European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 15–19

Motives and perception of healthy volunteers who participate in experiments

  • C. E. M. van Gelderen
  • T. J. F. Savelkoul
  • W. van Dokkum
  • J. Meulenbelt
Originals

Summary

Healthy volunteers who participated in an experiment were asked to complete a questionnaire about their experiences. Special attention was paid to their motives and the informed consent procedure.

The motives of healthy volunteers for participating in a study differed according to age. Young volunteers mostly participated because of the financial compensation, while older volunteers mainly participated to get a medical check-up, which was part of the selection procedure, or because of the benefit that other people might obtain from the results of the experiment.

In most experiments the volunteers were content with the information given about the experiment, which was provided orally and in a hand-out. The information procedure was crucial for the experiment, because optimum information was of the utmost importance in keeping the volunteers motivated during the experiment. Another conclusion was that the researcher should not be afraid that too much information was given. Adequate information was also important in recruiting new volunteers, because they mostly become interested because of information obtained from their predecessors.

A personal approach towards the volunteers during the experiment was appreciated by them and was an important help in keeping the volunteers motivated during the experiment.

Key words

Healthy volunteers Motive for participation questionnaire perception experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bigorra J, Baños JE (1990) Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38: 443–446Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Declaration of Helsinki (1989) Revised in Helsinki by the 18th World Medical Assembly, 1964; revised in Tokyo by the 29th World Medical Assembly, 1975; revised in Venice by the 35th World Medical Assembly, 1983; revised in Hong Kong by the 41st World Medical Assembly, 1989Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickens BM (1979) Criteria of Adequately Informed Consent. In: Howard-Jones N, Bankowski Z (eds) Medical Experimentation and the Protection of Human Right. CIOMS, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hassar M, Pocelinko R, Weintraub M, Nelson D, Thomas G, Lasagna L (1977) Free-living volunteer's motivations and attitudes toward pharmacologic studies in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 21: 515–519Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Royal College of Physicians (1986) Research on Healthy Volunteers. J Roy Coll Physcns London 20/4: 243–257Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turnbull WH, Leeds AR, Edwards GD (1990) Effect of mycoprotein on blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr 52: 646–650Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. M. van Gelderen
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. J. F. Savelkoul
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. van Dokkum
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Meulenbelt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.National Poison Control CentreNational Institute of Public Health and Environmental ProtectionBilthovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Intensive Care and Clinical ToxicologyUtrecht University HospitalUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations