Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 199–212 | Cite as

Visual symmetry recognition by pigeons

  • Juan D. Delius
  • Brigitte Nowak
Article

Summary

Pigeons learned to discriminate a large number of bilateral symmetric and asymmetric visual patterns successively projected on the pecking-key of an operant conditioning chamber. Responses to the positive stimuli were reinforced according to a variable interval schedule. Once acquisition was complete generalization trials, involving sets of new stimuli, were instituted under extinction. The birds classified these novel test stimuli with high accuracy throughout, according to their symmetry or asymmetry. Their performance was not disturbed by sets of test stimuli whose geometrical style differed considerably from the training stimuli. Pigeons were even able to discriminate when only allowed the use of one eye. The generalization series were partly designed to test some classical symmetry recognition theories. None was found to be adequate. Subsidiary experiments suggested that most pigeons have a slight spontaneous preference for asymmetric patterns and that symmetry/asymmetry differences can aid pattern discrimination learning at an early stage. It is concluded that pigeons, much like humans, can discriminate bilaterally symmetric from non-symmetric visual forms in a concept-like, generalizing way. The ontogenetic and phylogenetic development of this competence is considered. A novel symmetry recognition hypothesis based on spatial frequency analysis and neuronal feature-detector considerations is proposed.

Keywords

Test Stimulus Training Stimulus Conditioning Chamber Classical Symmetry Interval Schedule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achim A, Corballis MC (1976) Mirror-image equivalence and the anterior commissure. Neuropsychol 15:475–478Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson J, Campbell FW (1974) The effect of phase on the perception of compound gratings. Vision Res 14:159–162Google Scholar
  3. Attneave F (1955) Symmetry, information and memory for patterns. Am J Psychol 68:209–222Google Scholar
  4. Barlow HB, Reeves BC (1979) The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Res 19:783–793Google Scholar
  5. Bornstein MH, Ferdinandsen K, Gross CG (1981) Perception of symmetry in infancy. Develop Psychol 17:82–86Google Scholar
  6. Corballis MC, Beale IL (1976) The psychology of left and right. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Corballis MC, Roldan CE (1974) On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns. Percept Psychophys 16:136–142Google Scholar
  8. Cowan WM, Adamson L, Powell TPS (1961) An experimental study of the avian visual system. J Anat 95:545–563Google Scholar
  9. Cuénod M (1974) Commissural pathways in interhemispheric transfer of visual information in the pigeon. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences, third study program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MaGoogle Scholar
  10. Curio E (1976) The ethology of predation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Delius JD, Habers G (1978) Symmetry: Can pigeons conceptualize it? Behav Biol 22:336–342Google Scholar
  12. DeValois R, DeValois KK (1980) Spatial vision. Ann Rev Psychol 31:309–341Google Scholar
  13. Eisenman R, Gellens HK (1968) Preference for complexity-simplicity and symmetry-asymmetry. Percept Mot Skills 26:888–890Google Scholar
  14. Gellermann LW (1933) Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychol 42:206–208Google Scholar
  15. Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551Google Scholar
  16. Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concept in the pigeon. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:258–302Google Scholar
  17. Herrnstein RJ, DeVilliers PA (1980) Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. Psychol Learn Motiv 14:59–95Google Scholar
  18. Hollard VD, Delius JD (1982) Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Howe ES (1980) Effects of partial symmetry, exposure time and backward masking on judged goodness and reproduction of visual patterns. Quart J Exp Psychol 32:27–55Google Scholar
  20. Jassik-Gerschenfeld D, Hardy O (1981) Single-cell response to bar-width and to sine-wave grating frequency in the pigeon optic tectum. Vision Res 21:745–747Google Scholar
  21. Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Julesz B, Chang JJ (1979) Symmetry perception and spatial-frequency channels. Perception 8:711–718Google Scholar
  23. Lubow RE (1974) High-order concept formation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 21:475–483Google Scholar
  24. Mello NK (1965) Interhemispheric reversal of mirror-image oblique lines following monocular training in pigeons. Science 148:252–254Google Scholar
  25. Menne M, Curio E (1978) Untersuchungen zum Symmetriekonzept bei Kohlmeisen (Parus major L). Z Tierpsychol 47:299–322Google Scholar
  26. Morgan MJ, Fitch MD, Holman JG, Lea SEG (1976) Pigeons learn the concept of an ‘A’. Perception 5:57–66Google Scholar
  27. Palmer SE, Hemenway K (1978) Orientation and symmetry. Effects of multiple, rotational and near symmetries. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 4:691–702Google Scholar
  28. Pollen DA, Ronner SF (1981) Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. Science 212:1409–1411Google Scholar
  29. Poole J, Lander DG (1971) The pigeon's concept of a pigeon. Psychon Sci 25:157–158Google Scholar
  30. Rensch B (1958) Die Wirksamkeit ästhetischer Faktoren bei Wirbeltieren. Z Tierpsychol 15:447–461Google Scholar
  31. Réperant J (1973) Nouvelles données sur les projections visuelles chez le pigeon (Columba livia). J Hirnforsch 14:151–187Google Scholar
  32. Rosch EH (1973) Natural categories. Cognit Psychol 4:328–350Google Scholar
  33. Seligman MEP (1970) On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychol Rev 77:406–418Google Scholar
  34. Siegel RK, Honig WK (1970) Pigeon concept formation: Successive and simultaneous acquisition. J Exp Anal Behav 13:385–390Google Scholar
  35. Szilagyi PG, Baird JC (1977) A quantitative approach to the study of visual symmetry. Percept Psychophys 22:287–292Google Scholar
  36. Voneida TJ, Mello NK (1975) Interhemispheric projections in pigeon. Brain Behav Evol 11:91–108Google Scholar
  37. Watanabe S (1979) Mirror image discrimination with each eye in pigeons. Physiol Behav 22:331–337Google Scholar
  38. Weyl H (1952) Symmetry. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan D. Delius
    • 1
  • Brigitte Nowak
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimentelle TierpsychologiePsychologisches InstitutBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations