Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 162–163

DNA binding assay of methylene chloride in rats and mice

  • H. Ottenwälder
  • H. Peter
Letter to the Editor


  1. ECETOC (1987) Technical Report No. 26: The assessment of carcinogenic hazard for human beings exposed to methylene chloride. European Chemical Industry Ecology & Toxicology Centre, Ave. Louise 250, B-1050 BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  2. Green T (1983) The metabolic activation of dichloromethane and chlorofluoromethane in a bacterial mutation assay using S. typhimurium. Mutat Res 118: 277–288Google Scholar
  3. Green T, Provan WM, Collinge DC, Guest AE (1988) Macromolecular interactions of inhaled methylene chloride in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 93: 1–10Google Scholar
  4. Peter H, Laib RJ, Ottenwälder H, Topp H, Rupprich N, Bolt HM (1985) DNA binding assay of methyl chloride. Arch Toxicol 57: 84–87Google Scholar
  5. Peter H, Föst U, Reinert T, Hallier E, Bolt HM (1987) DNA binding assay of 11-aminoundecanoic acid in rats. Arch Toxicol 61: 86–87Google Scholar
  6. Sheldon T, Richardson CR, Elliott BM (1987) Inactivity of methylene chloride in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 2: 57–59Google Scholar
  7. Simmon VF, Kanhanen V, Tardiff RG (1977) Mutagenic activity of chemicals identified in drinking water. In: Scott D, Bridges BA, Sobels FH (eds) Progress in genetic toxicology. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 249–258Google Scholar
  8. Trueman RW, Ashby J (1987) Lack of UDS activity in the livers of mice and rats exposed to dichloromethane. Environ Mol Mutagen 10: 189–195Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Ottenwälder
    • 1
  • H. Peter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität DortmundDortmund 1Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations