Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 265–271 | Cite as

Effects of light quality and quantity on growth of the clonal plant Eichhornia crassipes

  • M. Méthy
  • P. Alpert
  • J. Roy
Original Papers

Summary

Plant canopy shade reduces photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and ratio of red to far-red light (z). Both effects can cause plants to increase potential for light acquisition through vertical growth and leaf area expansion. Clonal plants such as Eichhornia crassipes might alternatively increase light interception via horizontal growth of stolons or rhizomes and placement of new ramets in less shaded microsites. Effect of simulated canopy shade and component effects of PPFD and z were tested by filtering or adding light uniformly, to a whole group of connected ramets, or locally, to individual ramets within a group. In uniform treatments, low PPFD reduced total growth but low z did not. Low PPFD and low z independently reduced stolon and ramet production and caused etiolation of petioles; effect of low PPFD plus low z on ramet production was greater than that of either factor alone. Lateral clonal growth thus did not seem to be a response to uniform shading; instead, uniformly low PPFD or low z increased partitioning to established ramets. Low z changed partitioning without changing total growth. In local treatments, reduction of growth of individual ramets due to low PPFD and inhibition of new ramet production attributable to spectral composition of light were mitigated when connected ramets were unshaded; plants may respond differently to patchy than to uniform shade.

Key words

Clonal growth Eichhornia crassipes Partitioning Photon flux density Red: far-red 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballaré CL, Sanchez RA, Scopel A. L., Casal JJ, Ghersa CM (1987) Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight. Plant Cell Env 10:551–557Google Scholar
  2. Casal JJ, Sanchez RR, Deregibus VA (1986) The effect of plant density on tillering: the involvement of R/FR ratio and the proportion of radiation intercepted per plant. Env Exp Bot 26:365–371Google Scholar
  3. Deregibus VA, Sanchez RA, Casal JJ, Trlica MJ (1985) Tillering responses to enrichment of red light beneath the canopy in a humid natural grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:199–206Google Scholar
  4. Gopal B (1987) Water hyacinth. Elsevier Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Holmes MG, Smith H (1977a) The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. I. Characterisation of daylight for studies in photomorphogenesis and photoperiodism. Photochem Photobiol 25:533–538Google Scholar
  6. Holmes MG, Smith H (1977b) The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. II. The influence of vegetation canopies on the spectral energy distribution of natural daylight. Photochem Photobiol 25:539–545Google Scholar
  7. Lee DW (1985) Duplicating foliage shade for research on plant development. Hort Science 20:116–118Google Scholar
  8. Lovett Doust L (1987) Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ramunculus repens). III. Responses to light and nutrient supply. J Ecol 75:555–568Google Scholar
  9. Méthy M, Fabreguettes J, Jardon F, Roy J (1987) Design of a simple instrument for the measurement of red/far red ratios. Oecol Plant 8:281–290Google Scholar
  10. Pitelka LF, Ashmun JW (1985) Physiology and integration of ramets in clonal plants. In: Jackson J, Buss LC, Cook RE (eds) The population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp 399–435Google Scholar
  11. Richards JH (1982) Development potential of axillary buds of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes Solms. (Pontederiaceae). Amer J Bot 69:615–622Google Scholar
  12. Richards JH, Lee DW (1986) Light effects on leaf morphology in water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Amer J Bot 73:1741–1747Google Scholar
  13. Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987) The effects of light intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:639–650Google Scholar
  14. Smith H (1982) Light quality, photoreception and plant strategy. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 33:481–518Google Scholar
  15. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, Second Edition. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Solangaarachchi SM, Harper JL (1987) The effect of canopy filtered light on the growth of white clover Trifloium repens. Oecologia 72:372–376Google Scholar
  17. Sutherland WJ, Stillman RA (1988) The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos 52:239–244Google Scholar
  18. Watson MA, Carrier JC, Cook GS (1982) Effect of exogenously supplied gibberelic acid (GA3) on pattern of water hyacinth development. Aquatic Bot 13:57–68Google Scholar
  19. Willemoës JG, Beltrano J, Montaldi ER (1987) Stolon differentiation in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. mediated by phytochrome. Env Exp Bot 27:15–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Méthy
    • 1
  • P. Alpert
    • 1
  • J. Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.C. N. R. S.-CEPEMontpellier CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations