Oecologia

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 415–427

The influences of increased CO2 and water supply on growth, biomass allocation and water use efficiency of Sinapis alba L. grown under different wind speeds

  • R. Retuerto
  • F. I. Woodward
Original Papers

Abstract

We examined how independent and interactive effects of CO2 concentrations, water supply and wind speed affect growth rates, biomass partitioning, water use efficiency, diffusive conductance and stomatal density of plants. To test the prediction that wind stress will be ameliorated by increased CO2 and/or by unrestricted water supply we grew Sinapis alba L. plants in controlled chambers under combinations of two levels of CO2 (350 ppmv, 700 ppmv), two water regimes and two wind speeds (0.3 ms−1, 3.7 ms−1). We harvested at ten different dates over a period of 60 days. A growth analysis was carried out to evaluate treatment effects on plant responses. Plants grown both in increased CO2 and in low wind conditions had significantly greater stem length, leaf area and dry weights of plant parts. Water supply significantly affected stem diameter, root weight and leaf area. CO2 enrichment significantly increased the rate of biomass accumulation and the relative ratio of biomass increase to leaf area expansion. High wind speed significantly reduced plant growth rates and the rate of leaf area expansion was reduced more than the rate of biomass accumulation. Regression analysis showed significant CO2 effects on the proportion of leaf and stem dry weight to total dry weight. A marked plant-age effect was dependent on water supply, wind speed and CO2 concentration. A reduced water supply significantly decreased the stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency significantly increased with a limited water supply, low wind and increased CO2. We found significant CO2 x wind effects for water diffusion resistance, adaxial number of stomata and water use efficiencies and significant wind x water effect for water use efficiency. In conclusion, wind stress was ameliorated by growing in unrestricted water but not by growing in increased CO2.

Key words

Allocation CO2 Growth analysis Relative growth rates Stomatal density Water stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerly DD, Coleman JS, Morse SR, Bazzaz FA (1992) CO2 and temperature effects on leaf area production in two annual plant species. Ecology 73:1260–1269Google Scholar
  2. Aronson J, Kigel J, Shmida A, Klein J (1992) Adaptive phenology of desert and Mediterranean populations of annual plants grown with and without water stress. Oecologia 89: 17–26Google Scholar
  3. Bazzaz FA (1990) The reponse of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21: 167–196Google Scholar
  4. Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW (1984) The response of plants, to elevated CO2, I. Competition among an assembage of annuals at two levels of soil moisture. Oecologia 62: 196–198Google Scholar
  5. Bazzaz FA, Garbutt K, Reekie EG, Williams WE (1989) Using growth analysis to interpret competition between a C3 and a C4 annual under ambient and elevated CO2 Oecologia 79: 223–233Google Scholar
  6. Braam J, Davis RW (1990) Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis. Cell 60: 357–364Google Scholar
  7. Chaves MM (1991) Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot 42: 1–16Google Scholar
  8. Clark WC (1982) Carbon dioxide review. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman JS, Bazzaz FA (1992) Effects of CO2 and temperature on growth and resource use of co-ocurring C3 and C4 annuals. Ecology 73: 1244–1259Google Scholar
  10. Conway TJ, Tans P, Waterman LS, Thoning KW, Masarie KA, Gammon RM (1988) Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in the remote global troposphere 1981–1984. Tellus 40B: 81–115Google Scholar
  11. Cure JD, Acock B (1986) Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agr Forest Meteorol 38: 127–145Google Scholar
  12. Dixon M, Grace J (1984). Effect of wind on the transpiration of young trees. Ann bot 53: 811–819Google Scholar
  13. DeLucia EH, Thomas WS, Strain, BR (1985) Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynth Res 7: 175–184Google Scholar
  14. Eamus D, Jarvis PG (1989) The direct effects of increases in the global atmospheric concentration of CO2 on natural and temperate trees and forests. Adv Ecol Res 19: 1–49Google Scholar
  15. Ehret DL, Joliffe PA (1985) Photosynthetic carbon dioxide exchange of bean plants grown at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Can J Bot 63: 2026–2030Google Scholar
  16. Garbutt K, Williams WE, Bazzaz FA (1990) Analysis of the differential response of five annuals to elevated CO2 during growth. Ecology 71: 1185–1194Google Scholar
  17. Grace J, Russell G (1977) The effect of wind on grasses III. Influence of continuous drought or wind on anatomy and water relations in Festuca arundinacea Schreb. J Exp Bot 28 268–278Google Scholar
  18. Grace J, Russell G (1982) The effect of wind and a reduced supply of water on the growth and water relations of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Ann Bot 49: 217–225Google Scholar
  19. Grace J, Wilson J (1976) The boundary layer over a Populus leaf. J Exp Bot 28: 268–278Google Scholar
  20. Griggs RF (1938) Timberlines in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecology 19: 548–564Google Scholar
  21. Herold A (1980) Regulation of photosynthesis by sink activity-the missing link. New Phytol 86: 131–144Google Scholar
  22. Houghton RA (1988). The global carbon cycle (letter to the editor). Science 241: 1736Google Scholar
  23. Houghton RA, Hobbie JE, Melillo JM, Moore B, Peterson BJ, Shaver GR, Woodwell DM (1983) Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol Monogr 53: 235–262Google Scholar
  24. Hunt R (1982) Plant growth curves: the functional approach to plant growth analysis. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Idso SB, Kimball BA, Anderson MG, Mauney JR (1987) Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth: the interactive role of air temperature. Agric Ecosyst Environ 20: 1–10Google Scholar
  26. Jarvis PG (1989) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forest. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 324: 369–392Google Scholar
  27. Jones P, Jones JW, Allen LHJr (1985) Seasonal carbon and water balances of soybeans grown under stress treatments in sunlit chambers. Trans ASAE 28: 2021–2028Google Scholar
  28. Kalma JD, Kuiper F (1966) Transpiration and growth of Phaseolus vulgaris as affected by wind-speed. Med Landbouwhogesch Wageningen 66: 1–9Google Scholar
  29. Kozlowski ThT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy JG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic. San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  30. Leite RM de O, Alvim P de T (1978) Efeito do vento e da radiacao solar na ruptura do pulvinulo foliar do cacaveiro (Thebroma cacao L.). Inf. Tec. Centro Pesqui. Cacao 1977/1978, Commissao Executiva da Recuperaco da Lavoura Cacaveira, pp 65–66Google Scholar
  31. Madsen E (1973) Effect of CO2 concentration on the morphological, histological and cytological changes in tomato plants. Acta Agricult Scand 23: 241–246Google Scholar
  32. Morison JIL, Gifford RM (1984a) Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentration. 1. Leaf area, water use and transpiration. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 361–374Google Scholar
  33. Morison JIL, Gifford RM (1984b) Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentration. 2. Plant dry weight, partitioning and water use efficiency. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 375–384Google Scholar
  34. Morse RN, Evans LT (1962) Design and development of CERES — an Australian phytotron. J Agr Eng Res 7: 128–140Google Scholar
  35. Nijs I, Impens I, Behaeghe T (1988) Effects of long-term elevated CO2 concentration on Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens canopies in the course of a terminal drought stress period. Can J Bot 67: 2720–2725Google Scholar
  36. Pagel MD, Harvey PH (1988) Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data. Q Rev Biol 63: 413–440Google Scholar
  37. Penuelas J, Matamala R (1990) Changes in N and S leaf content, stomatal density and specific leaf area of 14 plant species during the last three centuries of CO2 increase. J Exp Bot 41: 1119–1124Google Scholar
  38. Prior SA, Rogers HH, Sionit N, Patterson RP (1991) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on water relations of soya bean. Agr Ecosyst Environ 35: 13–25Google Scholar
  39. Pugnaire FI, Chapin III FS (1992) Environmental and physiological factors governing nutrient resorption efficiency in barley. Oecologia 90: 120–126Google Scholar
  40. Oberbauer SF, Strain BR, Fetcher N (1985) Effects of CO2 enrichment on seedling physiology and growth of two tropical species. Physiol Plant 65: 352–356Google Scholar
  41. Ramanathan V (1988) The greenhouse theory of climate change: a test by an inadvertent global experiment. Science 240: 293–299Google Scholar
  42. Retuerto R, Woodward FI (1992) Effects of windspeed on the growth and biomass allocation of white mustard Sinapis alba L. Oecologia 92: 113–123Google Scholar
  43. Rotty RM, Marland G (1986) Fossil fuel consumption: recent amounts, patterns, and trends of CO2. In: Trabalka JR, Reichle DE (eds) The changing carbon cycle: a global analysis. Springer New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell G, Grace J (1978) The effect of windspeed on the growth of grasses. J Appl Ecol 16: 507–514Google Scholar
  45. Russell G, Grace J (1979) The effect of shelter on the yield of grasses in southern Scotland. J Appl Ecol 16: 319–323Google Scholar
  46. Ryle GJA, Powell CE, Tewson V (1992) Effect of elevated CO2 on the photosynthesis, respiration and growth of perennial ryegrass. J Exp Bot 43: 811–818Google Scholar
  47. Samson DA, Werk KS (1986) Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. Am Nat 127: 667–680Google Scholar
  48. Sena Gomes AR, Kozlowski TT (1989) Responses of seedlings of two varieties of Theobroma cacao to wind. Trop Agric 66: 137–141Google Scholar
  49. Sionit N, Hellmers H, Strain BR (1980) Growth and yield of wheat under CO2 enrichment and water stress. Crop Sci 20: 687–690Google Scholar
  50. Sionit N, Strain BR, Flint EP (1987) Interaction of temperature and CO2 enrichment on soybean: growth and dry matter partitioning. Can J Plant Sci 67: 59–67Google Scholar
  51. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Strain BR (1987) Direct effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 on plants and ccosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 2: 18–21Google Scholar
  53. Strain BR, Bazzaz FA (1983) Terrestrial plant communities. In: Lemon ER (ed) CO2 and Plants. The response of plants to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Westview, Boulder, pp 177–222Google Scholar
  54. Surano KA, Daley PF, Houpis JLJ, Shinn JH, Helms JA, Palasson RJ, Costello MP (1986) Growth and physiological responses of Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex. P. Laws to long-term elevated CO2 concentration. Tree Physiol 2: 243–259Google Scholar
  55. Telewski FW, Jaffe MJ (1986) Thigmomorphogenesis: field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbation. Physiol Plant 66: 227–233Google Scholar
  56. Thomas JF, Harvey CN (1983) Leaf anatomy of four species grown under continuos CO2 enrichment. Bot Gaz 144: 303–309Google Scholar
  57. Tolley LC, Strain BR (1984) Effects of CO2 enrichment on growth of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus tadea seedlings under different irradiance levels. Can J For Res 14: 343–350Google Scholar
  58. Tolley LC, Strain BR (1985) Effects of CO2 enrichment and water-stress on gas-exchange, of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus tadea seedlings grown under different irradiation levels. Oecologia 65: 166–172Google Scholar
  59. Vartinian N (1971) Morphogenetic effect of the hydric factor on the root system of Sinapis alba L. 1. Rhizogenesis and root water potential. Rev Gen Bot 78: 171–183Google Scholar
  60. Warrick RA, Gifford RM, Parry ML (1986) CO2, climate change and agriculture. In: Bolin B, Döös BR, Jäger J Warrick RA (eds) The greenhouse effect, climatic change, and eosystems (SCOPE 29). Wiley Chichester, pp 393–473Google Scholar
  61. Watson RT, Rohde H, Oeschger H, Siegenthaler U (1990) Greenhouse gases and aerosols. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) Climate change. The IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  62. Whitehead FH (1963) Experimental studies of the effect of wind on plant growth and anatomy II. Helianthus annuus. New Phytol 61: 59–62Google Scholar
  63. Whitehead FH (1963) Experimental studies of the effect of wind on plant growth and anatomy III. Soil moisture relations. new Phytol 62: 80–85Google Scholar
  64. Whitehead FH, Luti R (1962) Experimental studies of the effect of wind on plant growth and anatomy I. Zea mays. New Phytol 61: 56–58Google Scholar
  65. Woodward FI (1983) The significance of interspecific differences in specific leaf area to the growth of selected herbaceous species from different altitudes. New Phytol 95: 313–323Google Scholar
  66. Woodward FI (1987) Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from preindustrial levels. Nature 327: 617–618Google Scholar
  67. Woodward FI (1988) The responses of stomata to changes in atmospheric levels of CO2. Plants Today 1: 132–135Google Scholar
  68. Woodward FI, Bazzaz FA (1988) The responses of stomatal density to CO2 partial pressure. J Exp Bot 39: 1771–1781Google Scholar
  69. Woodward FI, Thompson GB, McKee IF (1991) The effects of elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide on individual plants, populations, communities and ecosystems. Ann Bot 67 (Suppl 1): 23–38Google Scholar
  70. Woodwell GM (1988) The global carbon cycle (letter to the editor). Science 241: 1736–1737Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Retuerto
    • 1
  • F. I. Woodward
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany School and Cory Laboratory (Botany Garden)University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Area de Ecologia Facultad de BiologiaUniversidad de SantiagoSantiagoSpain
  3. 3.School of Biological Sciences, Department of Animal and Plant SciencesThe University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations