Anatomy and Embryology

, Volume 179, Issue 1, pp 81–88 | Cite as

Quantitative morphology and synaptology of cerebellar glomeruli in the rat

  • R. L. Jakab
  • J. Hámori
Article

Summary

Computer-assisted stereological and quantitative morphological approaches were used to analyse cerebellar glomeruli of the “simple type” in serial ultrathin sections. It was found that, of the total volume (110–200 μm3) of the glomeruli studied, 53% was occupied by granule cell dendrites, 34% by mossy terminal and 13% by Golgi axons. None of the four analysed glomeruli contained Golgi cell dendrites. The mossy terminals that were studied received, on the average, 53 granule cell dendrites. All of the dendrites originated from different granule cells and all made synaptic contacts with mossy terminal. However only about 60% of granule cell dendrites made synapses with Golgi axons. The surface of the mossy terminals occupied by synaptic junctions, was found to be 5.4–5.5%. Each granule cell dendrite emitted 3–5 terminal protrusions (“dendritic digits”). Each digit receives one or more synaptic contact from either the mossy terminal (67% of all digits), or from Golgi axon varicosities (25%). Only about 8% of all digits were contacted synaptically by both types of axonal terminals. All of the dendritic digits that were observed made synaptic connections. Each digit was, on the average, connected by symmetric attachment plaques to 4 neighbouring digits. Three-dimensional reconstructions of mossy terminal and some of contacting granule cell dendrites demonstrated that the dendrites curved around the central mossy terminal and were much longer than expected from earlier Golgi-impregnation studies. In addition to mossy terminals and Golgi axons, an axon terminal of small calibre that contained large, empty, spheroid vesicles were occasionally observed. These terminals, which are most likely the axonal varicosities of ascending parallel fibers, made synaptic contacts exclusively with granule cell dendrites at the periphery of the glomeruli.

The results demonstrate that, in the rat cerebellum, there is a high degree of convergence of granule cells at a glomernius (53 to 1); and that there is a rich inhibitory input to about 60% of all granule cell dendrites. It is also shown that the main postsynaptic targets, for both mossy and Golgi axons, are the dendritic digits. The presence of synaptic contacts between parallel-fiber-like varicosities and granule cell dendrites may be an additional source of excitation within the glomerulus.

Key words

Cerebellar cortex Synaptic glomerulus Mossy terminal Quantitative morphology Three-dimensional reconstruction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan-Palay V (1975) Fine structure of labelled axons in the cerebellar cortex and nuclei of rodents and primates after intraventricular infusions with tritiated serotonin. Anat Embryol 148:235–265Google Scholar
  2. Delesse MA (1847) Procédé méchanique pour déterminer la composition des roches. CR Acad Sci (Paris) 25:544–545Google Scholar
  3. Eccles J, Ito M, Szentágothai J (1967) The cerebellum as a neuronal machine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Fox CA, Hillman DE, Siegesmund KA, Dutta CR (1967) The primate cerebellar cortex: A Golgi and electron microscopic study. In: Fox CA, Snider RS (eds) The cerebellum. Prog Brain Res 25:174–225Google Scholar
  5. Gray EG (1961) The granule cells, mossy synapses and Purkinje spine synapses of the cerebellum: light and electron microscope observations. J Anat (Lond) 95:345–356Google Scholar
  6. Hámori J (1964) Identification in the cerebellar isles of Golgi II axon endings by aid of experimental degeneration. In: Titlbach M (ed) Electron microscopy 1964. Proceedings of the Third European Regional Conference held in Prague, vol B. Chechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 291–292Google Scholar
  7. Hámori J (1981) Synaptic input to the axon hillock and initial segment of inhibitory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex of the rat. Cell Tissue Res 217:553–562Google Scholar
  8. Hámori J, Szentágothai J (1966) Participation of Golgi neuron processes in the cerebellar glomeruli: An electron microscopic study. Exp Brain Res 2:35–48Google Scholar
  9. Hámori J, Somogyi J (1982) Presynaptic dendrites and perikarya in deafferented cerebellar cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5093–5096Google Scholar
  10. Hámori J, Somogyi J (1983a) Differentiation of cerebellar mossy fiber synapses in the rat: A quantitative electron microscope study. J Comp Neurol 220:365–377Google Scholar
  11. Hámori J, Somogyi J (1983b) Formation of new synaptic contacts by Purkinje axon collaterals in the granular layer of deafferented cerebellar cortex of adult rat. Acta Biol Hung 34:163–176Google Scholar
  12. Kimoto Y, Tohyama M, Satoh K, Sakumoto T, Takahashi Y, Shimizu N (1981) Fine structure of rat cerebellar noradrenaline terminals as visualized by potassium permanganate ‘in situ perfusion’ fixation method. Neuroscience 6:47–58Google Scholar
  13. Larramendi LMH (1969a) Morphological characteristics of extrinsic and intrinsic nerve terminals and their synapses in the cerebellar cortex of the mouse. In: Fields WS, Willis WD (eds) The cerebellum in health and disease. WHM Green Inc, St Louis, pp 63–110Google Scholar
  14. Larramendi LMH (1969b) Analysis of synaptogenesis in the cerebellum of the mouse. In: Llinas R (ed) Neurobiology of cerebellar evolution and development. AMA-ERF Institute for Biomedical Research, Chicago, pp 803–843Google Scholar
  15. Llinas R, Hillman DE (1969) Physiological and morphological organization of the cerebellar circuits in various vertebrates. In: Llinas R (ed) Neurobiology of cerebellar evolution and development. AMA-ERF Institute for Biomedical Research, Chicago, pp 43–73Google Scholar
  16. Mugnaini E (1972) The histology and cytology of the cerebellar cortex. In: Larsell O, Jansen J (eds) The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum: The human cerebellum, cerebellar connections and cerebellar cortex. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 201–265Google Scholar
  17. Mugnaini E, Atluri RL, Houk JC (1974) Fine structure of the granular layer in turtle cerebellum with emphasis on large glomeruli. J Neurophysiol 37:1–29Google Scholar
  18. Palay SL (1961) The electron microscopy of glomeruli cerebellosi. In: Cytology of nervous tissue. Proceedings of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 82–84Google Scholar
  19. Palay SL, Chan-Palay V (1974) Cerebellar cortex. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Palkovits M, Magyar P, Szentágothai J (1972) Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. IV. Mossy fiber-Purkinje cell numerical transfer. Brain Res 45:15–29Google Scholar
  21. Zsuppán F (1985) A computer reconstruction system for biological macro- and microstructures traced from serial sections. Acta Morphol Hung 33:33–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Jakab
    • 1
  • J. Hámori
    • 1
  1. 1.1st Department of AnatomySemmelweis University Medical SchoolBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations