Zoomorphology

, Volume 107, Issue 5, pp 261–272 | Cite as

Fine structure of the dorsal arm plate of Ophiocoma wendti: Evidence for a photoreceptor system (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea)

  • Gordon Hendler
  • Maria Byrne
Article

Summary

Three structures in the dermis of the dorsal arm plate (DAP) of the brittlestar, Ophiocoma wendti, appear to comprise a photoreceptor system. The upper surface of the DAP bears transparent, knob-like, microscopic structures which are expanded peripheral trabeculae (EPT) of the calcite stereom. The EPT are part of the photoreceptor system and can facilitate light transmission through the DAP by decreasing light refraction, reflection and absorption that occur at stereom/stroma interfaces. Bundles of nerve fibres located below the EPT are a second component of the system, and may function as primary photoreceptors. The intensity of light impinging on the putative sensory tissue is regulated by the diurnal activity cycle of chromatophores, the third element of the system. During the day the chromatophores cover the EPT and thereby shade the nerve fibres. At night they retract into inter-trabecular channels, uncovering the EPT and thereby exposing the nerve fibres to transmitted light. Thus, the transparent stereom may play a role in photoreception, in addition to its generally recognized skeletal function. Although ciliated cells that may be sensory are present in the epidermis of Ophiocoma wendti, they do not appear to be photoreceptors. Functional analogues of the brittlestar photoreceptor system in other echinoderms are discussed, emphasizing the relationship between photosensitivity and the transparency of the stereom in several classes of Echinodermata.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berrios A, Brink D, del Castillo J, Smith DS (1985) Some properties of the action potentials conducted in the spines of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 81:15–23Google Scholar
  2. Brehm P (1977) Electrophysiology and luminescence of an ophiuroid radial nerve. J Exp Biol 71:213–227Google Scholar
  3. Byrne M (1983) Evisceration and autotomy in the holothurian, Eupentacta quinquesemita (Selenka), Ph. D. Thesis. University of VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb JLS (1985) The neurobiology of the ectoneural/hyponeural synaptic connection in an echinoderm. Biol Bull 168:432–446Google Scholar
  5. Cobb JLS, Moore A (1986) Comparative studies on the receptor structure in the brittlestar Ophiura ophiura. J Neurocytol 15:97–108Google Scholar
  6. Cobb JLS, Stubbs TR (1982) The giant neurone system in ophiuroids: III. The detailed connections of the circumoral nerve ring. Cell Tissue Res 226:675–687Google Scholar
  7. Dambach M, Weber W (1975) Inhibition of pigment movement by cytochalasin B in the chromatophores of the sea urchin Centrostephanus longispinus. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 50:49–52Google Scholar
  8. Dietrich HF, Fontaine AR (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissues. Stain Technol 50:351–354Google Scholar
  9. Döderlein L (1898) Ueber “Krystallköper” bei Seesternen. Denkschr Med Nat Ges Jena 8:491–494Google Scholar
  10. Donnay G, Pawson DL (1969) X-ray diffraction studies of echinoderm plates. Science 166:1147–1150Google Scholar
  11. Eakin R, Brandenberger JL (1979) Effects of light on ocelli of seastars. Zoomorphologie 92:191–200Google Scholar
  12. Gibson AW, Burke RD (1985) The origin of pigment cells in embryos of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol 107:414–419Google Scholar
  13. Gras H, Weber W (1983) Light-induced alterations in cell shape and pigment displacement in chromatophores of the sea urchin Centrostephanus longispinus. Cell Tissue Res 182:165–176Google Scholar
  14. Hendler G (1984a) Brittlestar color-change and phototaxis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Ophiocomidae). PSZNI Mar Ecol 5:379–401Google Scholar
  15. Hendler G (1984b) The association of Ophiothrix lineata and Callyspongia vaginalis: A brittlestar-sponge cleaning symbiosis? PSZNI Mar Ecol 5:9–27Google Scholar
  16. Holland ND (1984) Echinodermata: epidermal cells. In: Bereiter-Hahn J (ed) Biology of the integument, vol 1. Invertebrates. Springer, Berlin, pp 756–774Google Scholar
  17. Märkel K, Röser U (1985) Comparative morphology of echinoderm calcified tissues: histology and ultrastructure of ophiuroid scales (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea). Zoomorphology 105:197–207Google Scholar
  18. Martinez JL (1977a) Ultrasestructura del tejido nervioso podial de Ophiothrix fragilis. Bol R Soc Esp Hist Nat Sec Biol 75:315–333Google Scholar
  19. Martinez JL (1977b) Estructura y ultraestructura del epithelio de los podios de Ophiothrix fragilis (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea). Bol R Soc Esp Hist Nat Sec Biol 75:275–301Google Scholar
  20. McFarland WN (1986) Light in the sea — correlations with behaviors of fishes and invertebrates. Am Zool 26:389–401Google Scholar
  21. Millott N (1975) The photosensitivity of echinoids. Adv Mar Biol 13:1–52Google Scholar
  22. Millott N, Coleman R (1969) The podial pit — a new structure in the echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi. Z Zellforsch 95:187–197Google Scholar
  23. Moore A (1985) Neurophysiological studies on the perception of environmental stimuli in Ophiura ophiura (L.) (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea). In: Keegan BF, O'Connor BDS (eds) Echinodermata: proceedings of the 5th International Echinoderm Conference, Galway. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 627–631Google Scholar
  24. Moore A, Cobb JLS (1985) Neurophysiological studies on photic responses in Ophiura ophiura. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 80:11–16Google Scholar
  25. Pentreath VW, Cobb JLS (1972) Neurobiology of Echinodermata. Biol Rev 47:363–392Google Scholar
  26. Pentreath VW, Cobb JLS (1982) Echinodermata. In: Shelton GAB (ed) Electrical conduction and behaviour in ‘simple’ invertebrates. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 440–472Google Scholar
  27. Raup DM (1960) Ontogenetic variation in the crystallography of echinoid calcite. J Paleontology 34:1041–1050Google Scholar
  28. Raup DM (1966) The endoskeleton. In: Boolootian RA (ed) Physiology of Echinodermata. Interscience, New York, pp 379–395Google Scholar
  29. Robles LJ, Breneman JW, Anderson EO, Nottoli VA, Kegler LR (1986) Immunocytochemical localization of a rhodopsin-like protein in the lipochondria in photosensitive neurons of Aplysia californica. Cell Tissue Res 244:115–120Google Scholar
  30. Ryberg E, Lundgren B (1979) Some aspects on pigment cell distribution and function in the developing echinopluteus of Psammechinus miliaris. Dev Growth Differ 21:129–140Google Scholar
  31. Smith AB (1980) Stereom microstructure of the echinoid test: special papers in paleontology No 25. Paleont Assoc, London, pp 1–81Google Scholar
  32. Stubbs TR (1982) The neurophysiology of photosensitivity in ophiuroids. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Proceedings, International Echinoderms Conference, Tampa. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 403–408Google Scholar
  33. Takasu N, Yoshida M (1983) Photic effects on photosensory microvilli in the seastar Asterias amurensis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Zoomorphology 103:135–148Google Scholar
  34. Weber W (1983) Photosensitivity of chromatophores. Am Zool 23:495–506Google Scholar
  35. Weber W, Dambach M (1974) Light-sensitivity of isolated pigment cells of the sea urchin Centrostephanus longispinus. Cell Tissue Res 148:437–440Google Scholar
  36. Weber W, Gras H (1980) Ultrastructural observations on changes in cell shape in chromatophores of the sea urchin Centrostephanus longispinus. Cell Tissue Res 206:21–33Google Scholar
  37. Weber W, Grosmann M (1977) Ultrastructure of the basiepithelial nerve plexus of the sea urchin, Centrostephanus longispinus. Cell Tissue Res 175:551–562Google Scholar
  38. Whitfield PJ, Emson RH (1983) Presumptive ciliated receptors associated with the fibrillar glands of the spines of the echinoderm Amphipholis squamata. Cell Tissue Res 232:609–624Google Scholar
  39. Wilkie IC (1979) The juxtaligamental cells of Ophiocomina nigra (Abildgaard) (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) and their possible role in mechano-effector function of collagenous tissue. Cell Tissue Res 197:515–530Google Scholar
  40. Yoshida M (1966) Photosensitivity. In: Boolootian RA (ed) Physiology of Echinodermata. Interscience, New York, pp 379–395Google Scholar
  41. Yoshida M (1979) Extraocular photoreception. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6A. Springer, Berlin, pp 581–640Google Scholar
  42. Yoshida M, Takasu N, Tomatsu S (1984) Photoreception in echinoderms. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum, New York, pp 743–771Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon Hendler
    • 1
  • Maria Byrne
    • 2
  1. 1.Life Sciences, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles CountyLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Zoology DepartmentUniversity College GalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations