Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 95–102

Correlates of male reproductive success in the browncheek blenny, Acanthemblemaria crockeri (Blennioidea: Chaenopsidae)

  • Philip A. Hastings


Acanthemblemaria crockeri exhibits a resource defense polygyny mating system with male parental care. Females preferred to mate with the larger of two males in laboratory experiments, and male size was positively correlated with the number of eggs defended by males at two sites in the Gulf of California, Baja California, Mexico. Females appeared to avoid mating with males defending heavily-fouled shelters. The role of other factors including the intensity of male courtship coloration and displays in determining male reproductive success was studied in Bahia San Carlos, Sonora, Mexico by providing glass vials as shelters. This provided a non-destructive technique for counting of eggs defended by males and allowed repeated assessment of the reproductive success of individual males. Males varied greatly in their duration of residency of shelters and in their color score and intensity of courtship displays. The number of eggs received by males was positively correlated with their duration of residency in shelters, and females appeared to avoid mating with new residents. Mated males deserted shelters less frequently and were more likely to receive future matings than were unmated males. The mean color score of males was unrelated to their reproductive success, while the intensity of male courtship displays was negatively correlated with the number of eggs received. This may have resulted because female mate choice is based on multiple criteria, including some that more accurately reflect the quality of parental care afforded by males.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bastock M (1967) Courtship. An ethological study. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown L (1981) Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae, Teleostei). Anim Behav 29:375–382Google Scholar
  4. Burley N (1981) Mate choice by multiple criteria in a monogamous species. Am Nat 117:515–528Google Scholar
  5. Cole KS (1982) Male reproductive behaviour and spawning success in a temperate zone goby, Coryphopterus nicholsi. Can J Zool 60:2309–2316Google Scholar
  6. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dominey WJ, Blumer LS (1984) Cannibalism of early life history stages in fishes. In: Hausfater G, Hrdy SB (eds) Infanticide: Comparative and evolutionary perspectives. Aldine, New York, pp 43–64Google Scholar
  8. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223Google Scholar
  9. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91Google Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Envir Biol Fish 9:173–190Google Scholar
  11. Farr JA (1980) Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Behaviour 74:38–91Google Scholar
  12. Haas R (1976) Sexual selection in Nothobranchius guentheri (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 30:614–622Google Scholar
  13. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge Univ Press, New York, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  14. Hastings PA (1984) Resource limitation in a coral-dwelling fish. Am Zool 24: 128 AGoogle Scholar
  15. Hastings PA (1986) Habitat selection, sex ratio and sexual selection in Coralliozetus angelica (Blennioidea: Chaenopsidae). In: Uyeno T, Arai R, Taniuchi T, Matsuura K (eds) Indo-Pacific fish biology. Ichthyological Soc Japan, Tokyo, pp 785–793Google Scholar
  16. Hastings PA (1987) Mating systems and mate choice in tube blennies (Blennioidea: Chaenopsidae). PhD Diss, Univ Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hastings PA (1988) Female choice and male reproductive success in the angel blenny, Coralliozetus angelica (Teleostei: Chaenopsidae). Anim Behav 36:115–124Google Scholar
  18. Jones GP (1981) Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Bchav Ecol Sociobiol 8:129–142Google Scholar
  19. Kodric-Brown A (1977) Reproductive success and the evolution of breeding territories in pupfish (Cyprinodon). Evolution 31:750–766Google Scholar
  20. Kodric-Brown A (1983) Determinants of male reproductive success in pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Anim Behav 31:128–137Google Scholar
  21. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–205Google Scholar
  22. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323Google Scholar
  23. Lindquist DG (1975) Comparative behavior and ecology of Gulf of California chaenopsid blennies. PhD Diss, Univ Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindquist DG (1980) Aspects of the polychromatism in populations of the Gulf of California browncheek blenny, Acanthemblemaria crockeri (Blennioidea: Chaenopsidae). Copeia 1980:137–141Google Scholar
  25. Marconato A, Bisazza A (1986) Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Anim Behav 34:1580–1581Google Scholar
  26. Noble GK (1938) Sexual selection among fishes. Biol Rev 13:133–158Google Scholar
  27. Noonan KC (1983) Female mate choice in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Anim Behav 31:1005–1010Google Scholar
  28. Perrone M Jr (1978) Mate size and breeding success in a monogamous cichlid fish. Envir Biol Fish 3:193–201Google Scholar
  29. Petersen CW (1985) Mating systems in tropical marine fishes: theory and case studies of simultaneous hermaphroditism and parental care. PhD Diss, Univ Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  30. Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575Google Scholar
  31. Ridley M, Rechten C (1981) Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161Google Scholar
  32. Rohwer S (1978) Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440Google Scholar
  33. Schmale MC (1981) Sexual selection and reproductive success in males of the bicolor damselfish, Eupomacentrus partitus (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Anim Behav 29:1172–1184Google Scholar
  34. Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
  35. Stephens JS Jr (1963) A revised classification of the blennioid fishes of the American family Chaenopsidae. Univ Calif Publ Zool 68:1–165Google Scholar
  36. Thompson S (1986) Male spawning success and female choice in the mottled triplefin, Forsterygion varium (Pisces: Tripterygiidae). Anim Behav 34:580–589Google Scholar
  37. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  39. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Wittenberger JF (1984) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge Univ Press, New York, pp 435–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Hastings
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations