Integrated column arithmetic according to progressive schematisation
Article
- 99 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Following an introduction on the relation between column arithmetic and mental arithmetic in connection with the development of pocket calculators and computers, the characteristics of progressive schematisation are described with regard to column multiplication and column division. In this way, an image is formed of the specific characteristics of this approach to column arithmetic set against the background of traditional “isolated” column arithmetic according to progressive complexity. Research data on the results of the column arithmetic in question are then presented and we close with a summary of this Wiskobas course.
Keywords
Research Data Column Multiplication Mental Arithmetic Pocket Calculator Integrate Column
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bell, A. M., Swan, M., and Taylor, G.: 1981, ‘Choice of operation in verbal problems with decimal numbers’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 399–421.Google Scholar
- Bennedbek, B.: 1984, ‘Is self taught well taught?’, Mathematics Teaching 95, 11–14.Google Scholar
- Bright, G. W.: 1978, ‘Assessing the development of computational skills’, in M. N. Suydam and R. E. Reys (eds.), Developing Computational Skills, N.C.T.M., Reston, pp. 148–163.Google Scholar
- Brown, M.: 1982, ‘Rules without reasons? Some evidence relating to the teaching of routine skills to low attainers in mathematics’, International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 13, 449–461.Google Scholar
- Buxton, L.: 1981, Do You Panic about Maths?, Heineman, London.Google Scholar
- Cockcroft, W. H.: 1982, Mathematics Counts, H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
- Corte, E. de and Verschaffel, L.: 1982a, ‘Eersteklassers en het spel der schoolvraagstukken’, Willem Bartjens 1, 112–118.Google Scholar
- Corte, E. de and Verschaffel, L.: 1982b, ‘Eersteklassers en het spel der schoolvraagstukken (2)’. Willem Bartjens 1, 167–172.Google Scholar
- Corte, E. de, Verschaffel, L., and Verschueren, J.: 1982c, ‘First graders’ solution process in elementary wordproblems’, in A. Vermandel (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME, Antwerpen, pp. 91–97.Google Scholar
- Dekker, A., Heege, H. ter and Treffers, A.: 1982, Cijferend vermenigvuldigen en delen volgens Wiskobas, OW&OC, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Engen, H. van and Gibb, E. G.: 1956, General Mental Functions Associated with Division, Iowa State Teachers College, Cedar Falls.Google Scholar
- Erlwanger, S. H.: 1975, ‘Case studies of children's conceptions of mathematics in IPI-mathematics’, The Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior 1 (2), 157–283.Google Scholar
- Foxman, D. D. (ed.): 1980, Mathematical Development, H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
- Hart, K. (ed.): 1981, Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–16, Murray, London.Google Scholar
- Heege, H. ter: 1978, ‘Testing the maturity for learning the algorithm of multiplication’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 9, 75–83.Google Scholar
- Hutton, J.: 1977, ‘Memoirs of a math teacher 5, Logical reasoning’, Mathematics Teaching 81, 8–12.Google Scholar
- Jong, R. de (ed.): 1977, De abacus, IOWO, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Kratzer, R. O. and Willoughby, S. S.: 1973, ‘A comparison of initially teaching division employing the distributive and Greenwood algorithms with the aid of a manipulative material’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 4, 197–205.Google Scholar
- Laing, R. A. and Meyer, R. A.: 1982, ‘Transitional division algorithms’, Arithmetic Teacher 29, 10–13.Google Scholar
- Levin, J. A.: 1981, ‘Estimation techniques for arithmetic: Every day math and mathematics instruction’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 421–435.Google Scholar
- N.C.T.M.: 1980, An Agenda for Action. Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s, N.C.T.M., Reston.Google Scholar
- Papert, S.: 1980, Mindstorms. Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Harvester Press, Brighton.Google Scholar
- Plunkett, S.: 1979, ‘Decomposition and all that rot’, Mathematics in School 8, 2–5.Google Scholar
- Rengerink, J.: 1983, De staartdeling, OW&OC, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Shumway, R. J. (ed.): 1980, Research in Mathematics Education, N.C.T.M., Reston.Google Scholar
- Suydam, M. N. and Dessart, D. J.: 1980, ‘Skill learning’, in R. J. Shumway (ed.), Research in Mathematics Education, N.C.T.M., Reston.Google Scholar
- Teule Sensacq, P. and Vinrich, G.: 1982, ‘Resolution des problèmes de division en cycle élémentaire dans deux types de situations didactiques’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 13, 177–205.Google Scholar
- Treffers, A.: 1981, ‘Het stomste vak van de wereld (1)’, Willem Bartjens 1, 27–34.Google Scholar
- Treffers, A.: 1982a, ‘Cijferen in het rekenonderwijs van toen en nu’, Pedagogische Studiën 59, 97–116.Google Scholar
- Treffers, A.: 1982b, ‘Basisalgoritmen in het wiskunde-onderwijs op de basisschool’, Pedagogische Studiën 59, 471–484.Google Scholar
- Treffers, A.: 1987, Three Dimensions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Veldhuis, E. C.: 1981, Deelleergang cijferend optellen en aftrekken volgens het principe van progressieve schematisering gegeven in het kader van remedial teaching van vier kinderen in het buitengewoon onderwijs, IPAW, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Vink, H.: 1978, Algoritmen mel kruispunten en eieren. Leerpsychologische verkenningen en een onderzoek naar het leerresultaat en het hanteren van een algoritme-leergang vermenigvuldigen in het derde leerjaar van de basisschool, IPAW, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Vrolijk, A.: 1981, Algoritmen in het onderwijs, IPAW, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987