Marine Geophysical Researches

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 607–629 | Cite as

Shallow-water imaging multibeam sonars: A new tool for investigating seafloor processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelf

  • John E. Hughes Clarke
  • Larry A. Mayer
  • David E. Wells
Section I: Data Processing and Enhancement

Abstract

Hydrographic quality bathymetry and quantitative acoustic backscatter data are now being acquired in shallow water on a routine basis using high frequency multibeam sonars. The data provided by these systems produce hitherto unobtainable information about geomorphology and seafloor geologic processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelf.

Before one can use the multibeam data for hydrography or quantitative acoustic backscatter studies, however, it is essential to be able to correct for systematic errors in the data. For bathymetric data, artifacts common to deep-water systems (roll, refraction, positioning) need to be corrected. In addition, the potentially far greater effects of tides, heave, vessel lift/squat, antenna motion and internal time delays become of increasing importance in shallower water. Such artifacts now cause greater errors in hydrographic data quality than bottom detection. Many of these artifacts are a result of imperfect motion sensing, however, new methods such as differential GPS hold great potential for resolving such limitations. For backscatter data, while the system response is well characterised, significant post processing is required to remove residual effects of imaging geometry, gain adjustments and water column effects. With the removal of these system artifacts and the establishment of a calibrated test site in intertidal regions (where the seabed may be intimately examined by eye) one can build up a sediment classification scheme for routine regional seafloor identification.

When properly processed, high frequency multibeam sonar data can provide a view of seafloor geology and geomorphology at resolutions of as little as a few decimetres. Specific applications include quantitative estimation of sediment transport rates in large-scale sediment waves, volume effects of iceberg scouring, extent and style of seafloor mass-wasting and delineation of structural trends in bedrock. In addition, the imagery potentially provides a means of quantitative classification of seafloor lithology, allowing sedimentologists the ability to examine spatial distributions of seabed sediment type without resorting to subjective estimation or prohibitively expensive bottom-sampling programs. Using Simrad EM100 and EM1000 sonars as an example, this paper illustrates the nature and scale of possible artifacts, the necessary post-processing steps and shows specific applications of these sonars.

Key words

Multibeam sediment classification seabed backscatter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abidin, H. Z., 1993, On-the-Fly Ambiguity Resolution: State of the Art, Prospects, and Limitations. Collected Papers of DSNS 93, Second International Symposium on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29 March–2 April, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  2. BeldersonR. H., KenyonN. H., StrideA. H. B. and StubbsA. R., 1972, Sonargraphs of the Seafloor: Elsevier Publishing Co. Amsterdam, London, New York.Google Scholar
  3. CloetR. L., HurstS. L., EdwardsC. R., PhillipsP. S. and DuncanA. J., 1982, A Sideways-Looking Towed Depth-Measuring System. Journal of Navigation, 35, 411–420.Google Scholar
  4. DeLoach, S. R., Frodge, S. L. and Remondi, B. W., 1993, Assessment of GPS Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution on-the-Fly. Collected Papers of DSNS 93, Second International Symposium on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29 March–2 April, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  5. deMoustierC. and KleinrockM. C., 1986, Bathymetric Artifacts in Sea Beam Data: How to Recognize. Them, What Causes Them. Journal of Geophysical Research 91 (B3), 3407–3424.Google Scholar
  6. DesnoesY., 1980, Off-Line Contouring of the Data From the Multibeam Sea Beam. International Hydrographic Review LVII (1), 55–76.Google Scholar
  7. Edy, C., 1986, Automatic Mapping with Multibeam Echosounder Data. Proceedings of Oceans '86, pp. 229–238.Google Scholar
  8. Fader, G. B. J., 1989, Submersible Observations of Iceburg Furrows and Sand Ridges, Grand Banks of Newfoundland, in Piper, D. J. W. (ed.), Submersible Observations off the East Coast of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Paper 88-20, 27–39.Google Scholar
  9. Fader, G. B. J., Parrott, R. D., Courtney, R., Nichols, B., Pecore, S. S. and Miller, R. O., 1993, A Comparison on Swath Bathymetric Data and Sidescan Sonograms from the Inner Scotian Shelf Off Halifax. Atlantic Geoscience Society Annual Coloquium and Symposia, Program with Abstracts, (abs.), Halifax, February, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, K. et al., 1991, Three-Dimensional Attitude Determination with the Ashtech 3DF 24-Channel GPS Measurement System. Proceedings of The Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  11. FrancoisR. E. and GarrisonG. R., 1982, Sound Absorption Based on Ocean Measurements. Part II: Boric Acid Contribution and Equation for Total Absorption. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72(6), 1879–1890.Google Scholar
  12. Giles, P. S., Courtney, R. C., Piper, D. J. W. and Loncarevic, B. D., 1993, Seafloor Bedrock Geology, Inner Scotian Shelf South of Halifax Interpreted from EM-100 Swath Bathymetry and Magnetics. Atlantic Geoscience Society Annual Coloquium and Symposia, Program with Abstracts, (abs.), Halifax, February, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. Godin, A., Tessier, B., Hally, P. and Hains, D., 1991, Simrad EM1000 and SWATH Vessel Technology: The Perfect Match? Proceedings of Hydro 92, Copenhagen, December.Google Scholar
  14. HammerstadE., LovikA., MindeS., KraneL. and SteinsetM., 1985, Field Performance of the Benigraph High-Resolution Multibeam Seafloor Mapping System. MTS-IEEE Oceans 2, 682–685.Google Scholar
  15. HammerstadE., PohnerF., ParthoitF. and BennettJ., 1992, Field Testing of a New Deep Water Multibeam Echo Sounder, Proceedings, Oceans91, pp. 743–749.Google Scholar
  16. Harre, I. and Meyer, V., 1989, Area Surveying of Shallow Water Zones by Means of a Multibeam Fan-Type Echosounding System. Krupp Atlas Elektronik, Information Document.Google Scholar
  17. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Collins, J., 1992, Global Positioning System, Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, 326 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Hughes ClarkeJ. E., 1993a, Investigation of the Residual Roll Artifact Present in Matthew 92–008 EM100 Data. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, Contract Report No. FP962–2–6001, 48 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes Clarke, J. E., 1993b, The Potential for Seabed Classification Using Backscatter from Shallow Water Multibeam Sonars: Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Acoustic Classification and Mapping of the Seabed, v. 15, pt. 2, pp. 381–388, Bath, U.K., April 1993.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes ClarkeJ. E., 1994, Toward Remote Seafloor Classification Using the Angular Response of Acoustic Backscatter: A Case Study From Multiply Overlapping GLORIA Data. IEEE Oceanic Engineering 19(1), 112–127.Google Scholar
  21. Hughes Clarke, J. E. and Godin, A., 1993, Investigation of the Roll and Heave Errors Present in Frederick G. Creed-EM1000 Data When Using a TSS-335B Motion Sensor. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, Contract Report No. FP707-3-5731, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes Clarke, J. E., Mayer, L. A., Mitchell, N. C., Godin, A. and Costello, G., 1993, Processing and Interpretation of 95 kHz Backscatter Data from Shallow-Water Multibeam Sonars. Proceeding of Oceans '93, Victoria, BC, October, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Herlihy, D., Hillard, B. and Rulon, T., 1989, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seabeam System Patch Test. International Hydrographic Review, pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
  24. IHO, 1987, International Hydrographic Bureau, Monaco, Accuracy Standards, Special Publication #44, 3rd Edition.Google Scholar
  25. Joseph, M., 1991, Assessing the Precision of Depth Data. International Hydrographic Review, Monaco, LXVIII(2), July 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Kavli, T., Carlin, M. and Madsen, R., 1993, Seabed Classification Using Artificial Neural Networks and Other Non-Parametric Methods. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Acoustic Classification and Mapping of the Seabed, v. 15, pt. 2, pp. 141–148, Bath, U.K., April 1993.Google Scholar
  27. LachapelleG., CannonE. and GangLu, 1993, P-Code Versus C/A-Code for Ambiguity Resolution on the Fly, GPS World, February, 4(2), pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
  28. Linnett, L. M., Clarke, S. J., Reid, C. St. J. and Tress, A. D., 1993, Monitoring of the Seabed Using Sidescan Sonar and Fractal Processing. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Acoustic Classification and Mapping of the Seabed, v. 15, pt. 2, pp. 49–64, Bath, U.K., April 1993.Google Scholar
  29. LuG., LachapelleG., CannonM. E. and KiellandP., 1993, Attitude Determination in a Survey Launch Using Multi-Antenna GPS Technology. Presented at The Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, San Francisco, Calif., 20–22 January, The Institute of Navigation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, L. A. and the HYGRO-92 Team, 1993, A Multi-Faceted Acoustic Ground-Truthing Experiment in the Bay of Fundy. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Acoustic Classification and Mapping of the Seabed, v. 15, pt. 2, pp. 203–219, Bath, U.K., April 1993.Google Scholar
  31. McMillanJ. C., 1993, Interferometric GPS Attitude: A Stochastic Error Model. Report No. 1168, Defence Research Establishment Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Z4.Google Scholar
  32. MitchellN. C. and SomersM., 1989, Quantitative Backscatter Measurements with a Long-Range Side-Scan Sonar, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 14, 363–374.Google Scholar
  33. Oldenburg, G., 1987, Honeywell ELAC Bottom Chart, IEEE Oceans 87, Proceedings, pp. 1190–1196.Google Scholar
  34. PaceN. G. and GaoH., 1988, Swathe Seabed Classification. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 13(2), 83–90.Google Scholar
  35. Perry, R. B., 1982, Scientific and Hydrographic Use of the Bathymetric Swath Survey System, Proceedings of Oceans '82 Conference, Washington, DC, pp. 396–401.Google Scholar
  36. PeytonD. R., 1992, The DOLPHIN/EM100 Ocean Mapping System. The Hydrographic Journal 65, 5–9.Google Scholar
  37. Pohner, F., 1986, Multibeam Echo Sounder is Low Cost Seafloor Mapper, Sea Technology, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
  38. Pohner, F. and Lunde, E. B., 1990, Hydrographic Applications of Interferometric Signal Processing. Proceedings of the FIG XIX Congress, Commission 4, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  39. PriorD. B., BornholdB. D. and JohnsM. W., 1986, Active Sand Transport Along a Fjord-Bottom Channel, Bute Inlet, British Columbia. Geology, 14, 581–584.Google Scholar
  40. ReedT. B.IV. and HussongD., 1989, Digital Image Processing Techniques for Enhancement and Classification of Sea MARC II Side Scan Sonar Imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research 94, (B6), 7469–7490.Google Scholar
  41. Schwarz, K. P., El-Mowafy, A. and Wei, M., 1992, Testing a GPS Attitude System in Kinematic Mode. ION GPS-92, Proceedings of Fifth International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Albuquerque, N. Mex., 16–18 September, pp. 801–809.Google Scholar
  42. Simrad, 1992, SIMRAD EM 1000 Hydrographic Echo Sounder, Product Description: Simrad Subsea A/S, Horten, Norway, #P2415EGoogle Scholar
  43. TSS UK Ltd., 1993, Model 335B Roll-Pitch-Heave Sensor, Operating Manual: TSS (UK) Ltd, document part number 402032 (Issue 1.3).Google Scholar
  44. TyceR., FergusonS. and LemmondP., 1988, NECOR Sea Beam Data Collection and Processing Development. Marine Technology Society Journal 21 (2), 80–92.Google Scholar
  45. vanGraasF. and BraaschM. S., 1992, Real-Time Attitude and Heading Determination Using GPS. GPS World, March, 3 (3), 32–39.Google Scholar
  46. WellsD. E., BeckN., DelikaraoglouD., KleusbergA., Krakiwsky, E. J., LachapelleG., LangleyR. B., NakibogluM., SchwarzK. P., TranquillaJ. M. and VanicekP., 1987, Guide to GPS Positioning. Canadian GPS Associates, Fredericton, N.B., 600 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Wheaton, G. E., “Patch Test” A System Check for Multibeam Survey Systems. Third Biennial U.S. Hydrographic Conference, Proceedings, pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
  48. White, D. J., 1971, Bo'Sun, A Multibeam Sonar for Search and Survey, General Instrument Corporation, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 1457.Google Scholar
  49. WilsonG. J. and TonnemacherJ. D., 1992, A GPS Attitude Determination System. The Journal of Navigation (U.K.) 45 (2), 192–204.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Hughes Clarke
    • 1
  • Larry A. Mayer
    • 1
  • David E. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.Ocean Mapping Group, Dept. Geodesy and Geomatics EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations