Advertisement

Zoomorphology

, Volume 109, Issue 2, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Ultrastructure and relationship between protonephridia and metanephridia in Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida)

  • Thomas Bartolomaeus
Article

Summary

The actinotrocha of Phoronis muelleri has one pair of ectodermally derived, monociliated protonephridia. The duct runs mainly between the epidermis and the lining of the hyposphere coelom, pierces the septum and extends into the blastocoel. The proximal part is branched and closed up by terminal complexes consisting of two morphologically different cells which both serve filtration. During metamorphosis, the terminal complexes and the branches of the duct are cast off. The cells degenerate, pass into the remaining duct and are endocytosed by the duct cells. After metamorphosis the remaining part of the protonephridial duct is U-shaped, blindly closed and borders on the prospective lophophoral vessel. In a later stage the duct receives a ciliated funnel, which consists of monociliated epithelio-muscle cells and is a derivative of the lining of the metacoel. Thus, a part of the protonephridial duct of the larva and the whole metanephridial duct of the adult are identical. Aspects of a possible homology between phoronid nephridia and such organs in other bilaterians are discussed.

Keywords

Developmental Biology Proximal Part Duct Cell Terminal Complex Protonephridial Duct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ax P (1987) The phylogenetic system: the systematization of living organisms on the basis of their phylogenetisis. Wiley Sons, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore. 340 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolomaeus Th (1985) Ultrastructure and development of the protonephridia of Lineus viridis (Nemertini). Microfauna Mar 2:61–83Google Scholar
  3. Bartolomaeus Th (1989) Ultrastructure and development of the nephridia in Anaitides mucosa. Zoomorphology 109 (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bargmann W, van Hehn G (1968) Über das Axialorgan (“mysterious gland”) von Asterias rubens. Z Zellforsch 88:262–277Google Scholar
  5. Brandenburg J (1966) Die Reusenformen der Cyrtocyten. Eine Beschreibung von fünf weiteren Reusengeißelzellen und eine vergleichende Betrachtung. Zool Beitr N F 12/3:345–417Google Scholar
  6. Brooks WK, Cowles RP (1905) Phoronis architecta. Its life history, anatomy and breeding habits. Mem Nat Acad Sci Washington 10:69–111Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell WH (1882) On the structure, development and affinities of Phoronis. Proc R Soc London 34:371–383Google Scholar
  8. Cori CI (1939) Phoronidea. Akademische Verlagsges. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehlers U (1985) Das phylogenetische System der Plathelminthes. G Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart New York, 317 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlers U (1986) Comments on a phylogenetic system of the Platyhelminthes. Hydrobiologia 132:1–12Google Scholar
  11. Ehlers U, Sopott-Ehlers B (1986) Vergleichende Ultrastruktur von Protonephridien: ein Beitrag zur Stammesgeschichte der Plathelminthen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 79:168–169Google Scholar
  12. Ehlers U, Sopott-Ehlers B (1987) Zum Protonephridialsystem von Invenusta paracnida (Proseriata, Plathelminthes). Microfauna Mar 3:377–390Google Scholar
  13. Emig CC (1979) British and other phoronids. Synopses of the British fauna (New Series) No. 13. Eds Kermack DM, Barnes RSK, Acad. Press, London, New York, San Francisco. 57 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Emig CC (1982) The biology of Phoronida. Adv Mar Biol 19:1–89Google Scholar
  15. Emig CC (1985) Phylogenetic systematics in Phoronida (Lophophorata). Z Zool Syst Evolut Forsch 23:184–193Google Scholar
  16. Goodrich ES (1903) On the body cavities and nephridia of the Actinotrocha larva. Q J Microsc Sci 47:103–119Google Scholar
  17. Goodrich ES (1946) The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Q J Microsc Sci 86:113–329Google Scholar
  18. Hay-Schmidt A (1987) The ultrastructure of the protonephridium of the actinotroch larva (Phoronida). Acta Zool 68:35–49Google Scholar
  19. Herrmann K (1976) Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Physiologie und Ökologie der Metamorphose von Phoronis mülleri (Phoronida). Zool Jahrb Anat 95:354–376Google Scholar
  20. Holborow PL (1971) The fine structure of the trochophore of Harmothoë imbricata. — In: The fourth european marine biology symposium. Cambridge Univ. Press 1971, p. 237–246Google Scholar
  21. Lammert V (1985) The fine structure of protonephridia in Gnathostomulida and their comparison within Bilateria. Zoomorphology 105:308–316Google Scholar
  22. Masterman AT (1897) On the Diplochorda. Q J Microsc Sci NS 40:281–366Google Scholar
  23. Meisenheimer J (1909) Die Exkretionsorgane der wirbellosen Tiere. Erg Fortschr Zool 2:275–366Google Scholar
  24. Neuhaus B (1987) Ultrastructure of the protonephridium in Dactylopodola baltica and Mesodasys laticaudatus (Macrodasyoidea): Implications for the ground pattern of the Gastrotricha. Microfauna Mar 3:419–438Google Scholar
  25. Peters W (1977) Possible sites of ultrafiltrationin Tubifex tubifex Müller (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Cell Tissue Res 179:367–375Google Scholar
  26. Rice SA (1980) Ultrastructure of the male nephridium and its role in spermatophore formation in spionid polychaetes (Annelida). Zoomorphology 95:181–194Google Scholar
  27. Ruppert EE, Balser EJ (1986) Nephridia in the larvae of hemichordates and echinoderms. Biol Bull 171:188–196Google Scholar
  28. Ruppert EE, Smith PR (1988) The functional organization of filtration nephridia. Biol Rev 63:231–258Google Scholar
  29. Selys-Longchamps M de (1903) Über Phoronis und Actinotrocha bei Helgoland. Wiss Meeresunters (Abt. Helgoland) 6:1–56Google Scholar
  30. Selys-Longchamps M de (1904) Developpement postembryonaire et affinites des Phoronis. Mem Sci Acad Belg 1:1–150Google Scholar
  31. Selys-Longchamps M de (1907) Phoronis. Fauna Flora Golf Neapel 30:1–280Google Scholar
  32. Shearer C (1906) Development of larval nephridia. I. Phoronis. Mitt Zool Sta Neapel 17:154–187Google Scholar
  33. Smith PR, Ruppert EE (1988) Nephridia. In: The ultrastructure of the Polychaeta. Microfauna Mar 4:231–262Google Scholar
  34. Storch V, Herrmann K (1978) Podocytes in the blood vessels of Phoronis mülleri (Phoronida, Tentaculata). Cell Tissue Res 190:553–556Google Scholar
  35. Warner FD (1969) The fine structure of the protonephridia in the rotifer Asplanchna. J Ultrastruct Res 29:499–524Google Scholar
  36. Wilke U (1972) Die Feinstruktur des Glomerulus von Glassobalanus minutus (Kowalewsky (Enteropneusta). Cytobiol 5:439–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Bartolomaeus
    • 1
  1. 1.II. Zoologisches Institut und MuseumGöttingenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations