either in the presence of lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush, or in the absence of predation. Intensive sediment core sampling of Toolik Lake and Lake N-2, with trout and lacking trout, respectively, showed that the smaller snail, Valvata, was abundant in Toolik but ocurred at very low densities in Lake N-2. On the open sediments of lakes containing trout, diver surveys revealed very low densities of adult Lymnaea (0.12±0.12/m2), but similar surveys in lakes without trout revealed much higher densities of adult Lymnaea (7.1±1.8/m2). A survey of 14 lakes indicated that adult Lymnaea grew to a smaller mean size in lakes with trout than in lakes which lacked trout.

In laboratory and field experiments, the presence of Lymnaea lowered the fecundity of Valvata. Laboratory experiments also showed that Lymnaea fecundity was enhanced by the presence of Valvata. Enhancement was not due to predation by Lymnaea on Valvata eggs or young. The observed patterns of distribution and abundance in the absence of trout, combined with results from laboratory experiments, are consistent with the hypothesis that competitive and facilitative interactions control the population dynamics of the two snails. The distribution and abundance patterns of snails where trout are present suggest that trout predation rather than competition controls snail population dynamics in lakes containing trout.

Key words

Competition Facilitation Lake trout Predation Snails 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bendock T, Burr J (1981) Index to North Slope streams and lakes survey. Alaska Fish and Game ReportGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown KM (1982) Resource overlap and competition in pond snails: an experimental analysis. Ecology 63:412–422Google Scholar
  3. Brown KM, DeVries DR (1985) Predation and the distribution of a pulmonate pond snail. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:93–99Google Scholar
  4. Calow P (1979) Why some metazoan mucus secretions are more susceptible to microbial attack than others. Am Nat 114:149–152Google Scholar
  5. Connor VM, Quinn JF (1984) Stimulation of food species growth by limpet mucus. Science 225:843–844Google Scholar
  6. Cuker BE (1983) Competition and coexistence among the grazing snail, Lymnaea, Chironomidae, and microcrustacea in an arctic epilithic lacustrine community. Ecology 64:10–15Google Scholar
  7. Eisenberg RM (1966) The role of food in the regulation of the pond snail, Lymnaea elodes. Ecology 47:889–906Google Scholar
  8. Hairston NG, FE Smith, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425Google Scholar
  9. Hershey AE (1983) Benthic community structure in an arctic lake: fish predation, foraging strategies, and prey refugia. Ph.D. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar
  10. Hershey AE (1985a) Experimental effects of predatory sculpin on the chironomid communities of two arctic littoral zone habitats. Ecology 66:1131–1138Google Scholar
  11. Hershey AE (1985b) Littoral chironomid communities in an arctic Alaskan lake. Holarctic Ecol 8:39–48Google Scholar
  12. Hershey AE, McDonald ME (1985) Diet and digestion rates of the slimy sculpin, Cottus cognatus, in an Alaskan arctic lake. Can J Fish Aq Sci 42:483–487Google Scholar
  13. Johnson L (1972) Keller Lake: characteristics of a culturally unstressed salmonid community. J Fish Res Board Can 29:731–740Google Scholar
  14. Lodge DM (1985) Macrophyte gastropod associations: observations and experiments on macrophyte choice by gastropods. Freshwater Biol 15:695–708Google Scholar
  15. Macan TT (1966) Predation by Salmo trutta in a moorland fishpond. Verh Int Verein Limnol 16:1081–1087Google Scholar
  16. McDonald ME, Cuker BE, Mozley SC (1982) Distribution, production, and age structure of slimy sculpin in an arctic lake. Environ Biol Fishes 7:171–176Google Scholar
  17. Miller MC, Hater GR, Spatt P, Westlake P, Yeakel D (1986) Primary production and its control in Toolik Lake, Alaska. Arch Hydrobiol [Suppl] 74:97–131Google Scholar
  18. Nilsson NA (1972) Effects of introductions of salmonids into barren lakes. J Fish Res Board Can 29:693–697Google Scholar
  19. O'Brien WJ, Buchanan C, Haney J (1979) Arctic zooplankton community structure: exceptions to some general rules. Arctic 32:237–247Google Scholar
  20. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285Google Scholar
  21. Slobodkin LB, Smith FE, Hairston NG (1967) Regulation in terrestrial ecosystems, and the implied balance of nature. Am Nat 101:109–124Google Scholar
  22. Smith SH (1972) Factors in ecological succession in oligotrophic fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Fish Res Board Can 29:717–730Google Scholar
  23. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman and, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas JD (1982) Chemical ecology of the snail hosts of schistosomiasis: snail-snail and snail-plant interactions. Malacologia 22:81–91Google Scholar
  25. Tippets WE, Moyle PB (1978) Epibenthic feeding by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in the McCloud River, California. J Anim Ecol 47:549–559Google Scholar
  26. Underwood AJ (1978) An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:185–202Google Scholar
  27. Underwood AJ (1984) Vertical and seasonal patterns in competition for microalgae between intertidal gastropods. Oecologia (Berlin) 64:221–222Google Scholar
  28. Ware DM (1972) Risk of epibenthic prey to predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J Fish Res Board Can 30:787–797Google Scholar
  29. Ware DM (1973) Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density, and prey size. J Fish Res Board Can 29:1193–1201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne E. Hershey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations