Psychological Research

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 3–23 | Cite as

Constant velocity — Not perceived as such

  • Sverker Runeson
Article

Summary

Most students of visual velocity perception implicitly assume that constant velocity is seen as such. This notion was challenged and shown to be inadequate in four experiments. A CRT-generated bright spot moved in a linear path according to different velocity time functions. Observers compared these movements pairwise as to their perceived constancy of velocity, or drew graphs describing perceived velocity along the track. Objects moving with constant velocity appear to move fast in the beginning and suddenly slow down to a much lower velocity. There is also a qualitative difference between the start phase and the rest. To be seen as constant, a movement must start smoothly with a certain acceleration and later level off to a constant velocity (natural motion). Such movements also look slower than others with the same average velocity. The results are taken to imply the existence of a perceptual concept of velocity which includes or presupposes a natural start. Consequences for velocity scaling, acceleration thresholds, and other motion perception studies, as well as relations to eye movements and conceptual problems, are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bloch, H., Bonnet, C.: La perception du mouvement. Ann. psychol. 66, 231–262 (1966)Google Scholar
  2. Bozzi, P.: Le condizioni del movimento “naturale” lungo i piani inclinati. Riv. Psicol. LIII, 337–352 (1959)Google Scholar
  3. Bozzi, P.: Fenomenologia del movimento e dinamica pregalileiana. Aut Aut 64, 1–24 (1961)Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. F.: The visual perception of velocity. Psychol. Forsch. 14, 199–232 (1931)Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, R. L.: Problems in motion perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Lundequistska 1964Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, J. J.: The problem of event perception. Unpublished manuscript 1971Google Scholar
  7. Goldstein, J., Wiener, C.: On some relations between the perception of depth and of movement. J. Psychol. 55, 3–23 (1963)Google Scholar
  8. Gottsdanker, R. M.: The ability of human operators to detect acceleration of target motion. Psychol. Bull. 53, 477–487 (1956)Google Scholar
  9. Gottsdanker, R. M.: How the identification of target acceleration is affected by modes of starting and of ending. Brit. J. Psychol. 52, 155–160 (1961)Google Scholar
  10. Gottsdanker, R. M.: Assessment of motion as influenced by structure of background. Scand. J. Psychol. 3, 122–128 (1962)Google Scholar
  11. Gottsdanker, R. M., Frick, J. W., Lockard, R. B.: Identifying the acceleration of visual targets. Brit. J. Psychol. 52, 31–42 (1961)Google Scholar
  12. Hick, W. E.: The threshold for sudden changes in the velocity of a seen object. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 2, 33–41 (1950)Google Scholar
  13. von Hofsten, C.: Proximal velocity change as a determinant of space perception. Perception and Psychophysics (1974) (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Johansson, G., Configurations in the perception of velocity. Acta psychol. (Amst.) 7, 25–79 (1950)Google Scholar
  15. Johansson, G.: Perceptual overestimation of small motion tracks. Psychol. Beitr. 6, 570–580 (1962)Google Scholar
  16. Johansson, G., Jansson, G.: The perception of free fall. Unpublished manuscript (1967)Google Scholar
  17. Koffka, K.: Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul 1935Google Scholar
  18. Michotte, A.: La préfiguration dans les données sensorielles, de notre conception spontanée du monde physique. In: Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Psychology 1948Google Scholar
  19. Michotte, A.: The perception of causality. London: Methuen 1963Google Scholar
  20. Piaget, J., Feller, Y., McNear, E.: Essais sur la perception des vitesses chez l'enfant et chez l'adulte. Arch. Psychol. 36, 253–327 (1958)Google Scholar
  21. Piaget, J., Weiner, M.: Quelques interférences entre la perception de la vitesse et la causalité perceptive. Arch. Psychol. 36, 236–252 (1958)Google Scholar
  22. Rashbass, C.: The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements. J. Physiol. 159, 326–338 (1961)Google Scholar
  23. Sjöberg, L.: When can the subject be trusted not to think. Scand. J. Psychol. 9, 274–276 (1968)Google Scholar
  24. Southall, J. P. C.: Mirrors, prisms, and lenses. New York: Dover 1964Google Scholar
  25. Svensson, O.: Interrelations and structure of judgments of velocity, time, and displacement in relative movement. Report No. 325. Stockholm: Psychological Laboratory, University of Stockholm, 1971Google Scholar
  26. Wallach, H.: On constancy of visual speed. Psychol. Rev. 46, 541–552 (1939)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sverker Runeson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations