Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 288–292 | Cite as

Functional and clinical results after anterior interbody lumbar fusion

  • H. Tiusanen
  • H. Hurri
  • S. Seitsalo
  • K. Österman
  • R. Harju
Original Article

Abstract

The functional and clinical results of anterior interbody lumbar fusion were assessed in 134 patients. Functional tests included spinal mobility and isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurements. The score rating system of the Japanese Orthopaedic association (JOA) and the Oswestry disability index were used for clinical evaluation. Functional results revealed decreased spinal flexibility when compared with normal values. A reduction in physical ability was also seen in the isokinetic trunk muscle measurements. Non-union seemed to have only little effect on the functional results. Patients under 20 years at operation had the best results, but beyond this threshold results did not vary with age. The JOA rating score was 25 or more in 50% of patients. The mean Oswestry disability index was 47.8 (range 1–82) preoperatively and 20 (range 0–68) at follow-up (P<0.001), indicating a clear decrease in subjective disability. Solid fusion was seen in 107 patients (80%) at follow-up.

Key words

Functional tests Isokinetic muscle strength measurements Anterior interbody lumbar fusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R (1994) Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehab Med 26:147–154Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calandruccio RA, Benton BF (1964) Anterior lumbar fusion. Clin Ortho 35: 63–68Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O'Brien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gjessing MH (1951) Osteoblastic anterior fusion of the lower lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Scand 20:200Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmon PH (1950) Results from the treatment of sciatica due to lumbar disc protrusion. Am J Surg 80:829Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harmon PH (1960) Anterior extraperitoneal lumbar disc excision and vertebral body fusion. Clin Orthop 18: 169–184Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harmon PH (1963) Anterior disc excision and fusion of the lumbar vertebral bodies. J Int Coll Surg 40:572–586Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Izumida S, Inoue S (1986) Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:391–394Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lane JD, Moore ES (1948) Transperitoneal approach to the intervertebral disc in the lumbar area. Ann Surg 127: 537Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N (1985) Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine 10:482–493Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raney FL, Adams JE Jr (1963) Anterior lumbar-disc excision and interbody fusion used as a salvage procedure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 45:667–668Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:756–768Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor TKF (1970) Anterior interbody fusion in the management of disorders of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 52:784Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tiusanen
    • 1
  • H. Hurri
    • 1
  • S. Seitsalo
    • 1
  • K. Österman
    • 1
  • R. Harju
    • 1
  1. 1.The Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid FoundationHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations