Oecologia

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 243–249 | Cite as

Manipulation of egg production reveals costs of reproduction in the tree lizard (Urosaurus ornatus)

  • Allan J. Landwer
Original Paper

Abstract

Life-history theory predicts that the allocation of energy to current reproduction is associated with a decrement in future fecundity, future survival, or both. I treated this notion as the “cost hypothesis”, and tested the assumption that current reproduction exacts a “cost” in future survival and fecundity. Surgical manipulations of egg production were applied to natural populations of the tree lizard, Urosaurus ornatus, in south western New Mexico by yolkectomy surgery in two different years. I reduced the number of eggs produced in the first clutch during vitellogenesis by approximately 50% in yolkectomized females relative to controls. Subsequent survival, fecundity, and growth of females were followed for two or three years, depending on the cohort. Treated females in both cohorts showed significantly higher growth and survivorship throughout the experiment than in controls. After 2 years, yolkectomized females had grown an additional 2 mm (snout-vent length) compared to controls, enough for them to add on average an additional egg to their next clutch. This demonstrated a cost in terms of future fecundity through a reduction in growth and an increase in mortality in these lizards.

Key words

Cost of reproduction Experimental manipulation Fecundity Growth Urosaurus ornatus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey RC (1992) Why we should stop trying to measure the cost of reproduction correctly. Oikos 65: 349–352Google Scholar
  2. Ballinger RE (1976) Evolution of life history strategies: implications of recruitment in a lizard population following density manipulations. Southwest Nat 21: 203–208Google Scholar
  3. Ballinger RE (1977) Reproductive strategies: food availability as a source of proximal variation in a lizard. Ecology 58: 628–635Google Scholar
  4. Ballinger RE (1984) Survivorship of the lizard, Urosaurus ornatus linearis, in New Mexico. J Herpetol 18: 480–481Google Scholar
  5. Bell G (1984) Measuring the cost of reproduction, I. The correlational structure of the life table of a plankton rotifer. Evolution 38: 300–313Google Scholar
  6. Bell G, Koufopanou V (1985) The cost of reproduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Calow P (1979) The cost of reproduction — a physiological approach. Biol Rev 54: 23–40Google Scholar
  8. Caswell H (1982) Optimal life histories and the maximization of reproductive value: a general theorem for complex life cycles. Ecology 63: 1218–1222Google Scholar
  9. Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness EH, Albon SD (1982) Red deer —behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunham AE, Miles DB, Reznick DN (1988) Life-history patterns in squamate reptiles. pp. 441–521. In: Gans C, Huey RB (eds) Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16. Alan R. Liss, Inc., NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox JF, Stevens GC (1991) Costs of reproduction in a willow: experimental responses vs. natural variation. Ecology 72: 1013–1023Google Scholar
  13. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195–204Google Scholar
  14. Jones SM, Ballinger RE (1987) Comparative life histories of Holbrookia maculata and Sceloporus undulatus in western Nebraska. Ecology 68: 1828–1838Google Scholar
  15. Lande R (1982) Elements of a quantitative model of life-history evolution. In: Dingle H, hegman J (eds) Evolution and genetics of life histories. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 21–29Google Scholar
  16. Madsen T, Shine R (1993) Costs of reproduction in a population of European adders. Oecologia 94: 488–495Google Scholar
  17. Merriam CH (1898) Life-zones and crop-zones of the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  18. Michel L (1976) Reproduction in a southwest New Mexican populations of Urosaurus ornatus. Southwest Nat 21: 281–299Google Scholar
  19. Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181–197Google Scholar
  20. Nur N (1988) The consequences of brood-size for breeding blue tits. III. Measuring the cost of reproduction: survival, future fecundity and differential dispersal. Evolution 42: 351–362Google Scholar
  21. Parker WS (1973) Natural history notes on the iguanid lizard Urosaurus ornatus. J Herpetol 7: 21–26Google Scholar
  22. Partridge L (1992) Measuring reproductive costs. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 99–100Google Scholar
  23. Partridge L, Harvey PH (1985) Costs of reproduction. Nature 316: 20Google Scholar
  24. Partridge L, Harvey PH (1988) The ecological context of life-history evolution. Science 214: 1449–1455Google Scholar
  25. Pettifor RA (1993) Brood-manipulation experiments. II. A cost of reproduction in blue tits (Parus caeruleus)? J Anim Ecol 62: 145–159Google Scholar
  26. Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44: 257–267Google Scholar
  27. SAS Institute (1991) SAS/SYSTAT user's guide, release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwarzkopf L (1993) Costs of reproduction in water skinks. Ecology 74: 1970–1981Google Scholar
  29. Schwarzkopf L, Shine R (1992) Costs of reproduction in lizards: escape tactics and susceptibility to predation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 17–25Google Scholar
  30. Shine R (1980) “Costs” of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia 46: 92–100Google Scholar
  31. Shine R, Schwarzkopf L (1992) The evolution of reproductive effort in lizards and snakes. Evolution 46: 62–75Google Scholar
  32. Sinervo B, Licht P (1991a). Hormonal and physiological control of clutch size, egg size, and egg shape in side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana): constraints on the evolution of lizard life histories. J Exp Zool 257: 252–264Google Scholar
  33. Sinervo B, Licht P (1991b) Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Science 252: 1300–1303Google Scholar
  34. Sinervo B, Hedges R, Adolph SC (1991) Decreased sprint speed as a cost of reproduction in the lizard Sceloporus occidentalis: variation among populations. J Exp Biol 155: 323–336Google Scholar
  35. Snell H, Jennings RD, Snell HM, Harcourt S (1988) Intrapopulation variance in predator-avoidance performance of Galapagos lava lizards: the interaction of sexual and natural selection. Evol Ecol 2: 353–369Google Scholar
  36. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life history evolution. Funct Ecol 3: 259–268Google Scholar
  37. Tinkle DW (1969) The concept of reproductive effort and its relation to the evolution of life-histories in lizards. Am Nat 103: 501–516Google Scholar
  38. Toumi J, Hakala T, Haukioja E (1983) Alternative concepts of reproductive efforts, costs of reproduction, and selection in life-history evolution. Am Zool 23: 25–34Google Scholar
  39. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100: 687–690Google Scholar
  40. Willson MF (1986) On the costs of reproduction in plants: Acer negundo. Am Midl Nat 115: 204–207Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan J. Landwer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations