Ultrastructural changes during early development of retinal ganglion cells in Xenopus

  • Steven Fisher
  • Marcus Jacobson
Article
Received:

Summary

All cells in the optic vesicle of Xenopus embryos from stages 27 to 31 have the same ultrastructure. They are elongated and appear to extend from the internal to the external surfaces of the optic vesicle. They are bound together by terminal bars at the internal (lumen) margin, have microvilli and a cilium on the internal margin, and are covered with a basement membrane on the external margin. Their cytoplasm contains abundant free ribosomes, polysomes, mitochondria, yolk and lipid inclusions, and sparse endoplasmic reticulum.

Although other studies have shown that retinal ganglion cells originate at stages 29–30 and have their central connections determined before stage 31, these events could not be correlated with any ultrastructural changes. The first sign of differentiation in retinal cells was an increase in endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus at stage 32. Microtubules and microfilaments appeared at stage 33 in association with the first axonal outgrowth from retinal ganglion cells. Cytodifferentiation proceeded gradually until large areas of Nissl substance had developed by stage 35. At larval stage 48 the ganglion cells resembled those in the adult.

Key-Words

Development Neurons Retina Xenopus 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behnke, O.: Cytoplasmic microtubules in vertebrate cells. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 12, 241 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. Bellairs, R.: The development of the nervous system in chick embryos, studied by electron microscopy. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 7, 94–115 (1959).Google Scholar
  3. Del Cerro, M. P., Snider, R. S., Oster, M. L.: Evolution of the extracellular space in immature neurons. Bxperientia (Basel) 24, 929–930 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. Dowling, J.: Synaptic organization of the frog retina: An electron microscopic analysis comparing the retinas of frogs and primates. Proc. roy. Soc. B 170, 205–228 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. Droz, B.: Protein metabolism in nerve cells. Int. Rev. Cytol. 25, 363–390 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Eschner, J., Glees, P.: Free and membrane-bound ribosomes in maturing neurons of the chick and their possible functional significance. Experientia (Basel) 19, 301–303 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. Freed, J. J., Bhisey, A. N., Lebowitz, M. M.: The relation of microtubules and microfilaments to the motility of cultured cells. J. Cell Biol. 39, 46–47a (1968).Google Scholar
  8. Fujita, H., Fujita, S.: Electron microscopic studies on neuroblast differentiation in the central nervous system of the domestic fowl. Z. Zellforsch. 60, 433–478 (1963).Google Scholar
  9. Fujita, S.: The matrix cell and cytogenesis of the developing CNS. J. comp. Neurol. 120, 37–42 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. —: Application of light and electron microscopy autoradiography to the study of cytogenesis of the forebrain. In: Evolution of the forebrain, edit. by R. Hassler and H. Stephan. New York: Plenum Press 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Gaze, R. M., Peters, A.: The development, structure, and composition of the optic nerve of Xenopus laevis au (Daudin). Quart. J. exp. Physiol. 46, 299–309 (1961).Google Scholar
  12. Herman, L., Kauffman, S. L.: The fine structure of the embryonic mouse neural tube with special reference to cytoplasmic microtubules. Develop. Biol. 13, 145–162 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. Jacobson, M.: Retinal ganglion cells: Specification of central connection in larval Xenopus laevis. Science 155, 1106–1108 (1967).Google Scholar
  14. —: Cessation of DNA synthesis in retinal ganglion cells correlated with the time of specification of their central connections. Develop. Biol. 17, 219–232 (1968a).Google Scholar
  15. —: Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. Develop. Biol. 17, 202–218 (1968b).Google Scholar
  16. Karlsson, U.: Observations on the postnatal development of neuronal structures in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat by electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 17, 158–175 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. Lyser, K.: Early differentiation of motor neuroblasts in the chick embryo as studied by electron microscopy. II. Microtubules and neurofilaments. Develop. Biol. 17, 117–142 (1968).Google Scholar
  18. Meller, K., Glees, P.: Early differentiation in the cerebral hemisphere of mice. An electron microscopical study. Z. Zellforsch. 72, 525–533 (1966).Google Scholar
  19. Millonig, G.: A modified procedure for lead staining of thin sections. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 11, 736–739 (1961).Google Scholar
  20. Mugnaini, E., Forströnen, P. F.: Ultrastructural studies on cerebellar histogenesis. I. Differentiation of granule cells and development of glomeruli in the chick embryo. Z. Zellforsch. 77, 115–143 (1967).Google Scholar
  21. Nagai, R., Rebhun, L. I.: Cytoplasmic microfilaments in streaming Nitella cells. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 14, 571–589 (1966).Google Scholar
  22. Meuwkoop, P. D., Faber, J.: Normal tables of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North Holland Press 1956.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, K. R.: The ground substance; observations from electron microscopy. In: The cell. vol. II, edit. by J. Brachet and A. Mirsky. New York: Academic Press 1961.Google Scholar
  24. Ramón y Cajal, S.: Studies on vertebrate neurogenesis. 1929. Translated into English by L. Guth. Springfield (Ill.): Ch. C. Thomas 1959.Google Scholar
  25. Reynolds, E. S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).Google Scholar
  26. Sechrist, J. W.: Neurocytogenesis. I. Neurofibrils, neurofilaments, and the terminal mitotic cycle. Amer. J. Anat. 124, 117–134 (1969).Google Scholar
  27. Slautterback, D. B.: Cytoplasmic microtubules. I. Hydra. J. Cell Biol. 18, 367–388 (1963).Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, A. C.: The centriole and microtubules. Amer. Naturalist 99, 267–278 (1965).Google Scholar
  29. Tennyson, V. M.: Electron microscopic study of the developing neuroblast of the dorsal root ganglion of the rabbit embryo. J. comp. Neurol. 124, 267–318 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. Wechsler, W.: Electron microscopy of the differentiation in the developing brain of the chick embryo. In: Evolution of the forebrain. Edit. by R. Hassler and H. Stephan. New York: Plenum Press 1966.Google Scholar
  31. —, Meller, K.: Electron microscopy of neuronal and glial differentiation in the developing brain of the chick. Progr. Brain Res. 26, 93–144 (1967).Google Scholar
  32. Wohlman, A., Allen, R. D.: Structural organization associated with pseudopod extension and contraction during cell locomotion in Difflugia. J. Cell Sci. 3, 105–114 (1968).Google Scholar
  33. Yamada, E.: The fine structure of retina studied with electron microscope. I. The fine structure of frog retina. Kurume med. Jap. 4, 127–147 (1957).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Fisher
    • 1
  • Marcus Jacobson
    • 1
  1. 1.Thomas C. Jenkins Department of BiophysicsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations