, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 191–196 | Cite as

Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae)

  • Björn Widén
  • Marie Widén
Original Papers


Pollen movement is often restricted in natural populations, and insufficient pollination is a potential constraint on sexual reproduction in outcrossing species. Seed-set should decrease with increased distance from the pollen source in outcrossing plants. This prediction was tested using females of the clonal, gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea in three natural populations. In controlled pollinations, both hermaphrodites and females had similar high percentages of fruit-set and seed-set. In a natural population where a female clone was isolated from the nearest hermaphroditic clone by c. 100 m, fruit-set was low (1%). In another population where hemaphroditic clones were rare and female clones had a patchy distribution, fruit-and seed-set in females were pollen-limited and decreased with increased distance from the nearest pollen source. The estimated mean pollen dispersal distance was 5.9 m when calculated on fruit-set and 5.3 m when calculated on seed-set. The most frequent pollinators were bumblebees. The mean and median distances moved by pollinators between ramets were 0.13 m and 0.05 m. In a third population where female clones were isolated from the nearest hermaphrodites by more than 200 m, fruit-set was 0%. After introduction of 16 hermaphroditic ramets in the center of the female clone, fruit-set varied between 0% and 100% in individual female ramets. Fruit-set decreased with increased distance from the pollen source. The mean and median pollen movement distances were 1.06 m and 0.54 m.

Key words

Glechoma Clonal plant Gynodioecy Pollen flow 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson S (1988) Size-dependent pollination efficiency in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae): causes and consequences. Oecologia 76:125–130Google Scholar
  2. Arroyo MTK (1976) Geitonogamy in animal pollinated tropical angiosperms. A stimulus for the evolution of self-incompatibility. Taxon 25:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett CH, Thomson JD (1982) Spatial pattern, floral sex ratios, and fecundity in dioecious Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Can J Bot 60:1662–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman AJ (1956) Cryptic self-incompatibility in the Wallflower: Cheiranthus cheiri L. Heredity 10:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bawa KS (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter FL (1976) Plant-pollinator interactions in Hawaii: Pollination energetics in Metrosideros collina (Myrtaceae). Ecology 57:1125–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Amer Nat 112:975–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1969) Differentiation of populations. Science 165:1228–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1985) Interpopulation gene flow by pollen in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am Nat 126:606–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gill LS (1979) Cyto-taxonomic studies of the tribe Nepeteae (Labiatae) in Canada. Genetica 50:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Godley EJ (1979) Flower biology in New Zealand. New Zealand J Bot 17:441–466Google Scholar
  12. Gouyon P-H, Couvet D (1987) A conflict between two sexes, females and hermaphrodites. In Sterns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 245–261Google Scholar
  13. Govindaraju DR (1988) Relationship between dispersal ability and level of gene flow in plants. Oikos 52:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handel SN (1985) The intrusion of clonal growth patterns on plant breeding systems. Amer Nat 125:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harberd DJ (1967) Observation on natural clones of Holcus mollis. New Phytol 66:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hessing MB (1988) Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. Amer J Bot 75:1324–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hicks DJ, Wyatt R, Meagher TR (1985) Reproductive biology of distylous Partridgeberry, Mitchella repens. Amer J Bot 72:1503–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krohne DT, Baker I, Baker HG (1980) The maintenance of the gynodioecious breeding system in Plantago lanceolata. Am Midl Nat 103:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 68:233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levin DA (1984) Immigration in plants: An exercise in the subjunctive. In: Dirzo R, Surukhan J (eds) Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 242–260Google Scholar
  21. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220Google Scholar
  22. Lewis D (1941) Male-sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants: The equilibrium between females and hermaphrodites to be expected with different types of inheritance. New Phytol 40:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd DG (1974) Theoretical sex ratios of gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32:11–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 128:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menges ES (1987) Biomass allocation and geometry of the clonal forest herb, Laportea canadensis: Adaptive responses or allometric constraints. Am J Bot 74:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rathcke B (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 305–329Google Scholar
  27. Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987) The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1989) Within-and between-population variation in ramet behaviour in the gynodioecious clonal herb, Glechoma hederacea (Labiatae). Can J Bot 67:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Valdeyron G, Dommee B, Valdeyron A (1973) Gynodioecy: Another computer simulation model. Am Nat 107:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Damme JMM, Van Delden W (1984) Gynodioecy in Plantago lanceolata L. IV. Fitness components of sex types in different life cycle stages. Evolution 38:1326–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Willson MF, Miller LJ, Rathcke BJ (1979) Floral display in Phlox and Geranium: Adaptive aspects. Evolution 33:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wyatt R, Hellwig RL (1979) Factors determining fruit-set in heterostylous bluets, Houstonia caerulea (Rubiaceae). Syst Bot 4:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Widén
    • 1
  • Marie Widén
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systematic BotanyUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations