Physics and Chemistry of Minerals

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 271–286 | Cite as

Deformation of dolomite single crystals from 20–800° C

  • D. J. Barber
  • H. C. Heard
  • H. R. Wenk
Article

Abstract

Dolomite single crystals of six different crystallographic orientations were tested in compression under confining pressure at temperatures of 20 to 800° C. The chosen orientations favoured slip or twinning on particular systems. The deformed crystals were analysed by optical and high voltage transmission electron microscopy to determine activated deformation systems, dislocation behaviour, etc., and to assist in interpreting stress-strain data. It is shown that slip on c≡(0001) and on \(f \equiv (\bar 1012)\)), and twinning on f between 300 and 600° C, are the principal modes of deformation. At low temperatures there is considerable cataclasis, and shear-fracturing must be counted as a significant deformation mechanism. The effects of climb become apparent at temperatures ≳600° C.

A pronounced increase in strength with testing temperature shown by some orientations of the crystals is largely associated with c slip, but f twinning also shows similar although weaker tendencies. The yield stress for f slip decreases markedly with temperature. Values of critical resolved shear stress are obtained for c and f slip, and for f twinning. Major and minor slip systems, dislocation and twin configurations generated by deformation under different regimes are documented and illustrated. Some of the characteristics of the deformation systems are attributed to the details of atomic displacements. In particular, the increase in strength with temperature for c slip is explained by friction of CO 3 2− groups during dislocation movement, which is unique for c slip. This friction increases with thermal vibration, expansion and rotation of the CO 3 2− groups.

Keywords

Slip System Dislocation Behaviour Crystallographic Orientation Atomic Displacement Resolve Shear Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ardley GW (1955) On the effect of ordering upon the strength of Cu3Au. Acta Metall 3:525–532Google Scholar
  2. Barber DJ (1977) Defect microstructures in deformed and recovered dolomite. Tectonophysics 39:193–213Google Scholar
  3. Barber DJ, Heard HC, Paterson MS, Wenk HR (1977) Stacking faults in dolomite. Nature 269:789–790Google Scholar
  4. Barber DJ, Wenk HR (1979) Deformation twinning in calcite, dolomite, and other rhombohedral carbonates. Phys Chem Minerals 5:141–165Google Scholar
  5. Beruto D, Searcy AW (1976) Calcium oxides of high reactivity. Nature 263:221–222Google Scholar
  6. Buerger MJ (1930) Translation gliding in crystals of the NaCl structural type. Am Mineral 15:174–187; 226–237Google Scholar
  7. Cahn RW, Coll JA (1961) Twinning in iron-aluminum alloys. Acta Metall 9:138–148Google Scholar
  8. Davies RG, Stoloff NS (1965) On the yield stress of aged Ni-Al alloys. Trans Metall Soc AIME 233:714–719Google Scholar
  9. Donnay JDH (1947) Hexagonal four-index symbols. Am Mineral 32:52–58Google Scholar
  10. Dove HW (1860) Optische Notizen. Ann Phys 110:286–290Google Scholar
  11. Fairbairn HW, Hawkes NE (1941) Dolomite orientation in deformed rocks. Am J Sci 239:617–632Google Scholar
  12. Graf DL, Goldsmith JR (1955) Dolomite-magnesian calcite relations at elevated temperatures and CO2 pressures. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 7:109–128Google Scholar
  13. Griggs DT, Turner FJ, Heard HC (1960) Deformation of rocks at 500° C–800° C. In: Griggs DT, Handin J (eds) Rock deformation Mem. 79. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado pp 39–104Google Scholar
  14. Handin JW, Fairbairn HW (1953) Experimental deformation of Hasmark dolomite. Geol Soc Am Bull 64:1429–1430Google Scholar
  15. Handin JW, Fairbairn HW (1955) Experimental deformation of Hasmark dolomite. Geol Soc Am Bull 66:1257–1274Google Scholar
  16. Handin JW, Heard HC, Magovirk JN (1967) Effects of the intermediate principal stress on the failure of limestone, dolomite and glass at different temperatures and strain rates. J Geophys Res 72:611–640Google Scholar
  17. Heard HC, Turner FJ, Weiss LE (1965) Deformation in calcite crystals at different strain rates in studies of heterogeneous strain in experimentally deformed calcite, marble and phyllite. Geol Sci 46:81–152Google Scholar
  18. Heard HC, Carter NL (1968) Experimentally induced “natural” intra-granular flow in quartz and quartzite. Am J Sci 266:1–42Google Scholar
  19. Heard HC (1976) Comparison of the flow properties of rocks at crustal conditions. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 283:173–186Google Scholar
  20. Heard HC, Raleigh CB (1972) Steady state flow in marble at 500–800° C. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:935–956Google Scholar
  21. Higgs DV, Handin JW (1959) Experimental deformation of dolomite single crystals. Geol Soc Am Bull 70:245–278Google Scholar
  22. Johnsen A (1902) Biegungen and Translationen. Neues Jahrb Mineral Geol Paleontol Monatsh Abt 2:133–153Google Scholar
  23. Karduck P, Gittstein C, Mecking H (1978) Development of dislocation structure and orientation gradients in kink bands. In: Textures of materials, vol 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 377–386Google Scholar
  24. Lawley A, Vidoz EA, Cahn RW (1961) The dependence of the flow stress of Fe3Al on crystallographic order. Acta Metall 9:287–296Google Scholar
  25. Mader S, Seeger A (1960) Untersuchung des Gleitlinienbildes Kubischflächenzentrierter Einkristalle. Acta Metall 8:513–522Google Scholar
  26. Marcinkowski MJ, Sadananda K, Taunt RJ (1974) The effect of stacking fault energy on the mutual cross-slip of unlike dislocations. I. Coalescence mode. Acta Metall 22:1405–1413Google Scholar
  27. Müller H (1931) The influence of the electric polarizability on the gliding strength of crystals. Am Mineral 16:237–249Google Scholar
  28. Neumann ER (1969) Experimental recrystallization of dolomite and comparisons of preferred orientations of calcite and dolomite in deformed rocks. J Geol 77:426–438Google Scholar
  29. Paterson MS, Weiss LE (1966) Experimental deformation and folding in phyllite. Geol Soc Am Bull 77:343–373Google Scholar
  30. Paterson MS (1969) The ductility of rocks. In: Argon AS (ed) Physics of strength and plasticity. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, pp 377–392Google Scholar
  31. Paterson MS (1979) Deformation mechanisms in carbonate crystals. In: Borland DW, Clarebrough LM, Moore AJW (eds) Phys Materials. Univ. Melbourne, pp 199–208Google Scholar
  32. Pfaff F (1859) Versuche über den Einfluss des Drucks auf die optischen Eigenschaften doppeltbrechender Krystalle. Ann Phys 107:333–338Google Scholar
  33. Pilger A (1979) Beiträge zur Geologie und Paläontologie des Paläozoikums der Spanischen Westpyrenäen. Clausthaler Geol Abh 12:95Google Scholar
  34. Reeder RJ (1980) Phase transformations in dolomite. Ph.D. thesis, Univ Calif, Berkeley, p 159Google Scholar
  35. Stoloff NS, Davies RG (1964) The effect of ordering on the plastic deformation of Mg3Cd. Trans Am Soc Met 57:247–260Google Scholar
  36. Towe KM (1978) Ultrastructure of calcite decomposition in vacuo. Nature 274:239–240Google Scholar
  37. Trommsdorff V, Wenk HR (1965) Die Regelung des Dolomites von Crevola (Simplongruppe) Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 45:551–568Google Scholar
  38. Tschermak G (1881) Ueber die Isomorphie der rhomboedrischen Karbonate etc. Tschermaks Mineral Petrogr Mitt (Neue Folge) 4:99–121Google Scholar
  39. Turner FJ, Griggs DT, Heard H (1954a) Experimental deformation of calcite crystals. Geol Soc Am Bull 65:883–934Google Scholar
  40. Turner FJ, Griggs DT, Heard H, Weiss LE (1954b) Plastic deformation of dolomite rock at 380° C. Am J Sci 252:477–488Google Scholar
  41. Turner FJ, Orozco M (1976) Crystal bending in metamorphic calcite and its relation to associated twinning. Contrib Mineral Petrol 57:83–97Google Scholar
  42. von Mises R (1928) Mechanik der plastischen Formänderung von Kristallen. Angew Math Mech 8:161–185Google Scholar
  43. Weber L (1922) Das viergliedrige Zonensymbol des hexagonalen Systems, Z Kristallogr 57:200–203Google Scholar
  44. Weiss LE, Turner FJ (1972) Some observations of translation gliding and kinking in experimentally deformed calcite and dolomite. In: Heard HC, Borg IY, Carter NL, Raleigh CB (eds) Flow and fracture of rocks, the Griggs volume, Am Geophys Union, Washington D.C., p 352Google Scholar
  45. Wenk HR, Shore J (1975) Preferred orientation in experimentally deformed dolomite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 52:115–126Google Scholar
  46. White JC, White SH (1980) High-voltage transmission electron microscopy of naturally deformed polycrystalline dolomite. Tectonophysics 66:35–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Barber
    • 1
  • H. C. Heard
    • 2
  • H. R. Wenk
    • 3
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of EssexColchesterEngland
  2. 2.Lawrence Livermore LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaLivermoreU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations