Oecologia

, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 72–75 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in the diets of migrant and non-migrant nectarivorous bats as revealed by carbon stable isotope analysis

  • Theodore H. Fleming
  • Robert A. Nuñez
  • Leonel da Silveira Lobo Sternberg
Original Papers

Abstract

Three species of nectar-feeding bats migrate from tropical and subtropical Mexico into the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts during the spring and summer months. We examined geographic and seasonal changes in the diet of one migrant species, Leptonycteris curasoae, using carbon stable isotope techniques to determine the relative importance of C3 and CAM (Cactaceae, Agavaceae) plants in its diet. We also examined the diet of a non-migratory nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, from southern Mexico using the same techniques. We found that L. curasoae feeds extensively or exclusively on CAM plants during migration and in the northern part of its range and feeds mostly on C3 plants in southern Mexico. This bat is a year-round resident on Baja California where it is a CAM specialist. The non-migrant G. soricina feeds mostly on C3 plants year-round. Phenological data suggest that certain species of columnar cacti and at least one group of paniculate Agaves on the Mexican mainland provide a spatio-temporally predictable nectar corridor along which nectarivorous bats may migrate in the spring and fall, respectively. Different flowering schedules of Agaves in Baja California appear to promote year-round dietary specialization and perhaps non-migratory behavior in nectar-feeding bats living there.

Key words

Nectarivory Stable isotopes Bats Migration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez T, Gonzalez QL (1970) Analisis polinico del contenido gastrico de murcielagos Glossophaginae de Mexico. An. Escuela Nac Cienc Biol 18:137–165Google Scholar
  2. Barbour RW, Davis WH (1969) Bats of America. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender MM (1971) Variations in 13C/12C ratios of plants in relation to the pathway of carbon dioxide fixation. Phytochemistry 10:1239–1244Google Scholar
  4. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1979) Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022–1035Google Scholar
  5. Cockrum EL (1991) Seasonal distribution of northwestern populations of the long-nosed bats, Leptonycteris sanborni Family Phyllostomidae. Anal Instit Biol Univ Nac Auton Mexico Ser Zool 62:181–202Google Scholar
  6. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:495–506Google Scholar
  7. Fleming TH (1992) How do fruit-and nectar-feeding birds and mammals track their food resources? In: Hunter MD, Ohgushi T, Price PW (eds) Effects of resource distribution on plantanimal interactions. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, pp 355–391Google Scholar
  8. Gardner AL (1977) Food habits. In: Baker RJ, Jones Jr. JK, Carter DC (eds) Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomidae, part 1. Spec. Publ. Museum Texas Tech Univ. No. 13:293–350Google Scholar
  9. Gentry HS (1982) Agaves of continental North America. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant KA, Grant V (1968) Hummingbirds and their flowers. Columbia University Press, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Heithaus ER, Fleming TH, Opler PA (1975) Foraging patterns and resource utilization in seven species of bats in a seasonal tropical forest. Ecology 56:841–854Google Scholar
  12. Howell DJ (1979) Flock foraging in nectar-feeding bats: advantages to the bats and to the host plants. Am Nat 114:23–49Google Scholar
  13. Howell DJ, Roth BS (1981) Sexual reproduction in agaves: the benefits of bats; the cost of semelparous advertising. Ecology 62:1–7Google Scholar
  14. Osmond CB, Allaway WG, Sutton BG, Troughton JH, Queiroz O, Luttge U, Winter K (1973) Carbon isotope discrimination in photosynthesis of CAM plants. Nature (London) 246:41–42Google Scholar
  15. Quiroz DL, Xelhuatzi MS, Zamora MC (1986) Analisis palinologico del contenido gastrointestinal de los murcielagos Glossophaga soricina y Leptonycteris yerabuenae de las Grutas de Juxtlahuaca, Guerrero. Instit Nac Antrop Histor Serie Prehistoria, 1–62Google Scholar
  16. Tieszen LL, Boutton TW, Tesdahl KG, Slade NA (1983) Fractionation and turnover of stable carbon isotopes in animal tissues: implications for δ 13C analysis of diet. Oecologia 57:32–37Google Scholar
  17. Waser NM, Real LA (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature (London) 281:670–672Google Scholar
  18. Wiggins IL (1980) Flora of Baja California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. WoloszynD, WoloszynBW (1982) Los mammiferos de la Sierra de la Laguna, Baja California Sur. CONACYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore H. Fleming
    • 1
  • Robert A. Nuñez
    • 1
  • Leonel da Silveira Lobo Sternberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations