Oecologia

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 383–390 | Cite as

Phenotypic plasticity of Daphnia pulex in the presence of invertebrate predators: morphological and life history responses

  • Julia Lüning
Original Papers

Abstract

Morphological and life history traits of two clones of the cladoceran Daphnia pulex were measured in the presence and absence of size-selective insect predators, the midge larva Chaoborus flavicans, which preys on small Daphnia, and the water bug Notonecta glauca, which preys on large Daphnia. The aim was to detect predator-induced phenotypic changes, particularly the effect of simultaneous exposure to both types of predators. Other work has shown that in the presence of Chaoborus americanus, Daphnia pulex produce a socalled neck spine which may carry several teeth. The morphological modifications are supposed to serve as an anti-predator device. Furthermore, females exposed to Chaoborus often delay their maturation; this has been interpreted as a cost that balances the benefits of the neck teeth. In this investigation, females of both clones produced fewer but larger offspring than control animals when reared in the presence of Chaoborus flavicans. The offspring showed the typical neck spine and delayed first reproduction. In the presence of Notonecta glauca, one of the clones produced more and smaller offspring, and maturation occurred at earlier instars. The other clone also produced more offspring than the control but there was no size difference. When both predators were present, in most cases the reactions of the daphnids were similar to those in the Notonecta experiment. The response to Chaoborus appeared to be suppressed. The observed modifications are interpreted as evolved strategies that reduce the impact of size-selective predation. They are consistent with predictions of life-history theory.

Key words

Daphnia pulex Chaoborus Notonecta Phenotypic plasticity Inducible defence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler FR, Harvell CD (1990) Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic Environments. Trends Ecol Evol 5:407–410Google Scholar
  2. Black AR, Dodson SI (1990) Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 83:117–123Google Scholar
  3. Dodson SI (1974) Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: A new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol Oceanogr 19:721–729Google Scholar
  4. Dodson SI (1989) Predator-induced reaction norms. Cyclic changes in shape and size can be protective. Bio Science 39:447–452Google Scholar
  5. Dodson SI (1989) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia 78:361–367Google Scholar
  6. Dodson SI, Havel JE (1988) Indirect prey effects: Some morphological and life history responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to Notonecta undulata. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1274–1285Google Scholar
  7. Elser MM, von Ende CN, Sorrano P, Carpenter SR (1987) Chaoborus populations: response to food web manipulation and potential effects on zooplankton communities. Can J Zool 65:2846–2852Google Scholar
  8. Gießler S (1982) Schwimmcharakteristiken von Daphnia cucullata und Daphnia hyalina. Diplom-thesis, LMU MünchenGoogle Scholar
  9. Grant JWG, Bayly IAE (1981) Predator induction of crests in morphs of the Daphnia carinata King complex. Limnol Oceanogr 26:201–218Google Scholar
  10. Hanazato T, Yasuno M (1989) Zooplankton community structure driven by vertebrate and invertebrate predators. Oecologia 81:450–458Google Scholar
  11. Harvell DC (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65:323–341Google Scholar
  12. Havel JE (1985) Cyclomorphoses of Daphnia pulex spined morphs. Limnol Oceanogr 30:853–861Google Scholar
  13. Havel JE, Dodson SI (1984) Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: Behavioral observations. Limnol Oceanogr 29:487–494Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs J (1967) Untersuchungen zur Funktion und Evolution der Zyklomorphose bei Daphnia, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Selektion durch Fische. Arch Hydrobiol 62:467–541Google Scholar
  15. Krueger DA, Dodson SI (1981) Embryological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 26:219–223Google Scholar
  16. Lynch M (1979) Predation, competition, and zooplankton comunity structure: An experimental study. Limnol Oceanogr 24:353–272Google Scholar
  17. Lynch M (1980) Predation, enrichment and the evolution of cladoceran life histories: A theoretical approach. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 367–377Google Scholar
  18. McArdle BH, Lawton IH (1979) Effects of prey-size and predatorinstar on the predation of Daphnia by Notonecta. Ecol Entomol 4:267–275Google Scholar
  19. Reznik D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation in life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177Google Scholar
  20. Reznik DA, Bryga H, Endler JA (1990) Experimentally induced life-history evolution in natural populations. Nature 346:357–359Google Scholar
  21. Riessen HP, Sprules GW (1990) Demographic costs of antipredator defenses in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71:1536–1546Google Scholar
  22. Scott AM, Murdoch WW (1983) Selective predation by the back-swimmer, Notonecta. Limnol Oceanogr 28:352–366Google Scholar
  23. Swift MC, Fedorenko AY (1975) Some aspects of prey capture by Chaoborus larvae. Limnol Oceanogr 20:418–425Google Scholar
  24. Swift MC, Forward RB (1981) Chaoborus prey capture efficiency in the light and dark. Limnol Oceanogr 26:461–466Google Scholar
  25. Threlkeld ST (1987) Daphnia life history strategies and resource allocation patterns. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol Dott Marco de Marchi Pallanta Italy 45:353–366Google Scholar
  26. Vuorinen I, Ketola M, Walls M (1989) Defensive spine formation in Daphnia pulex Leydig and Chaoborus chrystallinus de Geer. Limnol Oceanogr 34:243–248Google Scholar
  27. Walls M, Ketola M (1989) Effects of predator induced spines on individual fitness in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 34:390–396Google Scholar
  28. Walls M, Caswell H, Ketola M (1991) Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defences in Daphnia pulex: a sensitivity analysis. Oecologia 87:43–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Lüning
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der UniversitätMünchen 2Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations