Oecologia

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Gut architecture, digestive constraints and feeding ecology of deposit-feeding and carnivorous polychaetes

  • Deborah L. Penry
  • Peter A. Jumars
Original Papers
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Summary

We analyze gut architectures of 42 species of marine polychaetes in terms of their anatomically distinct compartments, and quantify differences among guts in terms of ratios of body volume to gut volume, relative compartmental volumes, total gut aspect ratios and compartmental aspect ratios. We use multivariate techniques to classify these polychaetes into 4 groups: carnivores with tubular guts; deposit feeders with tubular guts; deposit feeders with 3 gut compartments; and deposit feeders with 4 or 5 gut compartments. Tubular guts, morphological expressions of plug flow, are common among deposit feeders and may allow relatively rapid ingestion rates and short throughput times. Median gut volume per unit of body volume in deposit feeders (31%) is twice that of carnivores (15%) and ranges up to 83% in one deep-sea species. Deep-sea deposit feeders tend to have relatively larger and longer guts than closely-related nearshore and shelf species. Guts of a number of deep-sea deposit feeders and nearshore and shelf deposit feeders from muddy environments are relatively longer and narrower as body size increases, suggesting that digestive diffusion limitations may be important. Gut volume scales as (body volume)1 while ingestion rate scales as (body volume)0.7. If diet and the chemical kinetics of digestion do not change appreciably, throughput time and thus the extent of digestion of given dietary components therefore must increase as a deposit feeder grows. Digestive processing constrainst may be most important in juveniles of species (especially those species with plug-flow guts) that are deposit feeders as adults.

Key words

Digestion Gut morphology Polychaetes Deposit feeders Carnivores 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen JA, Sanders HL (1966) Adaptations to abyssal life as shown by the bivalve Abra profundorum (Smith). Deep-Sea Res 13:1175–1184Google Scholar
  2. Al-Joborae FF (1980) The influence of diet on the gut morphology of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris L. 1758). Ph.D. thesis, university of Oxford, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Calder WA III (1984) Size, function, and life history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Cammen LM (1980) Ingestion rate: An empirical model for aquatic deposit feeders and detritivores. Oecologia 44:303–310Google Scholar
  5. Carney RS (1989) Examining relationships between organic carbon flux and deep-sea deposit feeding. In: Lopez G, Taghon GL, Levinton JS (eds) Ecology of marine deposit feeders. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 24–58Google Scholar
  6. Dade WB, Jumars PA, Penry DL (1990) Supply-side optimization: maximizing absorptive rates. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Dales RP (1955) Feeding and digestion in terebellid polychaetes. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 34:55–79Google Scholar
  8. DeFlaun MF, Mayer LM (1983) Relationships between bacteria and grain surfaces in intertidal sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 28:873–881Google Scholar
  9. Fauchald K, Jumars PA (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 17:193–284Google Scholar
  10. Fisher RA (1970) Statistical methods for research workers. Hafner Publishing, Darien, CTGoogle Scholar
  11. Forbes TL (1989) The importance of size-dependent processes in the ecology of deposit-feeding benthos. In: Lopez G, Taghon GL, Levinton JS (eds) Ecology of marine deposit feeders. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 171–200Google Scholar
  12. Forbes TL, Lopez GR (1987) The allometry of deposit feeding in Capitella species I (Polychaeta: Capitellidae): the role of temperature and pellet weight in the control of egestion. Biol Bull 172:187–201Google Scholar
  13. Gallagher ED, Gardner GB, Jumars PA (1990) Competition among the pioneers in a seasonal soft-bottom benthic succession: field experiments and analysis of the Gilpin-Ayala competition model. Oecologia (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Gooday AJ (1988) A response by benthic Foraminifera to the deposition of phytodetritus in the deep sea. Nature 332:70–73Google Scholar
  15. Grassle JF, Grassle JP (1974) Opportunistic life-histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. J Mar Res 32:253–284Google Scholar
  16. Hoppe PP (1977) Rumen fermentation and body weight in African ruminants. In: Proceedings of XIIIth Congress of Game Biologists. Atlanta, GA, pp 141–150Google Scholar
  17. Hume ID (1982) Digestive physiology and nutrition of marsupials. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jumars PA (1974) Dispersion patterns and species diversity of macrobenthos in two bathyal communities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Jumars PA (1975) Target species for deep-sea studies in ecology, genetics and physiology. Zool J Linn Soc 57:341–348Google Scholar
  20. Jumars PA, Penry DL (1989) Digestion theory applied to deposit feeding. In: Lopez G, Taghon GL, Levinton JS (eds) Ecology of marine deposit feeders. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 114–128Google Scholar
  21. Jumars PA, Altenbach AV, De Lange GJ, Emerson SR, Hargrave BT, Muller PJ, Prahl FG, Reimers CE, Steiger T, Suess E (1989) Transformation of seafloor-arriving fluxes into the sedimentary record. In: Berger WH, Smetacek VS, Wefer G (eds) Productivity of the ocean: present and past. Dahlem Konferenzen, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp 291–301Google Scholar
  22. Khripounoff A, Sibuet M (1980) La nutrition d'echinoderms abyssaux I. Alimentation des holothuries. Mar Biol 60:17–26Google Scholar
  23. Levin LA, Caswell H, DePatra KD, Creed EL (1987) Demographic consequences of larval development mode: planktotrophy vs lecithotrophy in Streblospio benedicti. Ecology 68:1877–1886Google Scholar
  24. Lochte K, Turley TM (1988) Bacteria and cyanobacteria associated with phytodetritus in the deep sea. Nature 333:67–69Google Scholar
  25. Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1975) Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Parra R (1978) Comparison of foregut and hindgut fermentation in herbivores. In: Montogmery GG (ed) The ecology of arboreal folivores. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, pp 205–229Google Scholar
  27. Pearson TH, Rosenberg R (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 16:229–311Google Scholar
  28. Penry DL (1988) Digestion theory and applications to deposit feeders. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  29. Penry DL (1989) Tests of kinematic models for deposit feeders' guts: patterns of sediment processing by Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson) (Holothuroidea) and Amphicteis scaphobranchiata Moore (Polychaeta). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 128:127–146Google Scholar
  30. Penry DL, Jumars PA (1986) Chemical reactor analysis and optimal digestion theory. BioScience 36:310–315Google Scholar
  31. Penry DL, Jumars PA (1987) Modeling animal guts as chemical reactors. Am Nat 129:69–96Google Scholar
  32. Plante CJ, Jumars PA, Baross JA (1989) Rapid bacterial growth in the hindgut of a marine deposit feeder. Microb Ecol 18:29–44Google Scholar
  33. Pough FH (1973) Lizard energetics and diet. Ecology 54:837–844Google Scholar
  34. Savory CJ, Gentle MJ (1976) Changes in food intake and gut size in Japanese quail in response to manipulation of dietary fiber content. Br Poult Sci 17:571–580Google Scholar
  35. Self RFL, Jumars PA (1978) New resource axes for deposit feeders? J Mar Res 36:627–641Google Scholar
  36. Self RFL, Jumars PA (1988) Cross-phyletic patterns of particle selection by deposit feeders. J Mar Res 46:119–143Google Scholar
  37. Sibly RM (1981) Strategies of digestion and defecation. In: Townsend CR, Calow P (eds) Physiological ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 109–139Google Scholar
  38. Smith CR (1986) Nekton falls, low-intensity disturbance and community structure of infaunal benthos in the deep sea. J Mar Res 44:567–600Google Scholar
  39. Smith KL Jr., Baldwin JR (1984) Seasonal fluctuations in deep-sea community oxygen consumption: central and eastern North Pacific. Nature 307:624–626Google Scholar
  40. Thistle D, Eckman JE (in press) The effect of a biologically produced structure on the benthic copepods of a deep-sea site. Deep-Sea ResGoogle Scholar
  41. Troyer K (1984) Diet selection and digestion in Iguana iguana: the importance of age and nutrient requirements. Oecologia 61:201–207Google Scholar
  42. Weston DP (1983) Distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates on the North Carolina continental shelf with consideration of sediment, hydrography and biogeography. Ph.D. dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  43. Weston DP (1988) Macrobenthos-sediment relationships on the continental shelf off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Continental Shelf Res 8:267–286Google Scholar
  44. Wishart D (1975) Clustan, release 1 c. University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Woodin SA (1974) Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecol Monogr 44:171–187Google Scholar
  46. Yamamoto N, Lopez G (1985) Bacterial abundance in relation to surface area and organic content of marine sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 90:209–220Google Scholar
  47. ZoBell CE (1983) Studies on the bacterial flora of marine bottom sediments. J Sed Pet 8:10–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah L. Penry
    • 1
  • Peter A. Jumars
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Oceanography WB-10University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations