Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 88, Issue 4, pp 521–528 | Cite as

Effects of spines and thorns on Australian arid zone herbivores of different body masses

  • Gary E. Belovsky
  • Oswald J. Schmitz
  • J. B. Slade
  • T. J. Dawson
Original Papers

Summary

We investigated the effects of thorns and spines on the feeding of 5 herbivore species in arid Australia. The herbivores were the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), euro kangaroo (Macropus robustus), red kangaroo (Macropus rufus), sheep (Ovis aries), and cattle (Bos taurus). Five woody plants without spines or thorns and 6 woody plants with thorns were included in the study. The spines and thorns were not found to affect the herbivores' rates of feeding (items ingested/min), but they did reduce the herbivores' rates of biomass ingestion (g-dry/item). The reduction in biomass ingested occurred in two ways: at a given diameter, twigs with spines and thorns had less mass than undefended plants, and the herbivores consumed twigs with smaller diameters on plants with spines and thorns. The relative importance of the two ways that twigs with spines and thorns provided less biomass varied with herbivore body mass. Reduced twig mass was more important for small herbivores, while large herbivores selected smaller diameters. The effectiveness of spines and thorns as anti-herbivore defenses did not vary with the evolutionary history of the herbivores (i.e. native vs. introduced). Spines and thorns mainly affected the herbivores' selection of maximum twig sizes (reducing diameter and mass), but the minimum twig sizes selected were also reduced.

Key words

Herbivory Australia, kangaroos Plantanimal interactions Plant defenses 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belovsky GE (1981) Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecology 62:1020–1030Google Scholar
  2. Belovsky GE (1984a) Snowshoe hare optimal foraging and its implications for population dynamics. Theor Pop Biol 25:235–264Google Scholar
  3. Belovsky GE (1984b) Summer diet optimization by beaver. Am Midl Nat 111:209–222Google Scholar
  4. Belovsky GE (1986) Generalist herbivore foraging and its role in competitive interactions. Am Zool 26:51–69Google Scholar
  5. Belovsky GE, Schmitz OJ (1991) Mammalian herbivore optimal foraging and the role of plant defenses. In Palo RT, Robbins CT (eds) Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  6. Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N (1986) Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores. Oecologia 68:446–455Google Scholar
  7. Croft DB (1981a) Behaviour of red kangaroos, Macropus rufus (Desmarest, 1822), in northwestern New South Wales, Australia. Aust Mammal 4:5–68Google Scholar
  8. Croft DB (1981b) Social behaviour of the euro, Macropus robustus (Gould), in the Australian arid zone. Aust Wildl Res 8:13–49Google Scholar
  9. Dawson TJ, Denny MJS, Russell EM, Ellis B (1975) Water usage and diet preferences of free-ranging kangaroos, sheep and feral goats in the Australian arid zone during summer. J Zool (Lond) 177:1–23Google Scholar
  10. Dunham KM (1980) The feeding behaviour of a tame impala Aepyceros melampus. Afr J Ecol 18:253–257Google Scholar
  11. Guggisberg CAW (1966) S.O.S. Rhino. Andre Deutsch, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hope J (1982) Late Cenozoic vertebrate faunas and the development of aridity in Australia. In Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Arid Australia. Peacock Publications, Frewville, South Australia, pp 85–100Google Scholar
  13. Lindroth RL (1989) Mammalian herbivore-plant interactions. In Abrahamson WD (ed) Plant-Animal Interactions. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 163–206Google Scholar
  14. Myers JH, Bazely D (in press) Thorns, spines, prickles and hairs: are they stimulated by herbivory and do they deter herbivores? In Tallamy D, Raup M (eds) Herbivore Induced Phytochemical Changes in Plants. Wiley Inter-Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Pellew RA (1984) Food consumption and energy budgets of giraffe. J Appl Ecol 21:141–159Google Scholar
  16. Schmitz OJ (1989) Environmental variability and optimal foraging behavior of a generalist herbivore: the white-tailed deer. Ph. D. Diss, Univ Mich, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  17. Terry RA, Tilley JMA (1964) The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. J Brit Grassl Soc 19:363–372Google Scholar
  18. Wilkinson L (1990) SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary E. Belovsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oswald J. Schmitz
    • 2
  • J. B. Slade
    • 2
  • T. J. Dawson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.School of Natural ResourcesThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations