Oecologia

, Volume 91, Issue 3, pp 377–384 | Cite as

The quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in macroalgae and submerged angiosperms

  • H. Frost-Christensen
  • K. Sand-Jensen
Original Papers
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

Photon absorption and photosynthesis under conditions of light limitation were determined in six temperate marine macroalgae and eight submerged angiosperms. Photon absorption and photosynthetic efficiency based on incident light increased in proportion to chlorophyll density per area and approached saturation at the highest densities (∼300 mg chlorophyll m−2) encountered. Absorption and photosynthetic efficiency were higher in brown and red algae than in green algae and angiosperms for the same chlorophyll density because of absorption by accessory pigments. Among thin macroalgae and submerged angiosperms chlorophyll variations directly influence light absorption and photosynthesis, whereas terrestrial leaves have chlorophyll in excess and thus there is only a minor influence of pigment variability on light-limited photosynthesis. The quantum efficiency of photosynthesis averaged 0.062±0.019 (±SD) mol O2 mol−1 photons absorbed for macroalgae and, significantly less, 0.049±0.016 mol O2 mol−1 photons for submerged angiosperms. Of the measurements 80% were between 0.037 and 0.079 mol O2 mol−1 photons. The results are lower than values given in the literature for unicellular algae and terrestrial C3 species at around 0.1 mol O2 mol−1 photons, but resemble values for other marine macroalgae and terrestrial C4 species. The reason for these differences remains unknown, but may be sought for in differential operation of cyclic photophosphorylation and photorespiration.

Key words

Quantum efficiency Photosynthetic efficiency Absorption Macroalgae Submerged angiosperms 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barko JW, Hardin DG, Matthews MS (1982) Growth and morphology of freshwater macrophytes in relation to light and temperature. Can J Bot 60: 877–887Google Scholar
  2. Beer S, Israel A, Drechsler Z, Cohen Y (1990) Photosynthesis in Ulva fasciata. V. Evidence for an inorganic carbon concentrating system, and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase CO2 kinetics. Plant Physiol 94: 1542–1546Google Scholar
  3. Bidwell RGS, McLachlan J (1985) Carbon nutrition of seaweeds: photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 86: 15–46Google Scholar
  4. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology I. (Encyclopedia of plant physiology, NS, vol 12A). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 57–107Google Scholar
  5. Björkman O, Demmig B (1987) Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489–504Google Scholar
  6. Björkman O, Demmig B, Andrews TJ (1988) Mangrove photosynthesis: response to high-irradiance stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 43–61Google Scholar
  7. Bowes G (1985) Pathways of CO2 fixation by aquatic organisms. In: Lucas WJ, Berry JA (eds) Inorganic carbon uptake by aquatic photosynthetic organisms. American Society Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Maryland, pp 187–210Google Scholar
  8. Campbell WH, Black CC (1978) The relationship of CO2 assimilation pathways and photorespiration to the physiological quantum requirement of green plant photosynthesis. BioSystems 10: 253–264Google Scholar
  9. Chain RK, Arnon DI (1977) Quantum efficiency of photosynthetic energy conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 3377–3381Google Scholar
  10. Dring MJ, Lüning K (1985) Emerson enhancement effect and quantum yield of photosynthesis for marine macroalgae in simulated underwater light fields. Mar Biol 87: 109–117Google Scholar
  11. Ehleringer J, Björkman O (1977) Quantum yields for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 59: 86–90Google Scholar
  12. Ehleringer J, Pearcy RW (1983) Variation in quantum yield for CO2 uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 73: 555–559Google Scholar
  13. French CS, Rabideau GS (1945) The quantum yield of oxygen production by chloroplasts suspended in solutions containing ferric oxalate. J Gen Physiol 28: 329–342Google Scholar
  14. Furbank RT, Jenkins CLD, Hatch MD (1990) C4 photosynthesis: quantum requirement, C4 acid overcycling and Q-cycle involvement. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 1–7Google Scholar
  15. Gabrielsen EK (1948) Effects of different chlorophyll concentrations on photosynthesis in foliage leaves. Physiol Plant 1: 5–37Google Scholar
  16. Gabrielsen EK (1960) Über Lichtabsorption in Photosynthese-organen. In: Ruhland W (ed) The assimilation of carbon dioxide. (Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol V/2). Springer, Berlin Göttingen Heidelberg, pp 8–26Google Scholar
  17. Gaffron H (1960) Energy storage: Photosynthesis. In: Steward FC (ed) Plant physiology. A treatise, vol I B. Academic Press, New York London, pp 3–277Google Scholar
  18. Geertz-Hansen O (1989) Growth and turnover of sea lettuce (Ulva lactuca L) along a eutrophication gradient in Roskilde Fjord. PhD thesis, University of CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  19. Geider RJ, Osborne BA (1987) Light absorption by a marine diatom: experimental observations and theoretical calculations of the package effect in a small Thalassiosira species. Mar Biol 96: 299–308Google Scholar
  20. Gordon DM, Sand-Jensen K (1990) Effects of O2, pH and DIC on photosynthetic net-O2 evolution by marine macroalgae. Mar Biol 106: 445–451Google Scholar
  21. Jeffrey SW, Humphrey GF (1975) New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 167: 191–194Google Scholar
  22. Kok B (1948) A critical consideration of the quantum yield of Chlorella-photosynthesis. Enzymologia 13: 1–56Google Scholar
  23. Kok B (1960) Efficiency of photosynthesis. In: Ruhland W (ed) The assimilation of carbon dioxide (Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol V/1). Springer, Berlin Göttingen Heidelberg, pp 566–633Google Scholar
  24. Kusk KO (1980) Effects of crude oils and aromatic hydrocarbons on the photosynthesis of three species of Acrosiphonia grown in the laboratory. Bot Mar 23: 587–593Google Scholar
  25. Langdon C (1988) On the causes of interspecific differences in the growth-irradiance relationship for phytoplankton. II. A general review. J Plankton Res 10: 1291–1312Google Scholar
  26. Larkum AWD, Barrett J (1983) Light-harvesting processes in algae. Adv Bot Res 10: 1–219Google Scholar
  27. Lüning K, Dring MJ (1985) Action spectra and spectral quantum yield of photosynthesis in marine macroalgae with thin and thick thalli. Mar Biol 87: 119–129Google Scholar
  28. Madsen TV, Sand-Jensen K (1991) Photosynthetic carbon assimilation in aquatic macrophytes. Aquat Bot 41: 5–40Google Scholar
  29. Monson RK, Littlejohn RO Jr, Williams GJ III (1982) The quantum yield for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 grasses. Photosynth Res 3: 153–159Google Scholar
  30. Moore WE, Duggar BM (1949) Quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in Chlorella. In: Franck J, Loomis WE (eds) Photosynthesis in plants. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 239–250Google Scholar
  31. Nielsen SL, Sand-Jensen K (1989) Regulation of photosynthetic rates of submerged rooted macrophytes. Oecologia 81: 364–368Google Scholar
  32. Ogawa T, Miyano A, Inoue Y (1985) Photosystem-I-driven inorganic carbon transport in the cyanobacterium, Anacystis nidulans. Biochim Biophys Acta 808: 77–84Google Scholar
  33. Osborne BA, Raven JA (1986) Light absorption by plants and its implications for photosynthesis. Biol Rev 61: 1–61Google Scholar
  34. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975: 384–394Google Scholar
  35. Ramus J (1978) Seaweed anatomy and photosynthetic performance: The ecological significance of light guides, heterogeneous absorption and multiple scatter. J Phycol 14: 352–362Google Scholar
  36. Raven JA (1984) Energetics and transport in aquatic plants. Alan R Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Raven JA (1985) The CO2 concentrating mechanism. In: Lucas WJ, Berry JA (eds) Inorganic carbon uptake by aquatic photosynthetic organisms. American Society Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Maryland, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  38. Rieke FF (1949) Quantum efficiencies for photosynthesis and photoreduction in green plants. In: Franck J, Loomis WE (eds) Photosynthesis in plants. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 251–272Google Scholar
  39. Sand-Jensen K (1988) Photosynthetic responses of Ulva lactuca at very low light. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50: 195–201Google Scholar
  40. Sand-Jensen K, Gordon DM (1984) Differential ability of marine and freshwater macrophytes to utilize HCOinf3sup− and CO2. Mar Biol 80: 247–253Google Scholar
  41. Smith RG, Bidwell RGS (1989) Mechanism of photosynthetic carbon dioxide uptake by the red macroalga, Chondrus crispus. Plant Physiol 89: 93–99Google Scholar
  42. Steemann Nielsen E (1975) Marine photosynthesis, with special emphasis on the ecological aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Sültemeyer DF, Klug K, Fock HP (1987) Effect of dissolved inorganic carbon on oxygen evolution and uptake by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii suspensions adapted to ambient and CO2-enriched air. Photosynth Res 12: 25–33Google Scholar
  44. Van der Bijl L, Sand-Jensen K, Hjermind AL (1989) Photosynthesis and canopy structure of a submerged plant, Potamogeton pectinatus, in a Danish lowland stream. J Ecol 77: 947–962Google Scholar
  45. Yuan EL, Evans RW, Daniels F (1955) Energy efficiency of photosynthesis by Chlorella. Biochim Biophys Acta 17: 185–193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Frost-Christensen
    • 1
  • K. Sand-Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Plant PhysiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Freshwater BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenHillerødDenmark

Personalised recommendations