Oecologia

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 151–155

Chaoborus crystallinus predation on Daphnia pulex: can induced morphological changes balance effects of body size on vulnerability?

  • Ralph Tollrian
Original Paper

Abstract

Juvenile Daphnia pulex form neckteeth in reponse to chemicals released by predatory Chaoborus crystallinus larvae. Formation of neckteeth is strongest in the second instar followed by the third instar, whereas only small neckteeth are found in the first and fourth instar of experimental clones. Predation experiments showed that body-size-dependent vulnerability of animals without neckteeth to fourth instar C. crystallinus larvae matched the pattern of neckteeth formation over the four juvenile instars. Predation experiments on D. pulex of the same clone with neckteeth showed that vulnerability to C. crystallinus predation is reduced, and that the induced protection is correlated with the degree of neckteeth formation. The pattern of neckteeth formation in successive instars is probably adaptive, and it can be concluded that neckteeth are formed to different degrees in successive instars as an evolutionary compromise to balance prediation risk and protective costs.

Key words

Predation Inducible defences Phenotypic plasticity Daphnia Neckteeth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black AR, Dodson SI (1990) Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 83:117–122Google Scholar
  2. Dodson SI (1974) Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: a new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol Oceanogr 19:721–729Google Scholar
  3. Dodson SI (1975) Predation rates of zooplankton in arctic ponds. Limnol Oceanogr 20:426–433Google Scholar
  4. Dodson SI (1988) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for zooplankton: predator-avoidance behavior in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1431–1439Google Scholar
  5. Duhr B (1955) Über Bewegung, Orientierung und Beutefang der Corthralarve (Chaoborus crystallinus de Geer). Zool Jahrb 65:387–429Google Scholar
  6. Gerritsen J, Strickler JR (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J Fish Res Board Can 34:73–82Google Scholar
  7. HavelJE, Dodson SI (1984) Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: behavioral observations. Limnol Oceanogr 29:487–494Google Scholar
  8. Havel JE, Dodson SI (1987) Reproductive costs of Chaoborus-induced polymorphism in Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia 150:273–281Google Scholar
  9. Hebert PDN, Grewe PM (1985) Chaoborus-induced shifts in the morphology of Daphnia ambigua. Limnol Oceanogr 30:1291–1297Google Scholar
  10. Krueger DA, Dodson SI (1981) Embryological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 26:219–223Google Scholar
  11. Larsson P, Dodson SI (1993) Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch Hydrobiol 129:129–155Google Scholar
  12. Parejko K (1991) Predation by chaoborids on typical and spined Daphnia pulex. Freshwat Biol 25:211–217Google Scholar
  13. Pastorok RA (1980) Selection of prey by Chaoborus larvae: a review and new evidence for behavioral flexibility. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. New England, Hanover, pp 538–554Google Scholar
  14. Pastorok RA (1981) Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecology 62:1311–1324Google Scholar
  15. Ramcharan CW, Dodson SI, Lee J (1992) Predation risk, prey behavior, and feeding rate in Daphnia pulex. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:159–165Google Scholar
  16. Riessen HP, Sprules WG (1990) Demographic costs of antipredator defenses in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71:1536–1546Google Scholar
  17. Riessen HP, O'Brien WJ, Loveless B (1984) An analysis of the components of Chaoborus predation on zooplankton and the calculation of relative prey vulnerabilities. Ecology 65:514–522Google Scholar
  18. Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyle: an evolutionary and ecological overvie. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. New England, Hanover, pp 203–224Google Scholar
  19. Swift MC (1992) Prey capture by the four larval instars of Chaoborus crystallinus. Limnol Oceanogr 37:14–24Google Scholar
  20. Swift MC, Fedorenko AY (1975) Some aspects of the prey capture by Chaoborus larvae. Limnol Oceanogr 20:418–425Google Scholar
  21. Tollrian R (1993) Neckteeth formation in Daphnia pulex as an example of continuous phenotypic plasticity: morphological effects of Chaoborus kairomone concentration and their quantification. J Plankton Res 15:1309–1318Google Scholar
  22. Tollrian R, Elert E von (1994) Enrichment and purification of Chaoborus kairomone from water: further steps towards its chemical characterization. Limnol Oceanogr 39:788–796Google Scholar
  23. Vanni MJ (1988) Freshwater zooplankton community structure: introduction of large invertebrate predators and large herbivores to a small-species community. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:1758–1770Google Scholar
  24. Vinyard GL, Menger RA (1980) Chaoborus americanus predation on various zooplankters: functional response and behavioral observations. Oecologia 45:90–93Google Scholar
  25. Walls M, Ketola M (1989) Effects of predator-induced spines on individual fitness in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 34:390–396Google Scholar
  26. Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Tollrian
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for LimnologyPlönGermany

Personalised recommendations