Social Indicators Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 23–40

Predicting the quality of life in the United States

  • Ruth C. Young
  • Dean Maccannell
Article

Abstract

A principal components analysis performed by David M. Smith on 47 U.S. state level indicators of social well-being yielded several components. The first two of these are socio-economic well-being and social pathology. Structural hypotheses are offered to explain state differences in these components. The structural variables condensed by a principal components analysis of state political, economic and social structure measures are differentiation, flexibility-rigidity, and progressive industrialization. These, along with several population measures, determine a substantial part of the variance in the two measures of social well-being.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. MacCannell, Earle Dean: 1968, ‘Structural differentiation and rigidity in forty-eight states of the United States’, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  2. PerloffHarvey S. et al., 1960, Regions, Resources and Economic Growth, (Washington, Resources for the Future).Google Scholar
  3. SchmooklerJacob: 1966, Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
  4. SheldonEleanor Bernert and ParkeRobert: 1975, ‘Social Indicators’ in Science, May 16, pp. 693–699.Google Scholar
  5. SmithDavid M.: 1973, The Geography of Social Well-Being in the United States, (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York), Chapter 7 ‘An inter-state analysis’, and Chapter 8, ‘An inter-city analysis’, pp. 79–120.Google Scholar
  6. Young, Frank W. and Fujimoto, Isao: 1965, ‘Social differentiation in Latin American communities’, Economic Development and Cultural Change XIII No. 3, April.Google Scholar
  7. Young, Ruth C. and Moreno, Jose A.: 1965, ‘Economic development and social rigidity: A comparative study of the forty-eight states’, Economic Development and Cultural Change XIII, No. 4, July.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth C. Young
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dean Maccannell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityCornellUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations