Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 401–406 | Cite as

Carbon/nutrient balance as a predictor of plant defense in Alaskan balsam poplar: Potential importance of metabolite turnover

  • P. B. Reichardt
  • F. S. ChapinIII
  • J. P. Bryant
  • B. R. Mattes
  • T. P. Clausen
Original Papers

Summary

The carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis fails to correctly predict effects of fertilization and shading on concentrations of defensive metabolites in Alaskan balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). Of six metabolites analyzed, only one responded in the predicted fashion to fertilization and one to shading. These results and those of other similar studies suggest that while the carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis may correctly predict the effects of fertilization and shading on the concentrations of metabolic “end products”, it fails for many metabolites because of the dynamics associated with their production and turnover. In metabolites that turn over, static concentration is a poor predictor of defensive investment.

Key words

Carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis Plant defense Snowshoe hare Balsam poplar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bigger CM, Oechel WC (1982) Nutrient effect on maximum photosynthesis in arctic plants. Holarct. Ecology 5:158–163Google Scholar
  2. Bryant JP (1987) Feltleaf willow-snowshoe hare interactions. Plant carbon/nutrient balance and its implications for floodplain succession. Ecology 68:1319–1327Google Scholar
  3. Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368Google Scholar
  4. Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP (1987a) Response of winter chemical defense in Alaska paper birch and green alder to manipulation of plant carbon/nutrient balance. Oecologia 72:510–514Google Scholar
  5. Bryant JP, Clausen TP, Reichardt PB, McCarthy MC, Werner RA (1987b) Effect of nitrogen fertilization upon the secondary chemistry and nutritional value of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Mich.) leaves for the large aspen tortrix (Choristoneura conflictanta (Walker)). Oecologia 73:413–517Google Scholar
  6. Chapin III FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260Google Scholar
  7. Chapin III FS (1991) Integrated responses of plants to stress: A centralized system of physiological responses. Bioscience 41:29–36Google Scholar
  8. Chapin III FS, Schulze E, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology of economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–47Google Scholar
  9. Chapin III FS, Tryon PR, Van Cleve K (1983) Influence of phosphorus on growth and biomass distribution of Alaskan taiga tree seedlings. Can J For Res 13:1092–1098Google Scholar
  10. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 22:895–899Google Scholar
  11. Croteau R (1987) Biosynthesis and catabolism of monterpenoids. Chem Rev 87:929–954Google Scholar
  12. Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The pholosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TJ (eds) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  13. Gottleib OR (1990) Phytochemicals: Differentiation and function. Phytochemistry 29:1715–1724Google Scholar
  14. Hefendchl FW, Underhill EW, von Rudloff E (1967) The biosynthesis of the oxygenated monoterpenes of mint. Phytochemistry 6:823–828Google Scholar
  15. Hemingway RW, Karchesy JJ (1989) Chemistry and significance of condensed tannins. Plenum Press. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffman P (1986) Ecophysiological aspects of biomass production in higher plants. Photosynthes Res 7:3–18Google Scholar
  17. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211Google Scholar
  18. Kedrowski RA (1983) Extraction and analysis of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon fractions in plant material. H Plant Nutr 6:989–1011Google Scholar
  19. Lapinjoki SP, Elo HA, Taipale T. (1991) Development and structure of resin glands on tissues of Betula pendula Roth. during growth. New Phytol (in Press)Google Scholar
  20. Larsson S, Wiren A, Lundgren L, Ericsson T (1986) Effects of light and nutrient stress on leaf phenolic chemistry in Salix dasyclados susceptibility to Galerucella lineola (coleoptera). Oikos 47:205–210Google Scholar
  21. MacLeod NJ, Pridham JB (1966) Observations of the translocation of phenolic compounds. Phytochemistry 5:677–680Google Scholar
  22. Matson PA, Waring RH (1984) Effects of nutrient and light limitation on mountain hemlock: susceptibility to laminated root rot. Ecology 65:1517–1524Google Scholar
  23. Mattes BR, Clausen TP, Reichardt PB (1987) Volatile constituents of balsam poplar: the phenol glycoside connection. Phytochemistry 26:1361–1366Google Scholar
  24. McKey D (1979) The distribution of secondary metabolites within plants. In: Rosenthall GA, Janzen DH (eds). Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 56–134Google Scholar
  25. Mihaliak CA, Lincoln DE (1985) Growth pattern and carbon allocation to volatile leaf terpenes under nitrogen-limiting conditions in Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia 66:423–426Google Scholar
  26. Mihaliak CA, Gershenzon J, Croteau R (1991) Lack of rapid monoterpene turnover in rooted plants: Implications for theories of plant chemical defense. OecologiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Mole S, Ross JAM, Waterman PG (1988) Light-induced variation in phenoloic levels in foliage of rain-forest plants. I. Chemical changes. J Chem Ecol 14:1–22Google Scholar
  28. Muzika RM, Pregtzer KS, Hanover JW (1989) Changes in terpene production following nitrogen fertilization of grand fir (Abies grandis (Dougl.) Lindl.) seedlings. Oecologia 80:485–489Google Scholar
  29. Reichardt PB, Bryant JP, Clausen TP, Wieland GD (1984) Defense of winter-dormant Alaskan paper birch against snowshoe hares. Oecologia 65:58–69Google Scholar
  30. Reichardt PB, Bryant JP, Mattes BR, Clausen TP, Chapin FS III, Meyer M (1990) The winter chemical defense of balsam poplar against snowshoe hares. J Chem Ecol 16:1941–1959Google Scholar
  31. Sarkanen KV, Ludwig CH (1971) Lignins: Occurrence, formation, structure and reactions. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Swain T (1979) Tannins and Lignins. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Academic, New York, pp 657–682Google Scholar
  33. Thieme H, Benecke R (1970) Die Phenolglykoside der Salicaceae. Pharmazie 25:227–231Google Scholar
  34. Van Cleve K, Chapin FS III, Dyrness CT, Viereck LA (1991) Element cycling in taiga forests: State-factor control. Bioscience 41:78–88Google Scholar
  35. Van Cleve K, Oliver L, Schlentner R, Viereck LA (1983) Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Can J For Res 13:747–766Google Scholar
  36. Van Cleve K, Viereck LA (1981) Forest succession in relation to nutrient cycling in the boreal forest of Alaska. In: West DC, Shugart H, Botkin DB (eds). Forest succession: Concepts and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 185–211Google Scholar
  37. Vickery ML, Vickery V (1981) Secondary Plant Chemistry. University Park Press. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  38. Walker LR, Chapin III FS (1986) Physiological controls over seedling growth in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology 67:1508–1523Google Scholar
  39. Waring RH, McDonald AJS, Larsson SS, Ericsson T, Wiren A, Arwidsson E, Ericsson A, Lohammer T (1985) Differences in chemical composition of plants grown at constant relative growth rates with stable mineral nutrition. Oecologia 66:157–160Google Scholar
  40. Waterman PG, Ross JAM, McKey DB (1984) Factors affecting levels of some phenolic compounds, digestibility, and nitrogen content of the mature leaves of Barteria fistulosa (Passifloraceae). J Chem Ecol 10:387–401Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. B. Reichardt
    • 1
  • F. S. ChapinIII
    • 1
  • J. P. Bryant
    • 2
  • B. R. Mattes
    • 1
  • T. P. Clausen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of AlaskaFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of AlaskaFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations