Oecologia

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 177–182 | Cite as

Tritrophic interactions between aphids (Aphis jacobaeae Schrank), ant species, Tyria jacobaeae L., and Senecio jacobaea L. lead to maintenance of genetic variation in pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration

  • Klaas Vrieling
  • Wouter Smit
  • Ed van der Meijden
Original Papers

Summary

We hypothesize that the tritrophic interaction between ants, the aphid Aphis jacobaeae, the moth Tyria jacobaeae, and the plant Senecio jacobaea can explain the genetic variation observed in pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration in natural populations of S. jacobaea. The ant Lasius niger effectively defends S. jacobaea plants infested with A. jacobaeae against larvae of T. jacobaeae. S. jacobaea plants with A. jacobaeae which are defended by ants escape regular defoliation by T. jacobaeae. Plants with aphids and ants have a lower pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration than plants without aphids and ants. When these data are fitted to an existing theoretical model for temporal variation in fitness it is shown that varying herbivore pressure by T. jacobaeae in interaction with ants defending aphid-infested plants with a low pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration can lead to a stable polymorphism in pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration. Costs of the production and maintenance of pyrrolizidine alkaloids are not accounted for in the model.

Key words

Senecio jacobaea Tritrophic interactions Genetic variation Pyrrolizidine alkaloids Herbivory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aplin RT, Rothschild M (1972) Poisonous alkaloids in the body tissues of the Garden Tiger Moth (Arctia caja L.) and the Cinnabar Moth (Tyria (=Callimorpha), jacobaeae L.) (Lepidoptera) In: Vries A de, Kochva E (eds), Toxins of animal and plant origin. Gordon & Breach, London, pp 579–595Google Scholar
  2. Aplin RT, Benn MH, Rothschild M (1968) Poisonous alkaloids in the body tissues of the Cinnabar Moth (Callimorpha jacobaeae L.) Nature 219:747–748Google Scholar
  3. Bentley MD, Leonard DE, Stoddard WF, Zalkow LH (1984) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as larval feeding deterrents for Spruce Budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 77: 393–397Google Scholar
  4. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: Wild Parsnips and the Parnsnip Webworm. Evolution: 40:1215–1228Google Scholar
  5. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Lee K (1989) Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore. Oecologia 80:501–506Google Scholar
  6. Brown DG (1988) The cost of plant defense: an experimentel analysis with inducible proteinase inhibitors in Tomato. Oecologia 76:467–470Google Scholar
  7. Buckley R (1987) Ant — plant — homopteran interactions. Adv Ecol Res 16:53–85Google Scholar
  8. Cates RG, Redak RA (1989) Variation in terpene chemistry of Douglas-fir and its relationship to western Spruce Budworm success. In: Spencer KC (ed.) Chemical mediation of coevolution. Acad Press Inc., San Diego, pp 317–344Google Scholar
  9. Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–223Google Scholar
  10. Coley PD (1986) Costs and benefits of defense by tannins in a neotropical tree. Oecologia 70:238–241Google Scholar
  11. Crawley MJ, Gillman MP (1989) Population dynamics of Cinnabar Moth and Ragwort in grassland. J Anim Ecol 58:1035–1050Google Scholar
  12. Dempster JP, Lakhani KH (1979) A population model for Cinnabar Moth and its foodplant, Ragwort. J Anim Ecol 48:143–163Google Scholar
  13. Dreyer DL, Jones KC, Molyneux RJ (1985) Feeding deterrency of some pyrrolizidine, indolizidine, and quinolizidine alkaloids towards Pea Aphid (Acyrtosiphon pisum) and evidence for phloem transport of indolizidine alkaloid swainsonine. J Chem Ecol 11:1045–1051Google Scholar
  14. Ernst WHO (1987) Impact of the aphid Aulocorthum solani KLTB. on growth and reproduction of winter and summer annual life forms of Senecio sylvaticus L. Acta Oecol/Oecol Gener 8:537–547Google Scholar
  15. Gould F (1983) Genetics of plant-herbivore systems: interactions between applied and basic study. — In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds), Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Acad Press, New York pp 599–653Google Scholar
  16. Haldane JBS, Jayakar SD (1963) Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. J Genet 58:237–242Google Scholar
  17. Hanover JW (1966) Genetics of terpenes. I. Gene control of monoterpene levels in Pinus monticola Dougl. Heredity 21:73–84Google Scholar
  18. Hartmann T, Zimmer M (1986) Organ specific distribution and accumulation of pyrrolizidine alkaloids during the life history of two annual Senecio species. J Plant Physiol 112:67–80Google Scholar
  19. Hartmann T, Ehmke A, Eilert U, Borstel K von, Theuring C (1989) Sites of synthesis, translocation and accumulation of pyrrolizidine alkaloid N-oxides in Senecio vulgaris L. Planta 177:98–107Google Scholar
  20. Heie OE (1986) The aphidoidea (Hemiptera of Fennoscandia and Denmark. III) — Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 17:180–181 E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press Ltd. Leiden CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson AE, Molyneux RJ, Merrill GB (1985) Chemistry of toxic range plants. Variation in pyrrolizidine alkaloid content of Senecio, Amsinckia and Crotolaria species. J Agric Food Chem 33:50–55Google Scholar
  22. Kakes P (1989) An analysis of the costs and benefits of the cyanogenic system in Trifolium repens L. Theor Appl Gen 77:111–118Google Scholar
  23. Krischik VA, Denno RF (1983) Individual, population, and geographic patterns in plant defense. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds). Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Acad Press, New York, pp 463–512Google Scholar
  24. Mattocks AR (1967) Spectrophotometric determination of unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Anal Chem 34:443–447Google Scholar
  25. Messina FJ (1981) Plant protection as a consequence of an antmembracid mutualism: interactions on Goldenrod (Solidago sp.) Ecology 62:1433–1440Google Scholar
  26. Myers JH (1980) Is the insect or the plant the driving force in the Cinnabar Moth — Tansy Ragwort system? Oecologia 47:16–21Google Scholar
  27. Pieters LAC, Zoelen AM van, Vrieling K, Vlietinck AJ (1989) Determination of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Senecio jacobaeae by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Mag Res Chem 27:754–759Google Scholar
  28. Prins AH (1990) Herbivory and plant performance of Senecio jacobaea L. and Cynoglossum officinale L. Thesis LeidenGoogle Scholar
  29. Østrem L (1987) Studies on genetic variation in reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L. I. Alkaloid type and concentration. Hereditas 107:235–248Google Scholar
  30. Rausher M, Simms EL (1989) The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43:563–572Google Scholar
  31. Roughgarden J (1979) Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: An introduction. Macmillan Publ Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Segall HJ (1978) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids derived from Senecio jacobaea. Toxic Let 1:279–284Google Scholar
  33. Segall HJ, Krick TP (1979) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids: organohalogen derivative isolated from Senecio jacobaeae (Tansy Ragwort). Toxic Let 4:193–198Google Scholar
  34. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1987) Costs and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. Am Nat 130:570–581Google Scholar
  35. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1989) The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. II. Natural selection by insects and costs of resistance. Evolution 43:573–585Google Scholar
  36. Steiner AA (1968) Soilless culture. Proc 6th Coll Int Potash Inst, Florence, Italy:324–341. International Potash Institute, Berne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Meijden E (1973) Experiments on dispersal, late-larval predation, and pupation in the Cinnabar Moth (Tyria jacobaeae L.) with a radioactive label (192Ir). Neth J Zool 23:430–445Google Scholar
  38. Van der Meijden E (1979) Herbivore exploitation of a fugitive plant species: local survival and extinction of the Cinnabar Moth and Ragwort in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia 42:307–323Google Scholar
  39. Van der Meijden E, Bemmelen M van, Kooi R, Post BJ (1984) Nutritional quality and chemical defence in the Ragwort-Cinnabar Moth interaction. J Anim Ecol 53:443–453Google Scholar
  40. Van der Meijden E, Zoelen AM van, Soldaat LL (1989) Oviposition by the Cinnabar Moth, Tyria jacobaeae, in relation to nitrogen, sugars and alkaloids of Ragwort, Senecio jacobaea. Oikos 54:337–344Google Scholar
  41. Von Borstel K, Witte L, Hartmann T (1989) Pyrrolizidine alkaloid patterns in populations of Senecio vulgaris, S. vernalis and their hybrids. Phytochem 28:1635–1638Google Scholar
  42. Wink M (1987) Chemical ecology of quinolizidine alkaloids. In: Waller GR (ed) Allelochemicals: Role in agriculture and forestry. ACS Symp Ser 330:524–533Google Scholar
  43. Wink M, Witte L (1984) Turnover and transport of quinolizidine alkaloids. Diurnal fluctuations of lupanine in the phloem sap, leaves and fruits of Lupinus alba L. Planta 161:519–524Google Scholar
  44. Zúñiga GE, Corcuera GE (1986) Effect of gramine in the resistance of barley seedlings to the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Entomol Exp Appl 40:259–262Google Scholar
  45. Zúñiga GE, Salgado MS, Corcuera LJ (1985) Role of an indole alkaloid in the resistance of barley seedlings to aphids. Phytochem 24:945–947Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaas Vrieling
    • 1
  • Wouter Smit
    • 1
  • Ed van der Meijden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Population Biology, Research Group Ecology of Plants and HerbivoresUniversity of LeidenRA LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations