Physics and Chemistry of Minerals

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 69–78 | Cite as

High-pressure crystal chemistry of phenakite (Be2SiO4) and bertrandite (Be4Si2O7(OH)2)

  • Robert M. Hazen
  • Andrew Y. Au
Article

Abstract

Compressibilities and high-pressure crystal structures have been determined by X-ray methods at several pressures for phenakite and bertrandite. Phenakite (hexagonal, space group R\(\bar 3\)) has nearly isotropic compressibility with β=1.60±0.03×10−4 kbar−1 and β=1.45±0.07×10−4 kbar−1. The bulk modulus and its pressure derivative, based on a second-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state, are 2.01±0.08 Mbar and 2±4, respectively. Bertrandite (orthorhombic, space group Cmc21) has anisotropic compression, with βa=3.61±0.08, βb=5.78±0.13 and βc=3.19±0.01 (all ×10−4 kbar−1). The bulk modulus and its pressure derivative are calculated to be 0.70±0.03 Mbar and 5.3±1.5, respectively.

Both minerals are composed of frameworks of beryllium and silicon tetrahedra, all of which have tetrahedral bulk moduli of approximately 2 Mbar. The significant differences in linear compressibilities of the two structures are a consequence of different degrees of T-O-T bending.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton MD (1986) Phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties of minerals in the BeO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O (BASH) system, with petrologic applications. Am Mineral 71:in pressGoogle Scholar
  2. Downs JW (1983) An experimental examination of the electron distribution in bromellite, BeO, and phenacite, Be2SIO4. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamilton WC (1974) Angle settings for four-circle diffractometers. In: International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol 4. Kynoch Press, Birmingham, England, pp 273–284Google Scholar
  4. Hazen RM (1985) Comparative crystal chemistry and the polyhedral approach. Rev Mineral 14:317–346Google Scholar
  5. Hazen RM, Finger LW (1979) Bulk modulus-volume relationship for cation-anion polyhedra. J Geophys Res 84:6723–6728Google Scholar
  6. Hazen RM, Finger LW (1982) Comparative Crystal Chemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hazen RM, Finger LW (1985) Crystals at high pressure. Sci Am 252:110–117Google Scholar
  8. Jorgensen JD (1978) Compression mechanisms in α-quartz structures — SiO2 and GeO2. J Appl Phys 49:5473–5478Google Scholar
  9. King HE, Finger LW (1979) Diffracted beam crystal centering and its application to high-pressure crystallography. J Appl Crystallogr 12:374–378Google Scholar
  10. Lehmann MS, Larsen FK (1974) A method for location of the peaks in step-scan-measured Bragg reflections. Acta Crystallogr A30:580–584Google Scholar
  11. Levien L, Prewitt CT (1981) High-pressure crystal structure and compressibility of coesite. Am Mineral 66:324–333Google Scholar
  12. Levien L, Prewitt CT, Weidner DJ (1980) Structure and elastic properties of quartz at pressure. Am Mineral 65:920–930Google Scholar
  13. Robinson K, Gibbs GV, Ribbe PH (1971) Quadratic elongation: a quantitative measure of distortion in coordination polyhedra. Science 172:567–570Google Scholar
  14. Simonov MA, Belov NV (1976) Crystal structures of bertrandite Be4[Si2O7](OH)2 and hemimorphite (calamine) Zn4[Si2O7](OH)2H2O. Sov Phys Dolk 21:607–608Google Scholar
  15. Solov'eva LP, Belov NV (1965) Precise determination of the crystal structure of bertrandite Be4[Si2O7](OH)2. Sov Phys Crystallogr 9:458–460Google Scholar
  16. Zachariasen WH (1967) A general theory of X-ray diffraction in crystals. Acta Crystallogr 23:558–564Google Scholar
  17. Zachariasen WH (1972) Refined crystal structure of phenacite Be2SiO4. Sov Phys Crystallogr 16:1021–1025Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Hazen
    • 1
  • Andrew Y. Au
    • 1
  1. 1.Geophysical LaboratoryCarnegie Institution of WashingtonWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations