Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 264, Issue 2, pp 293–298 | Cite as

Quantitative analysis of regional variability in the distribution of transverse tubules in rabbit myocardium

  • James G. Tidball
  • Jane E. Cederdahl
  • Donald M. Bers
Article
Accepted:

Summary

The goal of the present investigation was to compare quantitatively the distribution of T-tubules between regions of the myocardium. The volume fraction and surface density of T-tubules in rabbit right atrial free wall, left atrial free wall, right ventricular free wall, left ventricular free wall, right ventricular papillary muscle, and left ventricular papillary muscle were measured using established, electron-microscopic, morphometric techniques. T-tubules were delineated using wheat-germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as a tracer. No significant differences were found in the morphometric parameters between any two ventricular samples or between atrial samples. Furthermore, little difference between T-tubule volume fraction or surface density was found between individual animals for any given site. Both volume fraction and surface density of ventricular T-tubules were more than ten-times their values in atrial tissue (volume fraction: 3.43%±0.35 vs. 0.20±0.09; surface density: 2.46 μm2/μm3±0.11 vs 0.10±0.04). Measurements show that there is greater variation of T-tubule volume fraction and surface density within atrial samples than within ventricular samples. This suggests greater inhomogeneity in T-tubule distribution in atrial myocardium than in ventricular myocardium. Morphometric data also indicate that the mean diameter of atrial T-tubules is greater than that of ventricular T-tubules while qualitative observations show that atrial T-tubules are distributed less regularly and have a larger longitudinal component to their organization than those in the ventricular myocardium.

Key words

Transverse (T-) tubules Muscle, cardiac Electron microscopy Morphometry Rabbit (Lagomorpha) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almers W, Fink R, Palade PT (1981) Calcium depletion in frog muscle tubules: the decline of calcium current under maintained depolarization. J Physiol 312:177–207Google Scholar
  2. Ayettey AS, Navaratnam V, Yates RD (1988) Ultrastructure of the internodal myocardium in the rat. J Anat 158:77–90Google Scholar
  3. Bossen EH, Sommer JR, Waugh RA (1978) Comparative stereology of the mouse and finch left ventricle. Tissue Cell 10:773–784Google Scholar
  4. Bossen EH, Sommer JR, Waugh RA (1981) Comparative stereology of mouse atria. Tissue Cell 13:71–77Google Scholar
  5. Fawcett DW, McNutt NS (1969) The ultrastructure of the cat myocardium. I. Ventricular papillary muscle. J Cell Biol 42:1–45Google Scholar
  6. Forbes MS, Sperelakis N (1984) Ultrastructure of mammalian cardiac muscle. In: Sperelakis N (ed) Physiology and pathophysiology of the heart. Nijhoff, Boston The Hague, pp 3–42Google Scholar
  7. Forbes MS, Van Neil EE (1988) Membrane systems of guinea pig myocardium: Ultrastructure and morphometric studies. Anat Rec 222:362–379Google Scholar
  8. Forssmann WG, Girardier L (1970) A study of the T system in rat heart. J Cell Biol 44:1–19Google Scholar
  9. Huxley HE (1964) Evidence for continuity between the central elements of the triads and the extracellular space in frog sartorius muscle. Nature 202:1067–1071Google Scholar
  10. Krüger P (1952) Tetanus and Tonus der quergestreiften Skelettmuskeln der Wirbeltiere und des Menschen. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  11. Lai FA, Anderson K, Rousseau E, Liu QY, Meissner G (1988) Evidence for a Ca2+ channel within the ryanodine receptor complex from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 151:441–449Google Scholar
  12. McNutt NS, Fawcett DW (1969) The ultrastructure of the cat myocardium. II. Atrial muscle. J Cell Biol 42:46–67Google Scholar
  13. Page SG (1969) Structure and some contractile properties of fast and slow muscle of the chicken. J Physiol 205:131–145Google Scholar
  14. Page E, McCallister LP (1973) Studies on the intercalated disk of rat left ventricular myocardial cells. J Ultrastruct Res 43:388–411Google Scholar
  15. Page E, McCallister LP, Power B (1971) Stereological measurements of cardiac ultrastructures implicated in excitation-contraction coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1464–1466Google Scholar
  16. Page E, Earley J, Power B (1974) Normal growth of ultrastructures in rat left ventricular myocardial cells. Circ Res 34 [Suppl]:12–16Google Scholar
  17. Sommer JR, Johnson EA (1979) Ultrastructure of cardiac muscle. In: Berne RM, Sperelakis N, Geiger SR (eds) Handbook of physiology, the cardiovascular system, sect 2, vol 1, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 61–100Google Scholar
  18. Stewart JM, Page EM (1978) Improved stereological techniques for studying myocardial cell growth: Application to external sarcolemma, T system, and intercalated disks of rabbit and rat hearts. J Ultrastruct Res 65:119–134Google Scholar
  19. Tidball JG, Gadus MV (1988) Cytochemical, histological and phylogenetic distribution of a 38,000-dalton protein associated with transverse tubules. J Cell Biochem 38:99–112Google Scholar
  20. Tidball JG, Smith R, Shattock MJ, Bers DM (1988) Differences in action potential configuration in ventricular trabeculae correlate with differences in density of transverse tubule: sarcoplasmic reticulum couplings. J Mol Cardiol 20:539–546Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Tidball
    • 1
  • Jane E. Cederdahl
    • 1
  • Donald M. Bers
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Jerry Lewis Neuromuscular Research CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations