Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 43, Issue 3–4, pp 182–189 | Cite as

Studies of dotted, a regulatory element in maize

I. Inductions of dotted by chromatid breaks II. Phase variation of dotted
  • Earle B. Doerschug
Article
Received:

Summary

Dotted (Dt) is the regulatory element of a two-unit controlling system in maize. Dt causes the inherited change from the recessive a1 (colorless) to its dominant allele, A1 (anthocyanin production), during the development of the stalk, leaves, and endosperm. The mutation events are observed as sectors of color in an anthocyaninless background.

One of the most puzzling, but perhaps significant, aspects of controlling elements in maize is that they originate in conjunction with chromosome or chromatid breaks. This fact invokes a requirement that either an existing regulatory mechanism is disturbed by the breakage or that a foreign element is incorporated before fusion of the broken chromatids.

Experimental crosses were made between Dt tester stocks and a pollen parent, a large proportion of whose chromosomes 9 were undergoing the chromatid type of bridge-breakage-fusion cycle. New Dt's were induced in endosperm sectors of 250 of 154,422 kernels tested (1/600); among these, two germinal Dt's (Dtcrown4 and Dt5) were recovered, presumably due to chromatid breaks during meiosis or the first microspore division. Dt5 produces a mutation pattern very similar to the original Dt1 and is located 0.33 crossover units away from the yg2 locus. This is close to the known location of Dt1 (7 crossover units distal to the yg2 locus) and is suggestive of a specific site for Dt inductive breaks. Dtcrown4, on the other hand, is inherited independently of the yg2 locus and does not support this contention. Dtcrown4 represents a new “state” causing a high concentration of fine dots in the crown of the kernel, with little or no dotting at the base.

The phase variation of Dtcrown4 is discussed together with the tissue-dependent expression of Dtin-ac1 (Dotted, inactive-active). Dtin-ac1 is a new “state” of Dt1 and shows inactive (no a1 to A1 mutations) and active (a1 to A1 mutations) phases in the endosperm, whereas it is only in the active phase in the diploid scutellum. The observed phase variation was shown to be a property of the regulatory elements, Dt, responding to differences in the cellular environment.

Keywords

Maize Regulatory Element Phase Variation Dominant Allele Cellular Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Bianchi, A., Salamini, F., Parlavecchio, R.: On the origin of controlling elements in maize. Genet. Agrar. 22, 335–344 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell, A.: Episomes. New York: Harper and Row 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huebner, R., Todaro, G.: Oncogenes of RNA tumor viruses as determinants of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 64, 1087–1094 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McClintock, B.: The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 36, 344–355 (1950).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McClintock, B.: Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 16, 13–47 (1951a).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McClintock, B.: Mutable loci in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 50, 174–181 (1951b).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McClintock, B.: Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 21, 197–216 (1956).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McClintock, B.: Some paralleles between gene control systems in maize and in bacteria. Am. Nat. 95, 265–277 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McClintock, B.: The control of gene action in maize. Brook-haven Symp. Biol. 18, 162–184 (1965).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neuffer, M. G.: Stability of the suppressor element in two mutator systems at the A1 locus in maize. Genetics 53, 541–549 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nuffer, M. G.: Dosage effect of multiple Dt loci on mutation of a 1 in maize endosperm. Science 121, 399–400 (1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nuffer, M. G.: Mutation studies at the A2 locus in maize: I. A mutable allele controlled by Dt. Genetics 46, 625–640 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peterson, P. A.: Phase variation of regulatory elements in maize. Genetics 54, 249–266 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peterson, P. A.: Controlling elements and mutable loci in maize: Their relationship to bacterial episomes. Genetica 41, 33–56 (1970).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rhoades, M. M.: The effect of varying gene dosage on aleurone color in maize. J. Genet. 33, 347–354 (1936).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rhoades, M. M.: Effect of the Dt gene in the mutability of the a1 allele in maize. Genetics 23, 377–397 (1938).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rhoades, M. M.: The genetic control of mutability in maize. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 9, 138–144 (1941).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rhoades, M. M.: On the genetic control of mutability in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 31, 91–95 (1945).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwartz, D.: Analysis of a highly mutable gene in maize. A molecular model for instability. Genetics 45, 1141–1152 (1960).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Earle B. Doerschug
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsIowa State University of Science and TechnologyAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations