Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 73–76 | Cite as

Is there a “sound window” for primate communication?

  • Peter M. Waser
  • Charles H. Brown
Article

Summary

It has long been asserted that habitat acoustics can determine the frequency band bestadapted for long-range communication, but the generality and validity of measurements claiming to demonstrate a “window” of best frequencies have recently been questioned. We report the discovery of a prominent sound window in Kenyan rain forest in a study that is free of methodological difficulties. Our results allow us to calculate the range advantage attained by an animal vocalizing within the sound window, and show that sound windows can be a potent factor for the evolution of primate communication.

Keywords

Frequency Band Rain Forest Potent Factor Good Frequency Methodological Difficulty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aylor D (1971) Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J Acoust Soc Am 51:197–205Google Scholar
  2. Bowman RI (1979) Adaptive morphology of sound dialects in Darwin's finches. J Ornithol 120:353–389Google Scholar
  3. Brenowitz EA (1982) The active space of red-winged blackbird song. J Comp Physiol 147:514–522Google Scholar
  4. Brown CH, Schwagmeyer PL (in press) The vocal range of alarm calls in thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Z TierpsycholGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown CH, Waser PM (in press) Hearing and communication in blue monkeys. Anim BehavGoogle Scholar
  6. Embleton TFW (1963) Sound propagation in homogeneous deciduous and evergreen woods. J Acoust Soc Am 35:1119–1125Google Scholar
  7. Eyring C (1946) Jungle acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 18:257–270Google Scholar
  8. Gautier JP (1971) Emissions sonores d'espacement et de ralliement par deux cercopitheques arboricoles. Biol Gabonica 7:229–267Google Scholar
  9. Gautier JP, Gautier A (1977) Communication in old world monkeys. In: Sebeok TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 890–964Google Scholar
  10. Marler P (1973) A comparison of vocalizations of red-tailed monkeys and blue monkeys, Cercopithecus ascanius and C. mitis in Uganda. Z Tierpsychol 33:223–247Google Scholar
  11. Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal communication: temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290Google Scholar
  12. Marten K, Quine D, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significane for animal communication: tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:291–302Google Scholar
  13. Michelsen A (1978) Sound reception in different environments. In: Ali BA (ed) Perspectives in sensory ecology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 345–373Google Scholar
  14. Morton E (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34Google Scholar
  15. Oates JF, Trocco T (1982) Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of black-and-white colobus monkeys: the implications of loud calls. Folia Primatol 40:83–113Google Scholar
  16. Piercy JE, Embleton TFW, Sutherland LC (1977) Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. J Acoust Soc Am 61:1403–1418Google Scholar
  17. Roberts J, Kacelnik A, Hunter MJ (1979) A model of sound interference in relation to acoustic communication. Anim Behav 27:1271–1273Google Scholar
  18. Skudrzyk E (1971) The foundations of acoustics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Waser PM (1982) The evolution of male loud calls among mangabeys and baboons. In: Snowdon C, Brown C, Petersen M (eds) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 117–143Google Scholar
  20. Waser PM, Waser MS (1977) Experiment studies of primate vocalization: Specializations for long distance propagation. Z Tierpsychol 43:239–263Google Scholar
  21. Wiener FM, Keast PN (1959) Experimental study of propagation of sound over ground. J Acoust Soc Am 31:724–733Google Scholar
  22. Wiley RH, Richards J (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94Google Scholar
  23. Wiley RH, Richards J (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DH, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter M. Waser
    • 1
  • Charles H. Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations