Oecologia

, Volume 91, Issue 3, pp 410–418 | Cite as

Pollination by ants: consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system

  • J. M. Gómez
  • R. Zamora
Original Papers

Summary

We have analysed the importance of worker ants (Proformica longiseta, Formicidae) as pollinators of a mass-flowering woody plant (Hormathophylla spinosa, Cruciferae) in the high-mountain area of the Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). We have quantified the abundance and foraging behavior of P. longiseta in comparison with winged flower visitors. We have also examined, by means of selective exclusion experiments, the role of ants as true pollinators, comparing them with the winged flower visitors. A total of 39 species belonging to 18 families visited the flowers of H. spinosa. All the visitors were winged insects, except P. longiseta, a species which alone made up more than 80% of the total number of insects found on the flowers. All pollinators of H. spinosa had similar foraging patterns, with 98% of total movements made between flowers within the same plant. Ants always made contact with the plant reproductive organs when foraging for nectar, and transferred large numbers of pollen grains. However, pollen exposed to ants for brief periods exhibited reduced percentage of germination. P. longiseta is both the most abundant and spatio-temporally predictable flower visitor of H. spinosa. These characteristics, weighted by their flower visitation rate, make worker ants the pollinator that maintains the strongest mutualistic interaction with H. spinosa. The exclusion experiments show that workers behave as true pollinators, since they contribute to increase the number of viable seeds produced by H. spinosa. The key factor of this interaction is mainly the great density of workers throughout the flowering period. In short, the H. spinosa-P. longiseta mutualistic interaction mainly depends on its high probability of occurrence.

Key words

Ant pollination Exclusion experiments Proformica longiseta Hormathophylla spinosa Highmountain ecology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong JD (1981) Biotic pollination mechanisms in the Australian flora — a review. N Z J Bot 17: 467–508Google Scholar
  2. Arroyo MTK, Primack R, Armesto J (1982) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile: I pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variations. Am J Bot 69: 82–97Google Scholar
  3. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie AJ, Turnbull C, Knox RB, Williams EG (1984) Ant inhibition of pollen function: a possible reason why ant pollination is rare. Am J Bot 71: 421–426Google Scholar
  5. Beattie AJ, Turnbull C, Hough T, Jobson S, Knox RB (1985) The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions: evidence and some evolutionary implications. Am J Bot 72: 606–614Google Scholar
  6. Brantjes NBM (1981) Ant, bee and fly pollination in Epipactis palustris (L) Crantz (Orchidiaceae). Acta Bot Neerl 30: 59–68Google Scholar
  7. Breed MD, Bennett B (1985) Mass recruitment to nectar sources in Paraponera clavata: a field study. Soc Insects 32: 198–207Google Scholar
  8. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50: 859–865Google Scholar
  9. Buckley RC (1982) Ant-plant interactions: a world review. In Buckley RC (ed): Ant-plant interactions in Australia. Junk, The Hague, pp 111–142Google Scholar
  10. Charlesworth D (1989). Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation and genetic load. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 289–292Google Scholar
  11. Collingwood CA (1978) A provisional list of Iberian Formicidae, with a key to the worker caste. Eos Rev Esp Entomol 52: 65–95Google Scholar
  12. Ehrenfeld JD (1979) Pollination of three species of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce, with special references to bees. Am Midl Nat 101: 87–98Google Scholar
  13. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd edn. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Feinsinger P (1983) Coevolution and pollination. In Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M (eds). Coevolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland pp 282–310Google Scholar
  15. Fritz RS, Morse DH (1981) Nectar parasitism of Asclepias syriaca by ants: effect on nectar levels, pollinia insertion, pollinaria removal and pod production. Oecologia 50: 316–319Google Scholar
  16. Galen C (1983) The effects of nectar thieving ants on seed set in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 41: 245–249Google Scholar
  17. Galen C (1989) Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882–890Google Scholar
  18. Gómez JM (1991) Biología de la polinización de Hormathophylla spinosa: análisis cualitativo y cuantitativo de una relación mutualista. Ms Dissertation, Granada Univ, Granada, SpainGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez JM, Zamora R, Tinaut A (1990) Pollination of Ptilotrichum spinosum by ants: quantity component. In Veeresh GK, Mallik B, Viraktamath CA (eds) Social insects and the environment. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, pp 447Google Scholar
  20. Heinrich B (1975) Energetics of pollination. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6: 139–170Google Scholar
  21. Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse assemblage. Oikos 50: 79–90Google Scholar
  22. Herrera CM (1987) Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plantpollinator system. Oecologia 80: 241–248Google Scholar
  23. Herrera CM (1990) Brood size reduction in Lavandula latifolia (Labiatae): a test of alternative hypothesis. Evol Trends Plants 4: 99–105Google Scholar
  24. Herrera CM, Herrera J, Espadaler X (1984) Nectar thievery by ants from southern Spanish insect-pollinated flowers. Soc Insects 31: 142–154Google Scholar
  25. Hickman JC (1974) Pollination by ants: a low-energy system. Science 184: 1290–1292Google Scholar
  26. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) Ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Hull DA, Beattie AJ (1988) Adverse effects on pollen exposed to Atta texana and other North American ants: implications for ant pollination. Oecologia 75: 153–155Google Scholar
  28. Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61: 1251–1253Google Scholar
  29. Janzen DH (1977) Why don't ants visits flowers? Biotropica 9: 252Google Scholar
  30. Mani MS (1990) Fundaments of high altitude biology, 2nd edn. Oxford and IBH, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. McDade LA, Davidar P (1984) Determinants of fruit and seed set in Pavonia dasypetala (Malvaceae). Oecologia 64: 61–67Google Scholar
  32. Peakall R (1989) The unique pollination of Leporella fimbriata (Orchidiaceae): poilination by pseudocopulating male ants (Myrmecia urens, Formicidae). Plant Syst Evol 167: 137–148Google Scholar
  33. Peakall R, Beattie AJ (1989) Pollination of orchid Microtis parviflora R. Br. by flightless worker ants. Funct Ecol 3: 515–522Google Scholar
  34. Peakall R, Beattie AJ (1991) The genetic consequences of worker ant pollination in a selfcompatible, clonal orchid. Evolution 45: 1837–1848Google Scholar
  35. Peakall R, Angus CJ, Beattie AJ (1990) The significance of ant and plant traits for ant pollination in Leporella fimbriata. Oecologia 84: 457–460Google Scholar
  36. Peakall R, Handel SN, Beattie AJ (1991): The evidence for, and importante of, ant pollination. In Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 421–428Google Scholar
  37. Petersen B (1977) Pollination by ants in the alpine tundra of Colorado. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 70: 349–355Google Scholar
  38. Rico-Gray V (1990) The importance of floral and circum-floral nectar to ants inhabiting dry tropical lowlands. Biol J Linn Soc 38: 173–181Google Scholar
  39. Sanderson T, Wright PJ (1989) Inhibition of pollen germination by ant secretions. Actas Coll. Insectes Soc 5: 25–30Google Scholar
  40. Shubart HOR, Anderson AB (1978) Why don't ants visit flowers? A reply to D.H. Janzen. Biotropica 10: 310–311Google Scholar
  41. Spear EE (1983) A direct measure of pollinator effectiveness. Oecologia 57: 196–199Google Scholar
  42. Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptative radiation of reproductive characteristics in Angiosperms: I Pollination mechanisms. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1: 307–326Google Scholar
  43. Sudd JH, Franks NR (1987) The behavioural ecology of ants. Blackie & Son, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  44. Svensson L (1985) An estimate of pollen carryover by ants in a natural population of Scleranthus perennis L. (Caryophyllaceae). Oecologia 66: 373–377Google Scholar
  45. Tinaut A (1979) Estudio de la mirmecofauna de los borreguiles del San Juan (Sierra Nevada, Granada) (Hym. Formicidae). Bol Asoc Esp Entomol 3: 173–183Google Scholar
  46. Tinaut A, (1981) Estudio de los Formícidos de Sierra Nevada. Ph. Dissertation, Granada Univ, Granada, SpainGoogle Scholar
  47. Waddington KD (1983) Foraging behavior of pollinators. In: Rea L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando; pp 213–241Google Scholar
  48. Wilkinson L (1986) SYSTAT: The system for Statistics SYSTAT, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  49. Wyatt R (1981) Ant-pollination of the granite outcrop endemic Diamorpha smallii (Crassulaceae). Am J Bot 68: 1212–1217Google Scholar
  50. Wyatt R, Stoneburner A (1981) Patterns of ant-mediated pollen dispersal in Diamorpha smalli (Crassulaceae). Syst Bot 6: 1–7Google Scholar
  51. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Gómez
    • 1
  • R. Zamora
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. Biología Animal y Ecología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations